St. Louis Counsel
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Rehabilitation Institute of St. Louis, LLC Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
rehabilitation-institute-of-st-louis-llc
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Corporate LawMedical MalpracticeCivil Litigation

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Free Corporate ConsultationCall About A Corporate Claim

Cases Involving Rehabilitation Institute of St. Louis, LLC

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jan 25, 2022

Nancy Payne, Appellant, vs. Rehabilitation Institute of St. Louis, LLC, Respondent.

Respondent

Nancy Payne sued Rehabilitation Institute of St. Louis, LLC, alleging improper medical care and negligence after she fell from her bed while an inpatient. The trial court granted summary judgment for the Institute, finding Payne's claims were for medical malpractice and thus time-barred by the two-year statute of limitations. The appellate court affirmed, concluding that Payne's claims were indeed related to health care services and therefore fell under the medical malpractice statute of limitations, despite her attempt to label them as ordinary negligence.

Corporate LawMedical MalpracticeCivil Litigation