Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Richard D. Gray Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
richard-d-gray
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Richard D. Gray

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 22, 2019

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard D. Gray, Appellant.

Appellant

Richard D. Gray appealed his convictions for first-degree involuntary manslaughter and second-degree assault following a fatal single-vehicle accident. He challenged the trial court's admission of a warrantless blood draw and his statements to police, the exclusion of expert testimony regarding his general intelligence, and the denial of his motion for a new trial based on newly discovered evidence. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no error in the admission of evidence or the denial of a new trial, applying the precedent set by *Mitchell v. Wisconsin* regarding warrantless blood draws.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 30, 2018

State of Missouri, Respondent, v. Richard D. Gray, Defendant.

Appellant

Richard D. Gray appealed his conviction for involuntary manslaughter and second-degree assault. The appellate court had previously remanded the case for the trial court to hold a hearing on newly discovered evidence. However, the trial court denied Gray's motion for a continuance to secure a witness for this hearing, subsequently denying the motion for a new trial without hearing the evidence. The appellate court reversed the denial of the continuance and remanded the case, finding the trial court abused its discretion and failed to follow its mandate, ordering a hearing on the newly discovered evidence.