Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

R.L.S., II Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
rls-ii
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving R.L.S., II

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / Apr 23, 2025

IN THE INTEREST OF A.D.S.: N.A.W., Respondent vs. R.L.S., II, Appellant

Appellant

N.A.W. (Guardian) petitioned to adopt A.D.S. (Child), alleging Father's consent was not required under section 453.040(7) due to abandonment or neglect. Father appealed the circuit court's judgment granting the adoption, arguing his due process rights were violated because the summons did not notify him of his right to appointed counsel as required by section 211.462. The appellate court affirmed, holding that section 211.462, which pertains to termination of parental rights under chapter 211, is not applicable to an adoption proceeding under section 453.040(7) because chapter 453 does not specifically cross-reference chapter 211 for that ground.