Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Robert Daniel Griffith Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
robert-daniel-griffith
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Robert Daniel Griffith

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jan 29, 2019

Audrey Jane Griffith, Respondent, vs. Robert Daniel Griffith, Appellant.

Appellant

Robert Griffith appealed a trial court order awarding Audrey Griffith $8,000 per month in temporary maintenance during their dissolution of marriage proceedings. Robert argued Audrey did not establish her reasonable needs or inability to earn income, and that he lacked the ability to pay. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's finding that Audrey demonstrated a need for maintenance. However, the court reversed the amount awarded, concluding that the $8,000 per month exceeded Robert's capacity to pay while meeting his own reasonable needs, and remanded the case for reevaluation of the temporary maintenance award.