Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Robert J. Stientjes Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
robert-j-stientjes
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Robert J. Stientjes

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Oct 15, 2024

Evita Tolu, Appellant, vs. Robert J. Stientjes, Respondent.

Respondent

Evita Tolu (Mother) appealed the trial court's judgment modifying child support, raising thirteen points. The appellate court found the trial court erred in determining Mother waived her personal jurisdiction challenge, but affirmed that personal service was proper. The court also affirmed the trial court's discretion regarding child support abatement for college enrollment and its parental income calculations. The judgment was affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded for recalculation of retroactive child support to the date of personal service.