Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Robert Whittaker Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
robert-whittaker
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Robert Whittaker

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Apr 24, 2018

State of Missouri, Respondent, vs. Robert Whittaker, Appellant.

Appellant

Robert Whittaker appealed his convictions for first-degree robbery and armed criminal action, arguing insufficient evidence and a clerical error in his sentencing judgment. The trial court, in a bench trial, found Whittaker guilty and sentenced him to concurrent fifteen-year terms, also finding him a prior and persistent offender. The appellate court affirmed the convictions, finding sufficient evidence that Whittaker used a knife to overcome resistance during the course of stealing a lawn mower. However, the court modified the judgment by deleting the finding that Whittaker was a prior and persistent offender, as the trial court never made such a finding on the record.