Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

RYAN N. EVANS, Movant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
ryan-n-evans-movant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving RYAN N. EVANS, Movant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Southern District / May 24, 2019

RYAN N. EVANS, Movant-Appellant v. STATE OF MISSOURI, Respondent-Respondent

Appellant

Ryan Evans appealed the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion to set aside convictions for child abuse and felony murder, claiming ineffective assistance of trial counsel. Evans argued his counsel was ineffective for failing to object to an autopsy doctor's testimony, alleging the doctor was statutorily unqualified. The motion court denied relief, finding counsel's decision was reasonable trial strategy and the objection would have been non-meritorious. The appellate court affirmed, concluding the motion court's decision was not clearly erroneous.