Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

SCARLETT NORRIS ADAMS, AS TRUSTEE OF THE SCARLETT NORRIS ADAMS REVOCABLE TRUST, DATED APRIL 9, 2013 Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
scarlett-norris-adams-as-trustee-of-the-scarlett-norris-adams-revocable-trust-dated-april-9-2013
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving SCARLETT NORRIS ADAMS, AS TRUSTEE OF THE SCARLETT NORRIS ADAMS REVOCABLE TRUST, DATED APRIL 9, 2013

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Scarlett Norris Adams, as Trustee, appealed the trial court's failure to award attorney fees in a partition action, while Eliza Lamm cross-appealed the dismissal of her counterclaims. The appellate court found that the trial court erred by considering matters outside the pleadings and making a finding of fact when ruling on a motion to dismiss, and by incorrectly determining it lacked subject matter jurisdiction over Lamm's quiet title counterclaim. Consequently, the appellate court vacated the dismissal of Lamm's counterclaims and all subsequent orders, remanding the case for further proceedings.