Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Scott Greene Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
scott-greene
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Scott Greene

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Sep 17, 2019

Scott Greene, Appellant, v. Marietta Greene, Respondent.

Appellant

Scott Greene appealed the trial court's judgment ordering the sale of the marital residence and dividing the proceeds with Marietta Greene, his ex-wife, following a petition in equity. The trial court also made findings regarding the residence's fair rental value and awarded Scott Greene repair costs. The appellate court reversed and remanded the judgment, holding that the trial court's determination of the fair rental value was not supported by any evidence in the record.