Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Sean Dougherty Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
sean-dougherty
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Sean Dougherty

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Jun 10, 2025

Sean Dougherty, Appellant, vs. Coppergate Commons Condominium Association, Respondent.

Appellant

Sean Dougherty appealed the trial court's judgment striking his pleadings and entering a default judgment in favor of Coppergate Commons Condominium Association as a sanction for his repeated failure to comply with discovery orders. Dougherty also challenged the award of attorneys' fees and the denial of his motion to set aside the judgment. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no abuse of discretion in the imposition of sanctions or the award of attorneys' fees. The court also granted Coppergate's motion for appellate attorneys' fees and remanded for a determination of the amount.