Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Shannon Robinson, et al Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
shannon-robinson-et-al
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Shannon Robinson, et al

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

St. Louis and Jackson counties, along with two county health centers, appealed the circuit court's denial of their post-judgment motions to intervene as a matter of right in a declaratory judgment action against the Missouri Department of Health and Senior Services (DHSS). The Supreme Court of Missouri affirmed the denial for the health centers due to their failure to file proposed pleadings, but reversed for the counties. The Court held that the counties met all requirements for intervention as a matter of right, including timely application after DHSS decided not to appeal the judgment invalidating certain health regulations. The case was remanded with instructions to sustain the counties' motion to intervene and amend the judgment.

Several Missouri counties and health centers (Intervenors) appealed the denial of their post-judgment motions to intervene in a declaratory judgment action concerning COVID-19 regulations. The underlying action resulted in a summary judgment invalidating certain health regulations, which the Attorney General declined to appeal. The Intervenors sought to intervene to appeal that judgment. The appellate court affirmed the denial of intervention, holding that substantial justice did not require post-judgment intervention given the Intervenors' prior awareness of the litigation and the Attorney General's stance.