Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

St. Louis Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority, et al. Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
st-louis-regional-convention-and-sports-complex-authority-et-al
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving St. Louis Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority, et al.

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

The St. Louis Regional Convention and Sports Complex Authority, the City of St. Louis, and St. Louis County sued the Rams, the NFL, and its owners, including E. Stanley Kroenke, after the Rams relocated from St. Louis to Los Angeles in 2016. Plaintiffs alleged various claims, including breach of contract, based on their status as third-party beneficiaries of the NFL's relocation policy. The Rams and Kroenke moved to compel arbitration, arguing that 1995 agreements contained mandatory arbitration provisions. The trial court denied the motion to compel. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the 1995 contracts did not clearly and unmistakably delegate arbitrability to an arbitrator, as the relevant AAA rule did not exist at the time of contract formation, and that Plaintiffs' claims were independent of the 1995 agreements.