State Farm Fire and Casualty Company Missouri Cases
This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.
Party ID
state-farm-fire-and-casualty-company
Cases Shown
7
Top Practice Route
Insurance Bad Faith
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Practice Pages
Practical guidance connected to this party profile
These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.
Philip and Lori Brewer filed an insurance claim with State Farm for property damage to their home. When the parties disagreed on the scope of covered repairs, the Brewers sought to invoke the policy's appraisal provision and moved the circuit court to appoint an umpire. The appellate court reversed the circuit court's order, holding that the dispute concerned the scope of coverage, not merely the amount of loss, and therefore the appraisal provision was inapplicable. The court vacated the judgment and dismissed the petition for umpire appointment without prejudice.
Jonathan Loomis appealed the trial court's grant of summary judgment to State Farm Fire and Casualty Company regarding underinsured motor vehicle coverage. Loomis was injured in an accident while covered by a temporary insurance binder, but State Farm denied his claim, asserting his coverage limits matched the at-fault driver's. The appellate court reversed the summary judgment and remanded the case, holding that the insurance binder was ambiguous because it referenced a non-existent "Declarations Page" for coverage limits, thus creating a genuine issue of material fact.