Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

State of Missouri Department of Social Services, Family Support Division Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
state-of-missouri-department-of-social-services-family-support-division
Cases Shown
9
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving State of Missouri Department of Social Services, Family Support Division

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Keith Henderson appealed the circuit court's judgment modifying his child support obligation, which had approved an administrative order increasing his payments. Henderson argued the administrative order failed to comply with statutory requirements regarding the continuation of support for an adult child attending college. The appellate court reversed the judgment, finding that the administrative hearing officer failed to make specific findings of fact and conclusions of law regarding the oldest child's emancipation, which was an issue clearly raised by Father. The case was remanded to the circuit court with directions to further remand to the Family Support Division for proper findings or additional evidence.

Respondent

Michael Shipley appealed the dismissal of his petition to enforce two Eighth Circuit Court of Appeals procedural orders as foreign judgments in Jackson County Circuit Court. Shipley had previously attempted to enforce these orders, which stemmed from a federal § 1983 action against the Family Support Division regarding child support collection. The appellate court affirmed the circuit court's dismissal, holding that the Eighth Circuit's procedural orders were not enforceable judgments. The court also found the appeal frivolous and remanded for the circuit court to determine the costs and fees to be paid by Shipley to the Family Support Division.