Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

State of Missouri ex rel. Rashad P. Washington Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
state-of-missouri-ex-rel-rashad-p-washington
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving State of Missouri ex rel. Rashad P. Washington

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Appellant

Relator Rashad Washington sought a writ of mandamus to compel the circuit court to release him on probation after he successfully completed a 120-day shock incarceration program. The circuit court denied probation, stating its decision was based on the nature of Washington's underlying charges and pre-sentencing evidence. The Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, issued a permanent writ of mandamus, holding that the circuit court erred as a matter of law by denying probation solely on such evidence. The court directed the circuit court to rescind its order and release Washington on probation.