Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Tequea Fisher Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
tequea-fisher
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Corporate Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Tequea Fisher

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 20, 2020

Tequea Fisher vs. H & H Motor Group, LLC

Appellant

Tequea Fisher sued H&H Motor Group, LLC, under the Missouri Merchandising Practices Act (MMPA) after purchasing a vehicle with a defective title. The trial court found in Fisher's favor, awarding actual and punitive damages, and attorney's fees. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's finding of an MMPA violation and the awards of punitive damages and attorney's fees, but reduced the actual damages award. The court also remanded the case for a determination of appellate attorney's fees.