Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

TERRY BRACKNEY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RENATE MACK Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
terry-brackney-as-personal-representative-of-the-estate-of-renate-mack
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Real Estate
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving TERRY BRACKNEY, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF RENATE MACK

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Terry Brackney, a domiciliary foreign personal representative for Renate Mack's Estate, appealed the denial of his counterclaims for quiet title and constructive trust regarding real estate in Ozark County. The trial court had applied a one-year statute of limitations for admitting a will to probate, finding the claims time-barred. The appellate court reversed the denial of the quiet title claim, holding that the one-year statute of limitations does not apply to quiet title or constructive trust actions brought by a DFPR who has properly filed their appointment. However, the court affirmed the denial of the constructive trust claim on its merits and dismissed the claim for attorney's fees due to lack of preservation.