Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

The Honorable Brian H. May Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
the-honorable-brian-h-may
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Civil Litigation
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving The Honorable Brian H. May

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Country Mutual Insurance Co. (Relator) petitioned for a writ of prohibition against Judge Brian H. May (Respondent) after its timely application for a change of judge was denied. Relator, an intervenor in a wrongful death suit, argued that upon filing its application, Respondent lost authority to take any further action in the case. The Missouri Supreme Court agreed, making the preliminary writ of prohibition permanent, directing Respondent to vacate his orders and sustain the application for a change of judge.

Mario Richardson sought a writ of prohibition to prevent Judge Brian May from presiding over his criminal case, arguing his application for a change of judge was timely filed after a superseding indictment added new charges. The Supreme Court of Missouri quashed the preliminary writ of prohibition. The Court held that Richardson's application was untimely because the "initial plea" refers to the first plea in the criminal case, not subsequent pleas to new charges, and the "designation of the trial judge" occurred when the judge was first assigned, not when new charges were filed.