Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Timothy Hill Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
timothy-hill
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Timothy Hill

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / May 29, 2018

Timothy Hill, Appellant, vs. SSM Health Care St. Louis, Respondent.

Appellant

Timothy Hill appealed from a jury verdict in favor of SSM Health Care St. Louis in his wrongful death claim, which stemmed from his father's fall at an SSM facility. Hill alleged that SSM improperly destroyed surveillance video of the incident. The appellate court reversed the trial court's judgment and remanded for a new trial, finding that the trial court erred by denying Hill's motion for an adverse inference under the spoliation doctrine and by overruling his objection to SSM's misstatement of law during closing arguments regarding spoliation.