Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Timothy Wolf Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
timothy-wolf
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Timothy Wolf

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Nov 9, 2021

Timothy Wolf, Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent.

Appellant

Timothy Wolf appealed the circuit court's judgment overruling his motion for post-conviction relief under Rule 24.035. Wolf argued the court erred by not appointing counsel before ruling on his motion. The appellate court affirmed the judgment, holding that the circuit court did not err because Wolf failed to file an affidavit asserting his indigency with his pro se motion, which is a prerequisite for the appointment of counsel under Rule 24.035(e).

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Apr 7, 2020

State of Missouri vs. Timothy Wolf

Respondent

Timothy Wolf appealed the denial of his Rule 29.07(d) motion to withdraw his guilty plea for criminal nonsupport, arguing he was misled into pleading guilty and that a missing transcript prevented meaningful appellate review. The appellate court dismissed the appeal. It held that Wolf's claim regarding his guilty plea was not preserved for review as it was not raised in his motion below, and even if considered, it was procedurally defaulted as it fell under Rule 24.035 and was time-barred.