Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Travon Marcel Williams Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
travon-marcel-williams
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Criminal Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Travon Marcel Williams

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Oct 6, 2020

State of Missouri vs. Travon Marcel Williams

Respondent

Travon Marcel Williams appealed his convictions for first-degree involuntary manslaughter and armed criminal action, arguing there was insufficient evidence to prove he did not act in lawful defense of another. Williams shot Jacobsen Laumoli during a Halloween party altercation, claiming he was defending another person involved in a fistfight. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, concluding that a reasonable juror could have found the State proved beyond a reasonable doubt that Williams did not act in defense of another, given the nature of the initial fight and Williams's actions after the shooting.