Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Treasurer of the State of Missouri-Custodian of The Second Injury Fund Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
treasurer-of-the-state-of-missouricustodian-of-the-second-injury-fund
Cases Shown
28
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Cases Involving Treasurer of the State of Missouri-Custodian of The Second Injury Fund

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases
Respondent

Robert Schebaum appealed the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission's denial of permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund. Schebaum, who had preexisting hearing loss and two work-related knee injuries, argued that his hearing loss should qualify as a preexisting disability or at least be considered in determining his employability. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's decision, holding that Schebaum's hearing loss did not qualify as a preexisting disability under the statute because it did not directly and significantly aggravate or accelerate his subsequent work-related injury. The court further clarified that non-qualifying disabilities cannot be considered when determining permanent total disability for Fund liability.

Appellant

Jimmy Mickelberry sought permanent and total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund after a workplace injury combined with preexisting conditions. The Administrative Law Judge found the Fund liable, and the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission adopted this award. On appeal, the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, reversed the Commission's award, holding that the Commission exceeded its statutory authority by reviewing the Fund's facially defective application for review. The Court reinstated the ALJ's original award as the final judgment.

Respondent

Thomas Dubuc sought permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund following a workplace injury, combined with preexisting disabilities. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission found the Fund liable, applying section 287.220.2. The Second Injury Fund appealed, arguing the Commission erroneously applied the law. The appellate court reversed and remanded, holding that section 287.220.3, not 287.220.2, applied because Dubuc's work injury occurred after January 1, 2014, and clarified that Cosby is controlling precedent for all permanent disability claims.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District / Dec 26, 2018

Dennis Moss vs. Treasurer of the State of Missouri-Custodian of The Second Injury Fund

Respondent

Dennis Moss, a corrections officer, sought permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund after a work injury exacerbated pre-existing conditions. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarded benefits, which the Fund appealed, arguing that Moss's physician did not explicitly certify permanent total disability as required by statute. The appellate court affirmed the Commission's award, holding that the statute only requires a physician to demonstrate and certify the employee's medical condition and work restrictions, allowing the Commission to consider vocational evidence for employability.