Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

WEBSTER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a Missouri Corporation, Defendant- Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
webster-electric-cooperative-inc-a-missouri-corporation-defendant
Cases Shown
1
Top Practice Route
Personal Injury
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving WEBSTER ELECTRIC COOPERATIVE, INC., a Missouri Corporation, Defendant-

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

David and Leisa Jungers sued Webster Electric Cooperative for damages after negligent transformer installation caused water damage to their home. Webster paid for the repairs, but the Jungers sought additional damages for the lost sale of their home and diminution of its value. The trial court granted summary judgment for Webster, ruling that damages were limited to the cost of repair. The appellate court affirmed, holding that the cost of repair was the proper measure of damages given the successful repairs, and that the claimed lost sale damages were merely an alternative form of diminution of value, which was not recoverable.