Ott Law Firm

Missouri Case Party

Yelena Vakula Missouri Cases

This party appears in the Ott Law Firm Missouri court opinion archive. The cases below connect legal research paths to related practice pages when the opinions map to practical client issues.

Party ID
yelena-vakula
Cases Shown
2
Top Practice Route
Family Law
Archive note: This is a summary of public court records and is not legal advice. Missouri slip opinions may be modified or withdrawn; consult the official source. This archive contains Missouri appellate slip opinions reproduced for research convenience, not the final official reporter version. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Practice Pages

Practical guidance connected to this party profile

These links route party-name research from the court archive into Ott Law Firm practice pages when the associated opinions map to a practical client issue.

Legal Help From The Archive

Need help turning court research into a case plan?

If a party-profile research path points to a current injury, employment, insurance, or litigation issue, Ott Law Firm can review the facts and explain practical next steps.

Cases Involving Yelena Vakula

Showing up to 50 recent opinion records for this party.

Browse party cases

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Apr 13, 2021

Dmitriy Dubrovenskiy, Petitioner/Appellant, v. Yelena Vakula, Respondent/Respondent.

Respondent

Dmitriy Dubrovenskiy (Husband) appealed from the trial court's amended judgment of dissolution of marriage, challenging the award of nominal modifiable maintenance, division of two savings accounts, assignment of the child tax exemption, order to pay a portion of Wife's attorney's fees, and unequal division of marital property. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no abuse of discretion in any of the challenged rulings. The court concluded that the trial court's decisions were supported by substantial evidence and did not erroneously declare or apply the law.

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District / Mar 12, 2019

Dimitry Dubrovenskiy, Petitioner/Appellant, vs. Yelena Vakula, Respondent/Respondent.

Respondent

Dimitriy Dubrovenskiy (Husband) appealed from the trial court's Amended Judgment Pendente Lite (JPL), which ordered him to pay temporary maintenance to Yelena Vakula (Wife) and established a temporary custody arrangement for their minor child. Husband contended the trial court erred by including speculative living expenses in Wife's needs for maintenance and by making unsupported findings of domestic violence affecting the custody plan. The appellate court affirmed the trial court's judgment, finding no abuse of discretion in the maintenance award and deferring to the trial court's credibility determinations and weighing of factors for temporary custody.