Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Angeline Thomas v. Rose Metal Products

Decision date: August 19, 200510 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying workers' compensation to Angeline Thomas for an alleged injury on September 10, 2003. The Commission found that the administrative law judge correctly evaluated the lay and medical testimony presented in the case.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 03-089867

Employee: Angeline Thomas

Employer: Rose Metal Products

Insurer: Federated Mutual Insurance Company

Date of Accident: Alleged September 10, 2003

Place and County of Accident: Alleged Greene County, Missouri

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated March 31, 2005, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

The Commission finds that the administrative law judge correctly weighed and evaluated the lay and medical testimony in reaching his conclusions as to the issues presented. Reese v. Gary \& Roger Link, Inc., 5 S.W.3d 522 (Mo. App. E.D. 2002), Sullivan v. Masters Jackson Paving Co., 35 S.W.3d 879 (Mo. App. S.D.2001), Landman v. Ice Cream Specialties, Inc., 107 S.W.3d 240 (Mo. banc 2003).

The award and decision of Associate Administrative Law Judge L. Timothy Wilson, as issued, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 19^{\text {th }}$ day of August 2005.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Secretary

AWARD

Employee: Angeline Thomas

Injury No. 03-089867

Dependents: $\quad \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A}$

Befor the

Employer: Rose Metal Products

DIVISION OF WORKERS'

Additional Party:N/A

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Angeline Thomas

Injury No: 03-089867

Before the

DIVISION OF WORKERS'

COMPENSATION

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Dependents: $\quad \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A}$

Employer: Rose Metal Products

Additional Party N/A

Insurer: Federated Mutual Insurance Company

Checked by: LTW/mp

The above-referenced workers' compensation claim was heard before the undersigned Associate Administrative Law Judge on November 4, 2004. The record was left open for the submission of additional evidence and briefs, resulting in the record being completed and submitted to the undersigned on or about December 31, 2004.

The parties entered into a stipulation of facts. The stipulation is as follows:

(1) On or about September 10, 2003, Rose Metal Products was an employer operating under and subject to The Missouri Workers' Compensation Law and during this time was fully insured by Federated Mutual Insurance Co.

(2)On the alleged injury date of September 10, 2003, Angeline Thomas was an employee of the employer and was working under and subject to The Missouri Workers'Compensation Law. The above-referenced employment and alleged accident occurred in Greene County, Missouri. Venue is proper. The Claim for Compensation was filed within the time prescribed by Section 287.430, RSMo. At the time of the alleged accident or incident of occupational disease, the employee's average weekly wage was 378.00, which is sufficient to allow a compensation rate of 252.00 for temporary and permanent disability compensation. Temporary disability compensation and medical care have not been provided to the employee.
The sole issues to be resolved by hearing include:
(1)Whether the employee sustained an accident or incident of occupational disease on or about September 10, 2003?
(2)Whether the employee provided the employer with notice of the accident as required by Section 287.420, RSMo?
(3)Whether the employee sustained an accident or incident of occupational disease on or about September 10, 2003; and, if so, whether the alleged accident or incident of occupational disease arose out of and in the course of her employment with the Rose Metal Products?
(4)Whether the alleged accident or incident of occupational disease caused the injuries and disabilities for which benefits are now being claimed?
(5)Whether the employee has sustained injuries that will require additional medical care in order to cure and relieve her of the effects of the injuries?
(6)Whether the employer and insurer are obligated to pay for certain past medical care and expenses? (This issue is deferred pending further hearing.)
(7)Whether any temporary total disability compensation is owed to the employee? (The employee seeks 46 weeks of temporary total disability compensation, payable for the period of September 18, 2003, through August 5, 2004?)
(8)Whether the claimant sustained any permanent disability as a consequence of the alleged accident or incident of occupational disease; and, if so, the nature and extent of the disability?
(9)Whether the employee is entitled to costs under Section 287.560, RSMo?
EVIDENCE PRESENTED
The claimant testified at the hearing in support of her claim. In addition, the claimant offered for admission the following exhibits:
Exhibit ADeposition of James A. Stuckmeyer, M.D.
Exhibit BPhotograph of Chair
Exhibit CPhotograph of Computer / Desk
Exhibit DStatement for Services Rendered
Exhibit ECommunication from Springfield Family Physicians Re: Employee’s
Off Work Status
Exhibit FEmployee Data Calendar (2000)
Exhibit GLetter of Denial from Insurer to Employee
Exhibit HPersonnel File (Notes) Re: Employee
The exhibits were received and admitted into evidence.

The employer and insurer presented two witnesses at the hearing of this case - Richard Splitter and Bertha (Bert) Hunt. Also, the employer and insurer offered for admission the following exhibits:

Exhibit 1 ..... Medical Records from Springfield Family Physicians

Exhibit 2 ............... Medical Records from Ferrell Duncan Clinic

Exhibit 3 ................. Medical Records from Cox Medical Center

Exhibit 4 ................ Photographs of Office Desk and Work Station

Exhibit 5 ................. Records from Dubinick Chiropractic Group

Exhibit 6 ............................ Deposition of Steven Otto, M.D.

Exhibits 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 were received and admitted into evidence at the time of the hearing of November 4, 2004. Exhibit 6 was received and admitted into evidence subsequent to the hearing on or about December 7, 2004.

In addition, the parties identified several documents filed with the Division of Workers' Compensation which were made part of a single exhibit identified as the Legal File. The undersigned took official notice of the documents contained in the Legal File which include: Claim for Compensation; Answer of Employer \& Insurer to Claim for Compensation; and Report of Injury. Also, the undersigned has filed with the Legal File Mr. Stang's Letter Dated December 8, 2004, and Ms. Turner's Letter Dated December 1, 2004.

DISCUSSION

The employee, Angeline Thomas, is 40 years of age, having been born on February 19, 1965. Ms.Thomas is a resident of Nixa, Missouri.

In or around September 1999, Ms. Thomas secured employment with Rose Metal Products, working as a data entry clerk. In this employment Ms. Thomas worked eight-hour days, and during the workday performed repetitive hand movements. The duties of Ms. Thomas included the following activity:

- Figuring time cards manually and posting the time to work orders for each employee;

- Entering house sales and work orders into the computer, which involved retrieval of files from filing cabinets, data entry of information, and refilling of files in the filing cabinets; and

- Filing and assisting in computer inventory control, which involved keeping track of materials and time spent on jobs.

According to Ms. Thomas, with each work order she entered ten to twelve items on the computer which required her repeatedly to look up and down, as she could not see the computer monitor screen and the work order at the same time. Additionally, Ms. Thomas noted that she did "keying in" most of the day, every day, and spent six hours a day on the computer. Also, Ms. Thomas would occasionally relieve the receptionist for lunch.

In addition, Ms. Thomas testified that, in the course of performing her work duties, she had to lower her chair to do data entry, but she was not required to hold her head and neck in a fixed position. Notably, she could generally control the pace of her work and the tasks she performed. Further, prior to beginning employment with Rose Metal Products and continuing through 2000, Ms. Thomas worked as a full-time student, studying computer programming at a local business college.

In February 2000 Ms. Thomas began to experience discomfort and pain in her neck, upper back, and upper extremities. In light of these symptoms, on February 4, 2000, Ms. Thomas presented to Robert L. Dubinick, D.C., for chiropractic treatment. At the time of this visit, Dr. Dubinick took a history of Ms. Thomas' complaints and noted the following,

The patient is a 34-year-old, white female. She works as a bookkeeper at Rose Metal Products. She is also a full-time student, studying computer programming. She is under quite a bit of stress. She denies any radiation of the complaints into the upper extremities. She gets occasional tingling sensations in her neck and upper back. These are related to increased exertional activity and demand place the musculature. Sitting seems to make it worse. Overall it seems to be getting worse. No palliative factors are identified.

Dr. Dubinick provided Ms. Thomas with chiropractic treatment consisting of hot packs and interferential current, and a series of manipulations. This treatment appears to have provided Ms. Thomas with some relief as her symptoms decreased and she received no further treatment for her symptoms until 2003.

stiffness / pain that had persisted for one day. Additionally, Ms. Thomas presented with complaints of headaches, which Dr. Fry diagnosed as migraines. In light of his examination and evaluation, Dr. Fry prescribed adjustments, medication, and physical therapy, which Ms. Thomas did not consider to be helpful. Following this receipt of treatment, and in light of Ms. Thomas continuing to experience complaints of pain, Dr. Fry prescribed an MRI of the cervical spine which proved to be negative. Following his review and evaluation of the MRI diagnostic study, Dr. Fry diagnosed Ms. Thomas with cervical disc disease. Although experiencing symptoms, Ms. Thomas continued to work and engage in her employment with Rose Metal Products.

In September 2003 Ms. Thomas sought and obtained medical leave, complaining that she was experiencing migraines and shoulder / neck pain, and believing that she could not do her job. On or about September 18, 2003, Dr. Fry took Ms. Thomas off work; and Ms. Thomas began receiving short-term disability benefits through Rose Metal Products. On September 30, 2003, Ms. Thomas filed a Claim for Compensation, alleging that, as a consequence of her employment with Rose Metal Products, she sustained a work-related injury involving her neck and upper extremities. Through this Claim for Compensation, Ms. Thomas requested that the employer and its insurer provide her with medical treatment and temp

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.