Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Ann Dudley v. Commerce Bancshares

Decision date: October 6, 20057 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's denial of workers' compensation benefits for Ann Dudley, finding that her alleged injury from work stress on January 2, 2004 did not constitute a compensable accident or occupational disease under Missouri law. No compensation was awarded as the injury was determined not to have arisen out of and in the course of employment.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 04-017015

Employee: Ann Dudley

Employer: Commerce Bancshares

Insurer: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund (Open)

Date of Accident: Alleged January 2, 2004

Place and County of Accident: Alleged Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated April 19, 2005, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Paula A. McKeon, issued April 19, 2005, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 6^{\text {th }} \qquad$ day of October 2005.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Secretary

AWARD

Employee:Ann DudleyInjury No. 04-017015
Dependants:N/A
Employer:Commerce Bancshares
Insurer:Liberty Mutual Insurance Company
Hearing Date:February 17, 2005Checked by: PAM/bi

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No.
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? No.
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? No.
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: January 2, 2004.
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? No.
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Unusual and extraordinary work stress.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No. Date of death? N/A
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: N/A
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: None.
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: None.
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? None.
  17. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? $\ 9,774.05.
  18. Employee's average weekly wages: By agreement.
  19. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 662.55 / 347.05$
  20. Method wages computation: By agreement.

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable: None.
  2. Second Injury Fund liability: None.
  3. Future requirements awarded: None.

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Ann Dudley

Injury No. 04-017015

Dependants: N/A

Employer: Commerce Bancshares

Insurer: Liberty Mutual Insurance Company

Additional Party: Second Injury Fund

On February $17^{\text {th }}, 2005$, the Employee and Employer appeared for hearing. The Division has jurisdiction to hear this claim pursuant to $\S 287.110$. The Employee, Ann Dudley appeared in person and with counsel, John McKay. The Employer and Insurer appeared through counsel, John Graham. The Second Injury Fund did not appear for the hearing.

STIPULATIONS

The parties stipulated:

1) that on or about January 2, 2004, Commerce Bancshares was an employer operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law with its liability fully insured by Liberty Mutual Insurance Company;

2) that on January 2, 2004, Ann Dudley was an employee of Commerce Bancshares working subject to the laws in Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri;

3) that Ms. Dudley provided notice and a timely claim for compensation was filed;

4) that Ms. Dudley's compensation rate is $\$ 662.55 / 347.05$ per week;

5) that no medical expenses or past temporary total benefits have been provided by the Employer; and

6) that Ann Dudley has incurred medical expenses in the amount of $\ 9,774.05.

ISSUES

The parties requested the Division to determine:

1) whether Ann Dudley sustained an accident and/or occupational disease arising out of and in the course of her employment with Commerce Bancshares.

FINDINGS AND RULINGS

Ann Dudley has alleged she sustained an accident or occupational disease as a result of undue stress in the scope of her employment with Commerce Bancshares. Recovery for a mental injury from work-related stress is dependent upon showing the stress was "extraordinary and unusual" §287.120.8 RSMo. 2000. Additionally, such work stress must be measured by "objective standards and actual events". To establish a claim under §287.120.8, Dudley must present credible evidence of similarly situated employees with the focus on evidence of the stress encountered by those employees. Absent such evidence Dudley fails in meeting her burden of proving the objective nature of stress. See Carnal v. Pride Cleaners, 138 S.W.3d 155 (Mo.App. 2004); Williams v. DePaul Health Center, 996 S.W.2d (Mo.App. 1999). The seminal issue in this case is whether the stressors alleged by Dudley are extraordinary and unusual as contemplated by chapter 287 and whether sufficient evidence was presented to show that the work stress was extraordinary and unusual as measured by objective standards.

§287.120.8 states: "(8) Mental injury resulting from work-related stress does not arise out of and in the course of employment, unless it is demonstrated that the stress is work-related and was extraordinary and unusual. The amount of work stress shall be measured by objective standards and actual events. (9) A mental injury is not considered to arise out of and in the course of employment if it resulted from any disciplinary action, work evaluation, job transfer, layoff, demotion, termination, or any similar action taken in good faith by the employer."

The focus of Dudley's evidence and theory is that her work-related stress resulted in depression and anxiety.

Dudley essentially contends two separate theories of what caused her stress at work. The first involves Dudley's relationship with co-employee and former supervisor, Mark Tanksley. The second involves a job transfer to Commerce Bank downtown facility in June 2003.

Ann Dudley was branch manager at the Commerce Bank downtown branch from June 30, 2003 to approximately December 2003. Dudley was previously bank manager at Commerce Bank Barry Road branch. One of Dudley's job duties was to sell annuities. Dudley was Commerce Bank's top performer for annuities sales. In 2002 Dudley earned approximately $\ 35,000 in annuity commission in addition to her base salary. Her supervisor at the Barry Road location was Mark Tanksley.

Dudley testified that Tanksley made disparaging remarks about women and various members of Commerce Bank board of directors. Dudley believed that Tanksley misrepresented promotion opportunities.

Dudley filed a grievance with Commerce Bank about Tanksley's remarks and demeanor. Tanksley was required by Commerce to undergo counseling following the complaint by Dudley.

Dudley testified that Tanksley still promoted a hostile work environment following the counseling. Dudley said Tanksley refused to speak with her directly, made faces at her, and once squealed his tires in front of her in the bank parking lot.

Dudley filed a second grievance regarding Tanksley. In December 2001 Tanksley was transferred to a different bank branch although remained as Dudley's immediate supervisor.

Dudley sought medical treatment for depression as a result of the stress created at work by Mark Tanksley.

Dudley applied and accepted transfer to Commerce Bank downtown branch in June 2003 in part to get away from Mark Tanksley. Dudley had two occasions of stress related to Tanksley after her transfer downtown. First, Tanksley requested that Dudley service the annuity customers that she had sold and received commissions on at the Barry Road branch. Dudley agreed to that request. Second, Dudley and Tanksley both claimed credit for creating a new business account and loan. Dudley worked hard to obtain the business customer. Commerce ultimately attributed the credit for the business to Dudley rather than Tanksley to resolve the dispute.

The second stress for Dudley followed her transfer to the Commerce Bank downtown branch in June 2003. Dudley provides a comprehensive list of her job duties as branch manager. Virtually all of the duties cited by Dudley produced work stress for her. Dudley's complaints fall into three basic categories: Duties primarily the same as before her transfer with increased volume; new duties from her previous position as Barry Road manager; and new duties from previous downtown manager Sherry Jones.

Dudley's duties that were similar to her previous job with Commerce Barry Road branch but with increased volume downtown include:

1) Maintaining master keys for vaults and safe deposit boxes.

2) Preparing overdraft lists.

3) Reviewing internal and external e-mails.

4) Responding to internal and external phone calls.

5) Meeting with sales staff and coaching.

6) Preparing expense reports.

7) Monthly sales reports.

8) Branch manager meetings.

9) Annuity calls.

10) Teller operation meetings.

11) Sales compliance meetings.

12) Small business meetings.

13) Benefits banking.

14) Personnel issues concerning employees hiring, firing, scheduling.

15) Customer complaints both in person, by e-mail, and telephone calls.

In each and everyone of the above cited job duties, Dudley testified that the volume increased significantly from her job duties at the Barry Road location to the point where Dudley felt overwhelmed and unable to complete her tasks.

One of Dudley's primary complaints on her transfer to the downtown branch was that her desk was in the middle of the open lobby. She found it almost impossible to complete any tasks without interruption. Dudley previously had a private office at the Barry Road branch. However, Sherry Jones, the previous manager at the downtown location also sat in the open-air lobby. The current bank manager also is in the open lobby.

Many of the Commerce Bank executives were located at the downtown branch. Dudley was required to notify her supervisor in the event an executive or board member made an inquiry or complaint. Dudley found this task to be stressful and extraordinary. Sherry Jones also was required to notify her supervisors in the event bank executives or a member of its board of directors had made a complaint or inquiry.

Dudley also had to participate in a new technology rollout at the downtown branch. Commerce tried its new photo ID technology at the downtown and select suburban branches during Dudley's tenure. Commerce would periodically propose new technologies to provide services to its customers. The downtown branch was not the only branch participating in the technology rollout.

Dudley also significantly complained about the benefits banking program. The benefits banking program attempts to encourage individual employees of a large Commerce business clients to open accounts with Commerce Bank. Bank representatives are sent to the employer on a regular basis to drum up new business. Bank representatives provide individual business cards to potential customers with their phone numbers and e-mail addresses. Dudley participated in this activity and her cards were available to any potential new customer. The benefits banking employer customers were

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Jason L. Collins' occupational disease claim involving cumulative trauma to his back and right lower extremity sustained while employed as a truck driver/laborer. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that an untimely answer resulted in admission of all facts including legal conclusions about whether the injury arose out of employment.

occupational disease9,505 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of death benefits to the widow of Russell Hayes, a volunteer firefighter killed in the line of duty. The majority awarded death benefits at the statutory minimum wage rate of $40.00 per week, though a dissenting opinion argued for a higher wage determination based on the statutory provisions for calculating average weekly earnings.

occupational disease5,849 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Elizabeth A. Steele for injuries sustained when a patient slammed his leg down on her head, neck, and shoulders while she was working as a critical care unit nurse. The Commission found the award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and determined the employee is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits.

occupational disease10,794 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying compensation to Carl Hanes for an alleged occupational disease from radiation exposure at the Department of Corrections. The Commission found the employee failed to provide proper notice and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, resulting in no benefits awarded.

occupational disease6,305 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's Temporary or Partial Award in a workers' compensation case for employee Cynthia Porter, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's determination that the claimant's diabetes was well-controlled, rejecting the employer/insurer's challenge to this medical finding.

occupational disease7,008 words