Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Jeanette Jones v. Washington University

Decision date: December 1, 20058 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award denying workers' compensation benefits to Jeanette Jones for an alleged psychiatric injury sustained while administering dialysis at Washington University on December 30, 2000. The Commission found that although an accident occurred, it did not arise out of and in the course of employment, making the injury non-compensable under Missouri workers' compensation law.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION

(Modifying Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 00-170529

Employee: Jeanette Jones

Employer: Washington University

Insurer: Colleges and University Trust

Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian

of Second Injury Fund

Date of Accident: December 30, 2000

Place and County of Accident: St. Louis, Missouri

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence, except as modified herein, and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act.

In the second paragraph of the administrative law judge's award, the administrative law judge misstates a stipulation of the parties. We modify the award to correct this misstatement. The parties stipulated the employee sustained an accident but the parties did not stipulate that the accident arose out of and in the course of employment. "Arising out of" was an issue stipulated to be tried.

Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated April 19, 2005, as modified, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Margaret D. Landolt, issued April 19, 2005, is attached and incorporated, with modification, by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 1^{\text {st }}$ day of December, 2005.

NOT SITTING

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

Attest: John J. Hickey, Member

Secretary

AWARD

Employee: Jeanette Jones Injury No.: 00-170529

Dependents: $\quad \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A} \quad$ Before the

Division of Workers'

Employer: Washington University Compensation

Additional Party:Second Injury Fund Colleges and University Trust January 19, 20, and 21, 2005Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:
Hearing Date:Checked by: MDL:tr
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW
1.Are any benefits awarded herein? No
2.Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? No
3.Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
4.Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: December 30, 2000
5.State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Louis, Missouri
6.Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
7.Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
8.Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? No
9.Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
10.Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
11.Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Claimant was administering dialysis when she was fondled by a patient.
12.Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
13.Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Alleged psychiatric injury
14.Nature and extent of any permanent disability: N/A
15.Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: -0-
16.Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? -0-
Employee:Jeanette JonesInjury No.: 00-170529
17.Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? -0-
18.Employee's average weekly wages: $654.98
19.Weekly compensation rate: $436.65/$314.26
20.Method wages computation: Agreement
COMPENSATION PAYABLE
21.Amount of compensation payable: -0-
22.Second Injury Fund liability: No
TOTAL: -0-
23.Future requirements awarded: None

Said payments to begin N/A and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of N/A of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:

N/A

**FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:**

Employee:Jeanette Jones
Dependents:N/A
Employer:Washington University
Additional Party:Second Injury Fund
Insurer:Colleges and University Trust

Injury No.: 00-170529

Before the

**Division of Workers' Compensation**

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri Jefferson City, Missouri

Checked by: MDL:tr

PRELIMINARIES

A hearing was held on January 19, 20 and 21, 2005 at the Division of Workers' Compensation in the City of St. Louis. Jeanette Jones (Claimant) was represented by Ms. Sally Heller. Washington University (Employer) and its Insurer, Colleges and University Trust were represented by Mr. Carl Kessinger. The Second Injury Fund was represented by Assistant Attorney General Dana Ellison. Ms. Heller requested a fee of 25% of Claimant's award.

The parties stipulated that on or about December 30, 2000 Claimant sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of employment; at that time Claimant was an employee of Employer; venue is proper in the City of St. Louis; Employer received the requisite notice of injury; and the claim was timely filed. The parties further stipulated that Claimant was earning an average weekly wage of 654.98 resulting in applicable rates of compensation of 436.65 for total disability benefits and $314.26 for permanent partial disability benefits. Employer has paid no benefits to date.

The issues for determination by hearing are: whether Claimant sustained an accident arising out of and in

the course of her employment; medical causation, Employer's liability for past and future medical expenses; nature and extent of permanent disability; Second Injury Fund liability; and past temporary total disability benefits.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based upon the competent and substantial evidence, I find:

Claimant's Testimony

Claimant is 56 years old and has been married for 33 years. The eldest of ten children, Claimant grew up in Madison, Illinois. Claimant testified that she had a happy childhood. Claimant's family of origin is very close and loving. After graduating from high school, Claimant attended nursing school for two years and obtained her LPN diploma. Claimant is still a certified LPN.

Over the years Claimant has attended some junior college classes. Most recently she attended Phoenix University in May 2001 for a few weeks. She went to class once a week, two to three hours a night. She quit because there was a lot of paperwork and she had difficulty concentrating.

Claimant worked for Employer for twenty-one years. Since May 5, 1980 Claimant worked in the outpatient dialysis department administering dialysis treatment to patients. She served as a team leader and supervised others. Claimant had an exemplary work record and was well respected by her supervisors.

This Claim for Compensation revolves around an incident that occurred on December 30, 2000. At approximately 2:00 p.m., Claimant was bent over a male patient who was in his 60s preparing him for dialysis. She was wearing a v-neck scrub top with a uniform skirt. As Claimant leaned over to prepare the patient, he reached his hand inside her scrub blouse and grabbed her breast. Claimant removed his hand and yelled at him and told him he was not supposed to touch the nurses. The patient looked at her and smiled and said, "I guess I'm in trouble because I am a white man." Claimant advised the patient that it didn't matter what color he was, he was not allowed to touch her. Claimant was shocked, embarrassed, humiliated, and felt degraded. After the incident, Claimant continued to treat the patient because that was her job and she knew that they were shortstaffed on the weekends. The patient remained under her care for approximately three and one-half to four hours. A co-worker, Patricia Jackson, was present a few feet away at the time of the assault. Claimant thought that Ms. Jackson saw the incident. Claimant testified that Ms. Jackson immediately left to report the incident to Kathy York, the charge nurse.

Claimant testified that she left work that day at approximately 7:30 p.m. After she left there, she "broke down" emotionally in her car. Claimant testified that after the incident, co-workers asked her about it. Claimant called Dr. Cohn, the doctor in charge of the dialysis unit. Dr. Cohn reported he was going to talk to her supervisor because he thought she needed to see a counselor. Claimant testified that she spoke to Ms. Colletti-Cook, the Director of Renal Operations, who informed Claimant that Employer did not provide any treatment. Claimant then called April Cotton in Human Resources who also told her that Employer did not provide any treatment for employees in her circumstances.

Claimant continued to work her regular shift. She took some prescheduled vacation time in January. At the end of January or beginning of February, she saw a psychiatrist on a referral from her primary care physician. She saw Dr. Davis and Linda Medlock. According to Claimant, she was a complete wreck and had lost all of her confidence. She did her best and continued to work. She tried not to talk about what had happened too much, but it was upsetting to her when co-workers asked her about it. The first family member she told was her husband, but she didn't tell him right away. It was humiliating and she thought she could handle it on her own. Dr. Davis took her off work and she applied for FMLA. She used her vacation and sick days. Claimant did not receive any workers' compensation benefits while Dr. Davis had her off work. Claimant never returned to work for Employer. She wrote a letter of resignation to Toni Colletti-Cook.

In the twenty years Claimant worked for Employer, no patient had ever grabbed her sexually. Claimant testified that she thought the sexual assault was extraordinary and unusual in her nursing career.

Claimant testified that she stopped treating with Dr. Davis in the spring of 2001 because her health insurance changed. Claimant then saw Pat Sartini, a counselor, and Dr. Zia, a psychiatrist, who provided medications. She then saw Dr. Rutledge and Peggy Galantowicz, a counselor. Claimant had co-pays with all of the doctors that she saw. At one point, her husband's insurance stopped paying for Ms. Galantowicz, and then Claimant paid $\ 65.00 for each visit until she had to stop seeing Ms. Galantowicz. Currently, Dr. Rutledge sees Claimant once a month. She talks to him, and he gives her Xanax for anxiety attacks, and Gavitrol for depression.

Claimant has not looked for a job because she does not feel she is able to do a full-time job, and nursing is all she knows. In order to do nursing, she has to be focused and in charge, but she has lost her confidence. Claimant feels that she is a wreck and just cannot do the job. Claimant has panic attacks and heart palpitations. She is constantly depressed and has crying spells and low self-esteem. She feels unattractive and doesn't socialize much anymore. She sometimes stays in her house for five days at a time, and no longer does housework like she used to. She used to be outgoing and had a lot of confidence, and now she feels inferior. She has severe nightmares about a man chasing her. She falls out of bed, and the right side of her face is numb because she has hit the side of her face on her night table. She fights her husband in her sleep and doesn't get much sleep.

Claimant never saw a therapist or psychologist before the primary injury. Before the prim

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Jason L. Collins' occupational disease claim involving cumulative trauma to his back and right lower extremity sustained while employed as a truck driver/laborer. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that an untimely answer resulted in admission of all facts including legal conclusions about whether the injury arose out of employment.

occupational disease9,505 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of death benefits to the widow of Russell Hayes, a volunteer firefighter killed in the line of duty. The majority awarded death benefits at the statutory minimum wage rate of $40.00 per week, though a dissenting opinion argued for a higher wage determination based on the statutory provisions for calculating average weekly earnings.

occupational disease5,849 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Elizabeth A. Steele for injuries sustained when a patient slammed his leg down on her head, neck, and shoulders while she was working as a critical care unit nurse. The Commission found the award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and determined the employee is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits.

occupational disease10,794 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying compensation to Carl Hanes for an alleged occupational disease from radiation exposure at the Department of Corrections. The Commission found the employee failed to provide proper notice and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, resulting in no benefits awarded.

occupational disease6,305 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's Temporary or Partial Award in a workers' compensation case for employee Cynthia Porter, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's determination that the claimant's diabetes was well-controlled, rejecting the employer/insurer's challenge to this medical finding.

occupational disease7,008 words