Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Roger Alford v. Hussmann Corporation

Decision date: March 23, 20069 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Roger Alford, finding that his alleged occupational disease of the back and knees did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. No benefits were awarded, and the case remains open for potential future proceedings.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
TEMPORARY OR PARTIAL AWARD (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 02-114848
Employee:Roger Alford
Employer:Hussmann Corporation
Insurer:Self-Insuredc/o ESIS
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodianof Second Injury Fund
Date of Accident:Alleged on or before April 26, 2002
Place and County of Accident:Alleged St. Louis County
The above-entitled workers’ compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission for review as provided bysection 287.480 RSMo, which provides for review concerning the issue of liability only. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record concerning the issue of liability, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge in this regard is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms and adopts the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated November 30, 2005.
This award is only temporary or partial, is subject to further order and the proceedings are hereby continued and kept open until a final award can be made. All parties should be aware of the provisions ofsection 287.510 RSMo.
The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Karla Ogrodnik Boresi, issued November 30, 2005, is attached and incorporated by this reference.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 23rd day of March 2006.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
Attest:John J. Hickey, Member

TEMPORARY OR PARTIAL AWARD

Employee: Roger Alford

Injury No.: 02-114848

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Hussmann Corporation

Additional Party: Second Injury Fund

Insurer: Self-Insured c/o ESIS

Hearing Date: September 7, 2005

Before the

Division of Workers'

Compensation

Department of Labor and Industrial

Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Checked by: KOB:tr

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No.
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287?
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? No.
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: alleged on or before April 26, 2002
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Alleged St. Louis County
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? No.
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident happened or occupational disease contracted: Claimant claims he is suffering from an occupational disease of the back and knees due to heavy lifting and requiring immediate treatment.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
  13. Parts of body injured by accident or occupational disease: N/A
  14. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 0
  15. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $\ 0
  16. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? $\ 0
  1. Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 616.00
  2. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 410.67 / \ 329.42
  3. Method wages computation: By agreement

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

0 weeks of temporary total disability benefits

No additional medical treatment

  1. Second Injury Fund liability: No, for temporary award

TOTAL:

  1. Future requirements awarded: None

Each of said payments to begin immediately and be subject to modification and review as provided by law. This award is only temporary or partial, is subject to further order, and the proceedings are hereby continued and the case kept open until a final award can be made.

IF THIS AWARD IS NOT COMPLIED WITH, THE AMOUNT AWARDED HEREIN MAY BE DOUBLED IN THE FINAL AWARD, IF SUCH FINAL AWARD IS IN ACCORDANCE WITH THIS TEMPORARY AWARD.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of N/A which is awarded above as costs of recovery of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: N/A

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Roger Alford

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Hussmann Corporation

Additional Party: Second Injury Fund

Missouri

Insurer: Self-Insured c/o ESIS

Injury No.: 02-114848

Before the

Division of Workers'

Compensation

Department of Labor and Industrial

Relations of

Jefferson City, Missouri

Checked by: KOB:tr

PRELIMINARIES

The matter of Roger Alford ("Claimant") proceeded to hearing to determine whether Claimant is entitled to temporary benefits associated with an alleged occupational disease arising out of and in the course of his employment with Hussmann Corporation ("Employer"). Attorney Donald V. Fraser, Jr. represented Claimant. Attorney E. Thomas Liese represented Employer, which is self-insured c/o ESIS. The Second Injury Fund is a party to the underlying claim, but did not participate in this hearing because Claimant sought a temporary award.

The parties agreed that leading up to April 26, 2002, Claimant was an employee of Employer and earned an average weekly wage of $\ 616.00. The applicable rates of compensation are $\ 410.67 for total disability benefits and $\ 329.42 for permanent partial disability benefits. Venue, notice, and timeliness of the claim are not at issue. Employer paid no workers' compensation benefits.

The Claimant, with Employer's consent, specifically asked for a temporary award on the issues of additional medical treatment and temporary total disability ("TTD"). Therefore, within the narrow scope of the hearing, the issues to be determined are limited to the following:

  1. Does Claimant have an occupational disease of the low back and/or knees ${ }^{[1]}$ arising out of and in the course of employment;
  2. Is the current medical condition of Claimant's low back and/or knees medically casually related to his job activities;
  3. Is Claimant entitled to receive additional medical care to cure and relieve the effects of a work related disease; and
  4. Is Claimant entitled to TTD benefits for any time between April 27, 2002, and the present?

Employer withdrew the potential defenses of notice and statute of limitations after the close of the evidence. Due to medical emergencies faced by both attorneys after this hearing, the Division did not receive the last proposed award until November 15, 2005, sixty-nine days after the last day of hearing.

SUMMARY OF THE EVIDENCE

Claimant is a married resident of Hillsboro, Missouri who began working for Employer in June 1966, and spent nearly his entire career as a Grade II Laborer/Forklift Operator in Employer's commercial refrigeration operation. Most recently he worked on the "less than load" dock where he handled smaller loads for many different customers, including kit parts, and service orders of various shapes, sizes, and weights, varying from a few to several hundred pounds each. He used a forklift to manipulate and move the larger loads, but moved smaller loads by hand.

Claimant testified repeatedly that one could not perform the type of labor he did for over thirty years without having back pain on occasion. In 1992, Claimant complained of back pain and received treatment through the company doctor. He received conservative treatment and was off work approximately six weeks. The conservative treatment resolved Claimant's pain to the back, hip, and top of the thigh. Claimant testified he went to the company doctor and was released, following a physical, to return to work.

In April 2002, Claimant began having sharp, intense pain in his right leg. He had an appointment with his doctor, Dr. Almiron, at the end of April, and received an x-ray of the leg, and physical therapy, but that made him worse. Dr. Almiron referred Claimant to Dr. Padda who provided pain management, an MRI, epidural injections to the back, which helped some, and physical therapy, which aggravated his symptoms. He also received five injections into each knee. Claimant underwent a minimally invasive surgical procedure, which provided some relief. He is still stiff, achy, and hurts all the time. His knees hurt all of the time. Claimant testified that Dr. Padda told him that his back shows evidence of continuous heavy lifting. He claims he did not know his back condition was work related until Dr. Padda told him in 2002. The treatment Claimant underwent consisted of nerve root injections, discogram, and a percutaneous decompression of L3-4 on September 27, 2002.

When his insurance was running out, Claimant questioned how he would obtain future treatment, and Dr. Padda said it should have been handled under workers' compensation all along. Claimant then hired an attorney. Dr. Padda wanted to do another operation, and would not allow Claimant to be released to return to work. Claimant testified he never knew about filing an injury report and he does not remember any information signs regarding workers' compensation posted on Employer's premises. Claimant wants medical treatment and temporary total disability.

On cross-examination, Claimant testified that he has a few head of cattle on a farm, but he has other people to

take care of them. Over the years, he has done some work on a farm but nothing significant. When confronted with documentation of older back injuries in Exhibits 1, 2 and 3, Claimant acknowledged that he had some prior problems with his back and leg that were reported at work. Specifically, in 1998, Claimant acknowledged a report of injury that he made which involved a lower back injury with right leg pain following the lifting of broken parts. On a 1981employment questionnaire, Claimant reported that he had back trouble, but had never had a back injury. In 1992 and 1993, Claimant reported lifting incidents to the nurse with complaints of back pain, and he reported back and right leg pain to Dr. Bailey, who took him off of work for several weeks.

Mike Boone is the manger of Employer's distribution operations, or shipping department, in which Claimant worked throughout most of his career. Mr. Boone confirmed that the size and weight of the boxes Claimant moved in his job varied greatly from very light weights to very heavy, large packages. As a Grade II Laborer/Operator, Claimant drove equipment, but he also lifted heavy weights. Exhibit 5 contains a job summary and analysis of Claimant's job including a listing of the physical requirements of the job. The summary description of Claimant's job is: "Employee's main task is operating the (power industrial) vehicle, not to lift, carry, push or pull. Those activities are varied and intermittent, occurring less than 10 % of the shift." It also indicated fork lift operators such as Claimant never had to lift or carry more than 50 pounds, although they occasionally were called upon to push or pull heavier weights.

Dr. Gurpreet Singh Padda first saw Claimant as a referral from his primary care physician on June 6, 2002. Claimant presented with complaints of chronic intermittent low back pain with an exacerbation several months prior to the referral. The MRI showed degenerative disc disease at L3-4 with cord compression, which was consistent with his symptoms. The successful treatment plan included epidural steroid injections, an EMG, physical therapy, a discogram confirming L3-4 involvement, and ultimately, a closed disc compression or nucleoplasty in September 2002, which resulted in " 100 % resolution of his radicular component low back pain."

Dr. Padda testified that Claimant had

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Jason L. Collins' occupational disease claim involving cumulative trauma to his back and right lower extremity sustained while employed as a truck driver/laborer. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that an untimely answer resulted in admission of all facts including legal conclusions about whether the injury arose out of employment.

occupational disease9,505 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of death benefits to the widow of Russell Hayes, a volunteer firefighter killed in the line of duty. The majority awarded death benefits at the statutory minimum wage rate of $40.00 per week, though a dissenting opinion argued for a higher wage determination based on the statutory provisions for calculating average weekly earnings.

occupational disease5,849 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Elizabeth A. Steele for injuries sustained when a patient slammed his leg down on her head, neck, and shoulders while she was working as a critical care unit nurse. The Commission found the award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and determined the employee is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits.

occupational disease10,794 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying compensation to Carl Hanes for an alleged occupational disease from radiation exposure at the Department of Corrections. The Commission found the employee failed to provide proper notice and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, resulting in no benefits awarded.

occupational disease6,305 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's Temporary or Partial Award in a workers' compensation case for employee Cynthia Porter, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's determination that the claimant's diabetes was well-controlled, rejecting the employer/insurer's challenge to this medical finding.

occupational disease7,008 words