Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Arthur Liberty v. Owens Corning

Decision date: March 29, 20069 pages

Summary

The LIRC affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Arthur Liberty, finding that his alleged low back injury from repetitive job duties as a maintenance worker did not arise out of and in the course of his employment. No compensation was awarded in the case.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 99-181715

Employee: Arthur Liberty

Employer: Owens Corning (Settled September 15, 2004)

Insurer: Insurance Company of Pennsylvania (Settled September 15, 2004)

Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund

Date of Accident: Alleged August 22, 1999

Place and County of Accident: Alleged Kansas City, Wyandotte County, Kansas

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated July 18, 2005, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge R. Carl Mueller, Jr., issued July 18, 2005, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $29^{\text {th }}$ day of March 2006.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Secretary

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION

Dependents:N/A
Employer:Owens Corning (Settled September 15, 2004)
Additional Party:Missouri State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund
Insurer:Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (Settled September 15, 2004)
Hearing Date:June 13, 2005
Briefs Filed:June 29, 2005 Checked by: RCM/rm
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW
1.Are any benefits awarded herein? No
2.Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? No
3.Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? No
4.Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: Alleged, August 22, 1999
5.State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Alleged, Kansas City, Wyandotte County, Kansas
6.Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
7.Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
8.Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? No.
9.Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
10.Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
11.Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Employee alleged that he injured his low back and body as a whole from the repetitive performance of his job duties as a maintenance worker, *e.g.,* running clip hammers, operating forklifts, unloading trucks, sandblasting and water blasting.
12.Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
13.Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Alleged body as a whole
14.Nature and extent of any permanent disability: None
15.Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: None
16.Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? None
17.Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? None
18.Employee's average weekly wages: N/A - issue moot as claim denied
19.Weekly compensation rate: N/A - issue moot as claim denied
20.Method wages computation: N/A - issue moot as claim denied.
21.Compensation Payable: None
22.Second Injury Fund liability: None
23.Future requirements awarded: None
Employee:Arthur LibertyInjury No: 99-181715
Dependents:N/A
Employer:Owens Corning (Settled September 15, 2004)
Additional Party:Missouri State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund
Insurer:Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania (Settled September 15, 2004)
Hearing Date:June 13, 2005
Briefs FiledJune 29, 2005Checked by: RCM/rm
On June 13, 2005, the Employee and the State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund (Fund) appeared for a final hearing. The Division had jurisdiction to hear this case pursuant to §287.110. The employee, Mr. Arthur Liberty, appeared in person and with counsel, Shelly Naughtin. The Fund appeared through Assistant Attorney General David Van Compernolle and Meredith Moser, law intern. The primary issue the parties requested the Division to determine was whether or not the Fund was liable for any benefits pursuant to §287.220. For the reasons noted below, I find that Mr. Liberty failed to sustain his burden of proving either Missouri jurisdiction or qualification for Second Injury Fund benefits.

STIPULATIONS

The parties stipulated that:

  1. On or about August 22, 1999, Mr. Liberty was an employee of Owens Corning; and,
  1. This hearing could be conducted, in Kansas City, Missouri without the Fund waiving its jurisdictional objections.

ISSUES

The parties requested the Division to determine:

  1. Whether Owens Corning was an employer operating subject to Missouri Workers' Compensation law?
  2. Whether Mr. Liberty was an employee working subject to Missouri Workers' Compensation law?
  3. Whether Mr. Liberty sustained an accident arising out of and in the course of his employment?
  4. What was Mr. Liberty's average weekly wage and compensation rates?
  5. Whether Mr. Liberty notified Owens Corning of his alleged injury as required by law?
  6. Whether Mr. Liberty's claim was filed within the time allowed by law?
  7. Whether Mr. Liberty suffered any disability, and, if so, the nature and extent of his disability and whether he is permanently and totally disabled?
  8. Whether the Fund is liable for providing Mr. Liberty with any benefits pursuant to $\S 287.220$ ?

FINDINGS

Mr. Liberty testified on his own behalf and presented the following exhibits, all of which were admitted into evidence without objection:

Exhibit A - Deposition, Dr. Brent Koprivica, 10/12/2004

Exhibit B - Report, Dr. Brent Koprivica, 8/13/2002

Exhibit C - Report, Dr. Brent Koprivica, 8/10/2003

Exhibit D - Report, Dr. Brent Koprivica, 8/30/2004

Exhibit E - Report, Mary Titterington, 5/19/2003

Exhibit F - Medical Records, North Kansas City Hospital

Exhibit G - Medical Records, Dr. Thomas A. Janes

Exhibit H - Medical Records, Kansas City Neurosurgery Group

Exhibit I - Medical Records, Kansas City Neurosurgery Group

Exhibit J - Medical Records, Shawnee Mission Medical Center

Exhibit K - Medical Records, Northeastern Neurological Surgery

Exhibit L - Medical Records, Independent Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine

Exhibit M - Medical Records, Independent Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine

Exhibit N - Medical Records, Liberty Hospital

Exhibit O - Medical Records, Excelsior Springs Medical Center

Exhibit P - Medical Records, Dr. Sidney Cantrell

Exhibit Q - Medical Records, Dr. Sidney Cantrell

Exhibit R - Deposition, Mary Titterington, 5/25/2005

Although the Second Injury Fund did not call any witnesses, it did present the following exhibits, all of which were admitted into evidence:

Exhibit 1 - Claim for Compensation, 4/25/01

Exhibit 2 - Letter requesting consent to see a SIF doctor, 6/19/01

Exhibit 3 - Stipulation of Compromise Settlement, 9/15/04

Exhibit 4 - Report of Dr. Swaim, 3/22/05

Exhibit 5 - Curriculum Vitae of Dr. Swaim

Exhibit 6 - Deposition of Dr. Swaim, 5/26/05

Exhibit 7 - Deposition of Mr. Liberty, 3/19/04

No objections were made to Exhibits 1-5 and 7; objections contained in the deposition of Dr. Swaim were renewed but are overruled.

Based on the above exhibits and the testimony of Mr. Liberty, I make the following findings.

Mr. Liberty is a married, 58-year old male, who lives in Lawson, Missouri. He and his wife have two, adult children, ages 33 and 29. He attended Sacred Heart High School through his sophomore year. He received his G.E.D. from Maple Woods Junior College in 1974. He has not completed any other formal education. Mr. Liberty began working for Owens Corning ("OC") on January 8, 1968. He worked until April of that year and then because of family issues and his father's poor health temporarily moved to Nebraska to help with his father's farm. He testified in his deposition that he simply stopped going in to work. He did not formally resign and he was never formally terminated. Approximately eight months later in December of 1968, Mr. Liberty returned to his employment at OC. Mr. Liberty continued to work for OC until August 22, 1999, the day before his first and only back surgery was scheduled. Prior to working for OC in 1968, Mr. Liberty served in the U.S. Army from 1966-1968 as a communications worker. He testified that he did not have any injuries, illnesses, or conditions prior to starting with OC.

Mr. Liberty held five different positions during his tenure with OC: packer, janitor, spinner/driller, disposal vehicle operator, and service attendant group leader. Mr. Liberty testified on direct examination that he was first hired by OC on December 20, 1968 and continued in varying positions with them until his last day on August 22, 1999. On direct examination, he testified that after a call from one of his brothers, Mr. Liberty interviewed with Luther McCaren at OC's Kansas City, Kansas production plant. Mr. Liberty testified that he was called at his brother's house in North Kansas City, Missouri and told that he had the job. However, on cross-examination, Mr. Liberty revealed that he had nine brothers. He lived with several different brothers at various times after leaving the Army; and, although he claims to remember which brother he was staying with at the time, he did get confused on cross-examination as to where that brother lived. At his deposition he gave a different general location than he did at the hearing. He could not remember the address where his brother lived; he could not remember his brother's phone number. Mr. Liberty also revealed that he had worked for OC on another occasion in January of 1968. At that time, Mr. Liberty went to a group interview of fifteen to twenty people at OC's production plant in Kansas City, Kansas, and was hired to come to work in a couple of days, following a chest x-ray he was asked to provide to employer. The x-ray location was in Kansas City, Kansas. Mr. Liberty never quit during the period between the beginning and end of 1968, but he stopped going into the plant when he moved to Nebraska in April 1968. He also testified that he was never fired.

Mr. Liberty worked for OC as a janitor. In that capacity, Mr. Liberty cleaned floors, cleaned the cafeteria and emptied trash. He testified that he had no workplace injuries during that time period.

In approximately 1973 or 1974, Mr. Liberty moved to the "spinner room" area of OC's Kansas City, Kansas facility. Mr. Liberty's job during this time was to work at a machine as part of a production line. In the fall of 1978, Mr. Liberty slipped on his left foot and hurt his back below the beltline. (There was some discrepancy of testimony, Mr. Liberty's recollection in live testimony was around 1977, but treatment records indicate the slip occurred in 1978). Mr. Liberty walked with help to his supervisor's office and was sent to the hospital where x-rays were negative. Mr. Liberty received a shot in his hip at that time and was kept off work for four days. According to Mr. Liberty, his back never got better after the 1977 incident. His employer added some cabling to help with lifting tanks in the spinner room, but the cables were added to all spinner room tanks and not specifically as an accommodation for Mr. Liberty. Mr. Liberty was able to successfull

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Jason L. Collins' occupational disease claim involving cumulative trauma to his back and right lower extremity sustained while employed as a truck driver/laborer. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that an untimely answer resulted in admission of all facts including legal conclusions about whether the injury arose out of employment.

occupational disease9,505 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of death benefits to the widow of Russell Hayes, a volunteer firefighter killed in the line of duty. The majority awarded death benefits at the statutory minimum wage rate of $40.00 per week, though a dissenting opinion argued for a higher wage determination based on the statutory provisions for calculating average weekly earnings.

occupational disease5,849 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Elizabeth A. Steele for injuries sustained when a patient slammed his leg down on her head, neck, and shoulders while she was working as a critical care unit nurse. The Commission found the award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and determined the employee is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits.

occupational disease10,794 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying compensation to Carl Hanes for an alleged occupational disease from radiation exposure at the Department of Corrections. The Commission found the employee failed to provide proper notice and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, resulting in no benefits awarded.

occupational disease6,305 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's Temporary or Partial Award in a workers' compensation case for employee Cynthia Porter, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's determination that the claimant's diabetes was well-controlled, rejecting the employer/insurer's challenge to this medical finding.

occupational disease7,008 words