Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Christopher Doerr v. Spirtas Industrial Services, Inc.

Decision date: May 31, 200623 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Christopher Doerr for alleged repetitive trauma injuries from striking his head on equipment. The Commission found that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment and therefore was not compensable under Missouri workers' compensation law.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 00-179425

Employee: Christopher Doerr

Employer: Spirtas Industrial Services, Inc.

Insurer: National Union Fire Insurance Company

Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund (Dismissed)

Date of Accident: Alleged May 1, 2000

Place and County of Accident: Alleged St. Louis County

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated October 5, 2005, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Margaret D. Landolt, issued October 5, 2005, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 31st \qquad$ day of May 2006.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

NOT SITTING

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Secretary

AWARD

Dependents:N/ABefore the
Division of Workers’
Employer:Spirtas Industrial Services, Inc., SpirtasCompensation
Wrecking Company and GershensonDepartment of Labor and Industrial
Construction CompanyRelations of Missouri
Additional Party:Second Injury Fund (Dismissed)Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh c/o AIG Claim
Serv., Inc., Zurich North America and American Home Assurance
Co. c/o AIG Claim Serv., Inc.
Hearing Date:July 11, 2005Checked by: MDL:tr

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? No
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? No
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: N/A
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: N/A
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? N/A
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? No
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted:

Employee alleged repetitive trauma from striking his head on the top of a bobcat. 12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A 13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: N/A 14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: N/A 15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: -0 - 16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? -0 -

Employee: Christopher Doerr Injury No.: 00-179425 17. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? -0 - 18. Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 1,037.36 19. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 578.48 / \ 303.01 20. Method wages computation: By agreement

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:
  1. Second Injury Fund liability: No

TOTAL:

  1. Future requirements awarded: None

Said payments to begin N/A and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to Claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of N/A of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to Claimant:

$\mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A}$

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee:Christopher DoerrInjury No.: 00-179425
Dependents:N/ABefore the <br> Division of Workers'
Employer:Spirtas Industrial Services, Inc., Spirtas <br> Wrecking Company and Gershenson <br> Construction Company```Compensation Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri Jefferson City, Missouri```
Additional Party:Second Injury Fund (Dismissed)Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:National Union Fire Ins. Co. of Pittsburgh c/o AIG Claim Serv., Inc., Zurich North America and American Home Assurance Co. c/o AIG Claim Serv., Inc.

PRELIMINARIES

A hearing was held on July 11, 2005 at the Division of Workers’ Compensation in the City of St. Louis. Christopher Doerr ("Claimant") was represented by Mr. Lawrence Willbrand. Mr. John D. Dietrick represented Spirtas Industrial Services, Inc., and National Union Fire Insurance Company c/o AIG Claim Services, Inc. in connection with Injury Numbers 00-179425, 00-179492 and 02-110956. Ms. Jennifer Yates represented Spirtas Wrecking/Spirtas Industrial Services and Zurich North America Insurance Company in Injury Number 02-110956. Mr. Peter Maher represented employer Gershenson Construction Company, Inc. and American Home Assurance Company c/o AIG Claim Services, Inc. in connection with Injury Number 02-110956. Although the Second Injury Fund is a party to this case, pursuant to the agreement of the parties it did not participate at hearing.

The parties stipulated that Claimant was employed by Spirtas Industrial (also known as Spirtas Wrecking Company) from February 29, 2000 through August 5, 2002. Claimant was employed by Gershenson Construction Company from August 16, 2002 to approximately October 21, 2002. He went to work for James Cape \& Son in March 2003.

In terms of coverage, National Union Fire Insurance Company of Pittsburgh c/o AIG Claim Services, Inc. had the coverage for Spirtas Industrial (Spirtas Wrecking) from November 15, 1999 through November 14, 2000. Zurich North America Insurance Company had the insurance coverage for Spirtas Industrial/Spirtas Wrecking from November 15, 2000 through December 31, 2002. Gershenson Construction Company was insured by American

Home Assurance Company c/o AIG on October 21, 2002.

The first Claim for Compensation in Injury Number 00-179425 (filed on February 20, 2003) alleges injuries to the neck and cervical spine with dates of occupational disease of April 2000 and May 2000. The claim was later amended on numerous occasions by Claimant's counsel. The original Claim for Compensation for Injury Number 00-179492 alleges a date of injury of July 1, 2000, and was originally filed on March 31, 2003, again alleging injuries to the neck and cervical spine. The first Claim for Compensation in Injury Number 02-110956 (filed on October 24, 2002) alleges injuries to the neck and cervical spine with a date of injury of October 21, 2002.

The issues for determination by hearing are: Were the Claims for Compensation filed within the time prescribed by law; did Claimant sustain an occupational disease arising out of and in the course of employment; were the claimed work activities the medical cause of Claimant's alleged occupational disease; is Employer liable for the payment of any past medical expenses; is Employer liable for payment of any past temporary total disability benefits; did Claimant sustain any permanent partial disability in relationship to a compensable occupational disease; and, with respect to the October 21, 2002, claim, was there an employee/employer relationship between Claimant and Spirtas Industrial Services on the last claimed date of injury?

Following the trial in this case, Claimant filed a Motion for Leave to Adduce Supplemental Exhibit Q, which is denied.

FINDINGS OF FACT

Based upon the competent and substantial evidence I find:

Claimant's Testimony

Claimant was 29 years old in 2000 when he started working for Spirtas Industrial at the Bevo Building project at Anheuser Busch on the sixth floor. At that time, he was demolishing a solid concrete floor using a bobcat with an attachment on the front, called a brake hammer, which broke up the concrete. Claimant testified that when he broke up the concrete, he frequently encountered hidden items such as old pipes or metal, which caused the brake hammer to abruptly stop. This abrupt stopping jarred the bobcat, causing Claimant to hit his head on the top of the small metal cage that ran over the top of his head. Claimant estimated a clearance of approximately 1 inch between the top of his head and the ceiling of the bobcat. He occasionally wore a hard hat while operating the bobcat but would remove the hard hat to give him more room.

Claimant testified that from April to July 2000, while performing the concrete job, he repeatedly bounced and hit his head on the top of the metal cage. Claimant estimated that this happened 95 % of the time while he was performing the demolition job. Claimant worked from 8 to 12 hours a day with a thirty-minute break, 5 to 7 days a week.

Claimant testified he first noticed pain in the upper left side of his neck, in the side of his shoulder, and down his left arm to the tips of his fingers at the beginning of April 2000. Claimant testified he mentioned his symptoms to the Safety Director, and requested a different machine. He asked the foreman to change the machine, and asked to go to the doctor. According to Claimant, the foreman advised Claimant to go to his own doctor. Claimant also testified that Employer declined changing equipment because they did not want to hassle with using Anheuser-Busch's freight elevators.

Claimant testified that he went to his own physician, Dr. Anzalone. Dr. Anzalone referred Claimant to a neurologist, but when the day came for Claimant to see him, he was told by Employer that he couldn't leave work because there was no one to cover him. At one point Employer had another operator do Claimant's job for 4 or 5 days while Claimant watched from the sideline. Claimant testified his pain decreased while he was on the sidelines, but it continued to hurt when he went back to the demolition job.

Claimant stopped working for Spirtas in August of 2002. The demolition job ended in July, and for the remainder of the time Claimant worked for Spirtas, he used several types of different machines including the bobcat, backhoe, fork truck and rough terrain crane. Many of the machines that he used while at Spirtas caused

his body, including his neck, to be jarred. He testified that the symptoms in his neck continued while he was working for Spirtas after he stopped working on the bobcat, but while he worked on other machines.

After Claimant left Employer, he went to work for Gershenson Construction as a heavy equipment operator. He operated a backhoe and high lift. The job at Gershenson was more physical, and his left arm and neck complaints increased. The symptoms that he felt at Gershenson increased to the point where he had to stop working for Gershenson, and went to see Dr. Martin, a neurosurgeon, on October 15, 2002. Following an MRI, which revealed a disc herniation, Claimant had surgery on October 21, 2002. After his surgery, Claimant was off work for five months, and eventually went back to work for James Cape \& Sons as a heavy equipment operator in March 2003.

Claimant has not had any medical treatment for his neck since he last saw Dr. Martin on December 31, 2002. He does not take any prescription medications at this time, and he is still working as a heavy equipment operator.

No one from Employer sent him to see Dr. Anzalone or Dr. Martin, and he went to them on his own. He never notified Employer that he was going to have surgery and that he was requesting that they pay for surgery for what he thought was a work related condition. He never asked his Employer to pay for the surgery and did not ask them to pay for Dr. Anzalone's treatment. He did not request medical aid or treatment from Employer.

Claimant denied having any c

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Jason L. Collins' occupational disease claim involving cumulative trauma to his back and right lower extremity sustained while employed as a truck driver/laborer. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that an untimely answer resulted in admission of all facts including legal conclusions about whether the injury arose out of employment.

occupational disease9,505 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of death benefits to the widow of Russell Hayes, a volunteer firefighter killed in the line of duty. The majority awarded death benefits at the statutory minimum wage rate of $40.00 per week, though a dissenting opinion argued for a higher wage determination based on the statutory provisions for calculating average weekly earnings.

occupational disease5,849 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Elizabeth A. Steele for injuries sustained when a patient slammed his leg down on her head, neck, and shoulders while she was working as a critical care unit nurse. The Commission found the award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and determined the employee is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits.

occupational disease10,794 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying compensation to Carl Hanes for an alleged occupational disease from radiation exposure at the Department of Corrections. The Commission found the employee failed to provide proper notice and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, resulting in no benefits awarded.

occupational disease6,305 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's Temporary or Partial Award in a workers' compensation case for employee Cynthia Porter, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's determination that the claimant's diabetes was well-controlled, rejecting the employer/insurer's challenge to this medical finding.

occupational disease7,008 words