Based upon the evidence and stipulated facts, I find the following:
The only issue to be answered before this Court is whether claimant's alleged neck condition meets the threshold of a pre-existing disability necessitating Second Injury Fund liability. Based upon the facts as presented, case law and statutory authority, this Court finds claimant's alleged pre-existing disability is not compensable.
Claimant must initially establish he had a compensable work injury against the
Second Injury Fund. Section 287.220.1 RSMo states in order to assess Second Injury Fund liability, claimant must prove "that he or she has permanent disability resulting from a compensable work-related injury." Parties stipulated that claimant did sustain an injury to his right shoulder on March 26, 2002 arising out of and in the course of his employment at Golden Valley Hospital in Clinton, Henry County, Missouri. Further, parties agreed the primary injury of March 26, 2002 to claimant's right shoulder was compensable at 25% permanent partial disability at the 232-week level. Therefore, claimant has proven a compensable work-related injury.
In order to calculate Fund liability, the Commission must determine the percentage of the disability that can be attributed solely to the preexisting condition at the time of the last injury. Gassen v. Liebengood, 134 S.W.3d 75,81 (Mo.App.2004); Carlson, 952 S.W. 2d at 373; see also § 287.220.1. It need not be shown that the claimant or the employer knew of the preexisting disability prior to the work injury.Messex v. Sachs Elec. Co., 989 S.W.2d 206,214 (Mo.App.1999). However, the claimant must establish that an actual or measurable disability existed at this time. Id; see also Tidwell v. Kloster Co., 8 S.W. 3d 585, 589 (Mo.App.1999). The disability must be "of such seriousness as to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to [his] employment." Loven v. Greene County, 63 S.W.3d 278, 283 (Mo.App.2001).
In support of his argument, Mr. Portwood has stipulated he was unaware of he had a pre-existing congenital neck condition and did not receive a diagnosis until after the date of his primary injury, March 26, 2002. Claimant has also stipulated he missed no work associated with the pre-existing disability and did not constitute a hindrance or obstacle to his employment or re-employment. Finally, Mr. Portwood agreed that his neck condition was not symptomatic until after his primary injury.
Claimant submitted evidence from Dr. James Stuckmeyer. Dr. Stuckmeyer's independent medical evaluation clearly states Mr. Portwood was "asymptomatic" and "denied any previous treatment or trauma or symptomatology specific to the cervical spine until March of 2002." He goes on to state "Mr. Portwood informed this examiner that prior to the accident date of March of 2002 that he had absolutely no neck or shoulder complaints." Dr. Stuckmeyer opines Mr. Portwood was "completely asymptomatic in regard to this congenital fusion until the accident date in discussion."
Gassen's language warrants this Court review any alleged pre-existing disability be evaluated on the date of Mr. Portwood's primary injury. Dr. Stuckmeyer's report is clear the claimant had no symptoms associated with the neck until the primary injury. Mr. Portwood has stipulated that his neck condition was not symptomatic at the time of his primary injury. Further, he states his neck condition was not a factor in his ability to maintain employment and was not aware he had the condition at the time of his primary injury. Although Messex states that actual knowledge of a pre-existing disability is irrelevant, it does suggest claimant must have some symptomology associated with a pre-existing condition to rise to the level of compensability even if he knew of his pre-existing condition.
In this case, Mr. Portwood had no symptoms, and no affects to his work abilities due to neck condition before or at the time of his primary injury. Dr. Stuckmeyer's report support these findings. Further, he has no legal argument his neck was a hindrance or obstacle to his employment where he stipulated to the same. Thus, the facts of this case do not support Mr. Portwood having a measurable disability for which this Court can assess liability. Thus, not meeting the threshold of an actual or measurable disability, this Court need not answer the question of whether it arises to a seriousness as to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to his employment.
Therefore, this Court finds no measurable disability associated with the Mr. Portwood's neck condition and any liability for permanent partial benefits against the Second Injury Fund is denied.
A true copy: Attest:
Patricia "Pat" Secrest
Director
Division of Workers' Compensation
Made by: $\qquad$
Mark S. Siedlik
Administrative Law Judge
Division of Workers' Compensation