Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Debra Williams v. City of St. Louis

Decision date: April 17, 200722 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Debra Williams for a neck injury sustained during an inmate altercation on December 11, 1997. Although the injury arose out of and in the course of employment, the Commission found the claim non-compensable under Missouri's workers' compensation law.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 97-481778

Employee: Debra Williams

Employer: City of St. Louis

Insurer: Self-Insured

Cannon Cochran Management Services

Date of Accident: December 11, 1997

Place and County of Accident: St. Louis City, Missouri

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated February 6, 2007, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Suzette Carlisle, issued February 6, 2007, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad$ 17th day of April 2007.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Secretary

AWARD

Dependents:N/ABefore the
Division of Workers’
Employer:City of St. LouisCompensation
Department of Labor and Industrial
Additional Party:N/ARelations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Self-Insured c/o Cannon Cochran Mgmt Services
Hearing Date:October 23, 2006/November 9, 2006Checked by: SC:tr

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? No
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: December 11, 1997
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Louis City
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Claimant was injured during an inmate altercation.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Neck
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: N/A
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 805.25
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $\ 6,206.89

Employee: Debra Williams Injury No.: 97-481778 17. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? N/A 18. Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 445.00 19. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 296.67 / \ 278.42 20. Method wages computation: Stipulated

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

Said payments to begin and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of N/A of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:

Jennifer Finley

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee:Debra WilliamsInjury No.: 97-481778
Dependents:N/ABefore the <br> Division of Workers'
Employer:City of St. LouisCompensation
Additional Party:N/ADepartment of Labor and Industrial <br> Relations of Missouri <br> Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Self-Insured c/o Cannon Cochran Mgmt ServicesChecked by: SC:tr

PRELIMINARIES

A hearing was held at the Missouri Division of Workers’ Compensation, St. Louis office, on October 23, 2006. Debra Williams ("Claimant") requested a Final Hearing pursuant to $\S 287.450$ RSMo. Claimant appeared pro-se. Attorney Robert Hart represented St. Louis City ("Employer") and their self-insured third party administrator, Cannon Cochran Management Services. Assistant Attorney General Michael Finneran represented the Second Injury Fund ("SIF").

The hearing was reopened on November 9, 2006, at the request of Attorney Jennifer Finley for her to present evidence regarding her lien. Ms. Finley stated she did not receive notice of the October 23, 2006 hearing. Attorneys Finley and John Wallach withdrew from representing Claimant and filed liens. Judicial notice is taken of AICS records which show an October hearing notice was sent to Attorney Finley for injury number 97-481778 but not injury number 98-058491. Attorney Wallach was also sent notice of the October hearing.

Claimant appeared pro-se. Attorney Robert Hart represented Employer and Attorney Eileen Krispin represented the SIF. Attorney Jennifer Finley appeared but Attorney Wallach did not. The hearing was limited to evidence regarding Ms. Finley's lien and the record closed after presentation of evidence.

Injury Numbers 97-481778 and 98-058491 were heard together. Although separate awards are issued, the body of each award contains similar issues and the claims are closely related. Hearing venue is correct and jurisdiction properly lies with the Missouri Division of Workers’ Compensation.

The parties have stipulated to the following on or about December 11, 1997:

  1. Claimant was employed by Employer.
  2. Claimant sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employment occurring in St. Louis City.
  3. Employer and Claimant were operating under the provisions of the Missouri Workers’ Compensation law.
  4. Employer's liability was self-insured by Cannon Cochran Management Services.
5.Employer had notice of the injury.
6.A Claim for Compensation was filed within the time prescribed by law.
7.Claimant’s average weekly wage was $445.00.
8.Claimant’s temporary total disability (TTD) rate is 296.67 and the permanent partial disability (PPD) rate is 278.42.
The parties further stipulate:
9.Claimant received $6,206.89 in medical benefits.
10.Claimant received TTD benefits totaling $805.25; representing two and 5/7 weeks of benefits.
The parties agreed that the issues for disposition in this case are:
1.Medical causation;
2.Liability for past medical expenses;
3.Permanent partial disability; and
4.Attorney’s lien.
**SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE**
A ruling was reserved on all exhibits. Any objections not expressly ruled on are overruled. Any notations found on the exhibits were present when offered into evidence.
***Findings and Rulings on Exhibits***
**Claimant:**
1.Exhibit A – Forest Park Hospital records–are excluded based on lack of certification (Section 287.140.7) and hearsay.
2.Exhibit B – Forest Park Hospital/ Dr. Anderson records – are excluded based on Section 287.140.7 and Section 287.210.7.
3.Exhibit C –Social Security records – are excluded based on hearsay and relevance.
4.Exhibit D – Touchette Regional Hospital records - excluded based on Section 287.140.7 and hearsay.
5.Exhibit E – Dr. Volarich’ report - excluded based on Section 287.210.7^{[1]}
6.Exhibit F – Missouri Department of Social Services subrogation letters and Barnes Care records – are excluded based on hearsay and lack of certification under Section 287.140.7.
7.*Exhibit G – Maranatha Health Care, P.C. are admitted. Family Medicine of St. Louis, prescriptions, Healthline, diagnostics, Orthopedic Sports Medicine, and ProRehab are excluded based on hearsay and lack of certification under Section 287.140.7.
8.Exhibit H – St. Louis University Hospital records – are excluded based on hearsay and lack of Section 287.140.7 certification.
9.*Exhibit I –St. Alexius Hospital, Metro West Anesthesia, St. Louis University Hospital, and Dr. Eric Washington records are admitted. Family Medicine of St. Louis, correspondence with former counsel, Orthopedic Sports Medicine, and Forest Park Hospital records are excluded based on hearsay and lack of certification under Section 287.140.7. Social Security Administration records are excluded based on hearsay and relevance.
10.Exhibit J – prescription profile October 31, 2001 to November 25, 2004 –are excluded based on Section 287.210.7 lack of certification.
11.Claimant submitted a number of documents with the post hearing brief which were not admitted as they are hearsay and were not offered at hearing.
**Employer:**
I.Exhibit 2 is admitted as Claimant’s objection was based on the accuracy of the information contained in the record. Accuracy of information goes to weight, not admission. Employer raised lack of certification for the first time in the post-hearingbrief.
**Ms. Finley:**

I. Court's Exhibit I.- admitted

II. Court's Exhibit II. - limited admission ${ }^{[2]}$

* Claimant's Exhibits G and I, Employer's Exhibit 2, and Court's Exhibits I and II are admitted either in whole or in part as described above.

Claimant's Summary

  1. Claimant is 46 years old and began working as a Corrections Officer I for the City of St. Louis at the St. Louis Medium Security facility about nine years ago. Claimant's job was to monitor and maintain the safety and custody of prisoners. Claimant last worked for Employer in June 1999.
  2. Claimant believed co-workers were out to get her after she came forward with information about a co-worker. Claimant testified co-workers tainted her food with rat poison, urine and spit and told her she was going to die. Claimant became depressed after this occurred.
  3. Claimant testified several co-workers "set her up" to be injured on December 11, 1997. Claimant testified co-workers allowed thirty inmates to fight while only Claimant and one guard were on hand. Inmates hit, punched and slammed Claimant into a wall. Claimant treated at Healthline where she requested an MRI but only received x-rays. No records of treatment are in evidence.
  4. On January 9, 1998, fifteen inmates began fighting. Again Claimant was hit, punched and thrown into the wall, injuring her left knee. Claimant returned to Healthline, where her knee was x-rayed and she was given a brace. Claimant was placed on light duty; but Claimant testified Employer did not honor the limitations. No treatment records are in evidence.
  5. Claimant was seen at St. Louis University Emergency Room on July 17, 1998 when she experienced headaches, and pain and numbness on the left side of her body while monitoring prisoners. Claimant was diagnosed with a sprained shoulder and epidural injections were recommended by Dr. Carter.
  6. Claimant testified she has seven 'slipped discs' in her neck, five due to the 1997-98 work injuries. Complaints include pain, headaches and inability to sleep due to the neck pain. Claimant wears a neck brace mainly at night.
  7. Claimant testified she has four or five 'slipped discs' in her low back since December 1997. Claimant testified that an MRI showed curvature of the low back which she attributes to the December 1997 and January 1998 work injuries. She believed the curvature would not have occurred if she had received prompt treatment.
  8. Claimant complained of left knee pain, fluid, and buckling. Claimant testified it took six years to receive surgery for a left knee meniscal tear. As a result of depression, she sleeps, stays home, cannot work, and has been under the influence of medications for six years which she does not believe she needs. Claimant further testified she was over medicated and received treatment from a d

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

dismissed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission issued a final award denying compensation for Jonathan Parker's Second Injury Fund claim following remand from the Missouri Supreme Court. The Court clarified that to qualify for SIF benefits, an employee must have a medically documented qualifying preexisting disability of at least 50 weeks PPD and sustain a subsequent compensable work injury that combines with qualifying disabilities to result in permanent total disability.

neck9,567 words
affirmed

The Missouri Court of Appeals reversed the Commission's initial denial and remanded the case, directing that the Second Injury Fund be held liable for permanent total disability benefits. The Commission issued this final award granting the employee permanent total disability benefits beginning 115 weeks after maximum medical improvement at a weekly rate of $397.28 for life.

neck11,664 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Jerry Sample for an alleged neck injury sustained while delivering loaded rolltainers on January 2, 2017. The Commission found that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, and therefore no compensation was awarded.

neck6,655 words

Saine v. Pepsi Beverages Company(2017)

October 23, 2017#15-069886

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's denial of workers' compensation benefits, finding that the employee failed to establish an identifiable traumatic event or accident as required by Missouri law. The employee's credibility was undermined by multiple inconsistent statements regarding how the alleged neck injury occurred, with varying accounts including lifting, twisting, swerving, and backing up incidents.

neck8,771 words

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Carmelita Estes for a neck injury sustained on January 27, 2012, while working as a housekeeper at the Missouri Veterans Home. The employee was awarded permanent partial disability benefits of 20% to the body-as-a-whole, totaling $20,960 in compensation, plus future medical treatment for the neck injury.

neck13,752 words