Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Johnny Bradshaw v. Ree's Contract Service

Decision date: July 25, 200718 pages

Summary

The Commission reversed the administrative law judge's decision that denied Second Injury Fund liability, finding that the employee's February 2002 cervical spine injury alone did not cause permanent total disability. The employee, a tree climber, suffered a neck injury requiring anterior cervical fusion and subsequently developed psychiatric conditions, with disputes over causation and the Second Injury Fund's responsibility.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION
(Reversing Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 02-016782
Employee:Johnny Bradshaw
Employer:Ree’s Contract Service (Settled)
Insurer:Indemnity Insurance Company of North America (Settled)
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
Date of Accident:February 22, 2002
Place and County of Accident:St. Louis County
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. We have reviewed the evidence, read the briefs of the parties, heard oral argument, and considered the whole record. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, the Commission reverses the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated December 11, 2006.
Preliminaries
The issue stipulated at trial was the liability of the Second Injury Fund.
The administrative law judge determined and concluded that employee sustained permanent and total disability as a result of the reported injury of February 22, 2002 alone. The administrative law judge found that the Second Injury Fund was not liable for permanent and total disability benefits.A timely Application for Review with the Commission was submitted alleging that the award issued by the administrative law judge was erroneous in finding that the February 2002 injury alone caused employee to be permanently and totally disabled.For the reasons set forth in this award and decision, the Commission reverses the administrative law judge’s award.
Summary of Facts
The findings of fact and stipulations of the parties were recounted in the award of the administrative law judge; therefore, the pertinent facts will merely be summarized below.
Employee worked as a climber and trimmer for Bradshaw Tree Service. On February 22, 2002, employee suffered an injury to his neck at work. Employee testified that he was climbing a tree when he reached overhead and felt pain in his neck and right shoulder blade. Employee testified that he suffered a second injury to his lower back at work on April 12, 2002. Employee sought treatment from Dr. Galantz in May of 2002. Employee underwent physical therapy for six weeks. Employee had an MRI of the cervical spine on June 14, 2002 which revealed a disc herniation at C6-7. Dr. Albanna performed an anterior cervical fusion on August 9, 2002. He opined employee was at maximal medical improvement on January 6, 2003. Employee had three epidural steroid injections for ongoing symptoms beginning in August of 2003. After being released by Dr. Albanna, employee did not return to his work for Bradshaw Tree Service. Employee returned to work temporarily for a book shop, but testified that he could not continue working there due to anxiety dealing with people. Employee testified that he experiences panic attacks a few times a week.

Employee was referred to Dr. Guiley for a psychiatric evaluation on August 14, 2003. Dr. Guiley diagnosed employee with a psychiatric condition and prescribed medication. In January of 2004, employee sought treatment from Dr. Openlander. Employee was treated by both Dr. Guiley and Openlander for his anxiety and depression.

Employee settled with the employer for 20\% permanent partial disability to the body due to his cervical injury on February 22, 2002.

Expert Opinions

Dr. Volarich opined that due to the primary injury employee suffered a permanent partial disability of 30 % of the body as a whole referable to the cervical spine. He opined that employee suffered a 20\% permanent partial disability due to his low back injury on April 12, 2002. Dr. Volarich concluded that employee was limited to light duty capacity as a result of his primary injury and that he suffered further disability due to his psychiatric condition. Dr. Liss, psychiatrist, found that employee suffered a 40\% permanent partial disability due to anxiety and depression as a result of his work injury. Dr. Liss concluded that employee was unemployable due to his anxiety and depression.

Dr. Volarich opined that employee suffered 15\% permanent partial disability referable to each wrist due to his preexisting bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome. Dr. Volarich concluded employee suffered 25\% permanent partial disability to the right elbow due to osteoarthritis that pre-existed his primary injury. Dr. Liss opined that employee suffered from attention deficit disorder (ADD) prior to February 22, 2002 even though he had neither been diagnosed nor received treatment for ADD prior to his primary injury. Dr. Liss opined employee suffered 25\% permanent partial disability due to ADD pre-existing the February accident. Dr. Liss also assigned a 10\% permanent partial disability due to pre-existing depression and anxiety.

Delores Gonzalez, vocational expert, evaluated employee on July 9, 2005, and found employee to be unemployable in the open labor market due to a combination of his orthopedic injuries and psychiatric condition.

Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law

Upon careful review of the entire record, including the testimony, as well as the medical records offered and admitted into evidence, the Commission determines and concludes that the more believable evidence supports a finding that the combination of employee's pre-existing disabilities and his work-related injury render employee permanently and totally disabled.

"In order to be entitled to Fund liability, the claimant must establish either that (1) a preexisting partial disability combined with a disability from a subsequent injury to create permanent and total disability or (2) the two disabilities combined to result in a greater disability than that which would have resulted from the last injury by itself." Gassen v. Lienbengood, 134 S.W.3d 75, 79 (Mo.App. W.D. 2004) citing Karoutzos v. Treasurer of State, 55 S.W.3d 493, 498 (Mo.App. W.D. 2001).

"Liability of the Second Injury Fund is triggered only 'by a finding of the presence of an actual and measurable disability at the time the work injury is sustained.'" E.W. v. Kansas City School District, 89 S.W.3d 527, 537 (Mo.App. W.D. 2002), overruled on other grounds, Hampton v. Big Boy Steel Erection, 121 S.W.3d 220 (Mo. banc 2003).

Dr. Liss and Dr. Volarich concluded employee suffered pre-existing measurable permanent partial disabilities. We find that employee has proven pre-existing measurable disabilities that were an obstacle to his employment.

Dr. Volarich noted disability to both upper extremities due to bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome, including lost motion as well as recurrent pain with repetitive motion. Employee's upper extremity limitations were specifically highlighted as an obstacle to his reemployment. Dr. Volarich testified that a combination of his disabilities created a substantial disability and based on his physical disabilities, he was permanently and totally disabled from any work activities above the light duty level. He deferred any analysis or assessment of disability due to his psychiatric condition to a psychiatrist.

Dr. Liss also testified that employee's history and medical records indicated that he suffered from pre-existing depressive disorder and ADD. Dr. Liss concluded that employee's ADD, congenital disorder, was unrelated to the accident but complicated his ability to deal with his disability. Dr. Liss testified that the ADD was something that employee had been dealing with since childhood. Dr. Liss opined attention deficit does interfere with concentration, organization, focus and ability to be efficient.

Ms. Gonzalez described how employee's mental conditions combine with his physical conditions to eliminate him from consideration for all levels of work exertion. Ms. Gonzalez noted that employee had a significant psychiatric history of severe depression, panic disorder, anxiety, and ADHD. She opined that his psychiatric disorders preclude tolerating work stresses, maintaining attention and concentration, and interacting appropriately with co-workers and the public. She also testified that employee's history of carpal tunnel syndrome would play a role in keeping employee from being employable, specifically if he were required to do repetitive work. Ms. Gonzalez concluded the combination of his injuries and psychiatric impairments preclude competitive employment.

The evidence supports Dr. Volarich's opinion that employee suffered a 30\% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole due to his primary injury. This rating accounted for employee's neck pain, lost motion and ongoing headaches. Therefore, we find that employee suffered a 30\% permanent partial disability to the body as a whole referable to the cervical spine as a result of his February 22, 2002 work injury.

Conclusion

Based on the foregoing, the Commission concludes and determines that the combination of employee's preexisting disabilities and his work-related injury render employee permanently and totally disabled. Employee suffered 30\% permanent partial disability due to his primary injury. We find employee suffered the following preexisting disabilities: 15 % permanent partial disability referable to each wrist; 25 % permanent partial disability due to attention deficit disorder; and 10\% permanent partial disability due to depression and anxiety.

Given that employee's permanent partial disability rate and permanent total disability rate are the same, the Second Injury Fund is not responsible for any differential for 120 weeks beginning January 7, 2003. Thereafter, employee shall receive permanent total disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund in the weekly amount of $\ 321.14 for the remainder of his lifetime, or until as modified by law.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Joseph E. Denigan, issued December 11, 2006, is attached solely for reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $25^{\text {th }}$ day of July 2007.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Employee:Johnny BradshawInjury No.: 02-016782
Dependents: N/A
Employer:Ree's Contract Service (Settled)Before the
Additional Party:Division of Workers'
Compensation
Department of Labor and Industrial
Second Injury Fund Relations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri

AWARD

Hearing Date:

September 12, 2006 Checked by: JED:tr

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? No
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: February 22, 2002
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Louis County
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Employee injured neck while climbing/trimming trees and reaching overhead.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: cervical spine; depression, anxiety
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: Permanent total disability against Employer (Settled)
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 9,218.08
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid t

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

dismissed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission issued a final award denying compensation for Jonathan Parker's Second Injury Fund claim following remand from the Missouri Supreme Court. The Court clarified that to qualify for SIF benefits, an employee must have a medically documented qualifying preexisting disability of at least 50 weeks PPD and sustain a subsequent compensable work injury that combines with qualifying disabilities to result in permanent total disability.

neck9,567 words
affirmed

The Missouri Court of Appeals reversed the Commission's initial denial and remanded the case, directing that the Second Injury Fund be held liable for permanent total disability benefits. The Commission issued this final award granting the employee permanent total disability benefits beginning 115 weeks after maximum medical improvement at a weekly rate of $397.28 for life.

neck11,664 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Jerry Sample for an alleged neck injury sustained while delivering loaded rolltainers on January 2, 2017. The Commission found that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, and therefore no compensation was awarded.

neck6,655 words

Saine v. Pepsi Beverages Company(2017)

October 23, 2017#15-069886

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's denial of workers' compensation benefits, finding that the employee failed to establish an identifiable traumatic event or accident as required by Missouri law. The employee's credibility was undermined by multiple inconsistent statements regarding how the alleged neck injury occurred, with varying accounts including lifting, twisting, swerving, and backing up incidents.

neck8,771 words

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Carmelita Estes for a neck injury sustained on January 27, 2012, while working as a housekeeper at the Missouri Veterans Home. The employee was awarded permanent partial disability benefits of 20% to the body-as-a-whole, totaling $20,960 in compensation, plus future medical treatment for the neck injury.

neck13,752 words