Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Edward Michalik v. True Manufacturing

Decision date: September 19, 200734 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Edward Michalik's work-related injury on January 11, 2005. The majority affirmed the decision, though a dissenting opinion argued the administrative law judge erred in denying benefits for the right shoulder injury, which the dissent contended was causally related to the work accident.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 05-002579
Employee:Edward Michalik
Employer:True Manufacturing
Insurer:Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund (Open)
Date of Accident:January 11, 2005
Place and County of Accident:Franklin County, Missouri
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided bysection 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commissionfinds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated January 25, 2007. The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Leslie E. H. Brown, issued January 25, 2007, is attached and incorporated by this reference.The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge’s allowance of attorney’s fee herein as being fair and reasonable.Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 19th day of September 2007.LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
DISSENTING OPINION FILED
John J. Hickey, Member
Attest:
***_******_******_***____Secretary
DISSENTING OPINION
After a review of the entire record as a whole, and consideration of the relevant provisions of the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Law, I believe the decision of the administrative law judge should bemodified.I agree with the administrative law judge’s denial of benefits with regard to employee’s right elbow and wrist

injuries as all symptoms pertaining to those injuries resolved. However, I believe the administrative law judge erred in concluding that employee's work related accident on January 11, 2005 was not a substantial factor in causing his right shoulder injury.

The administrative law judge found that employee failed to prove that his shoulder condition was a result of his work-related injury. The administrative law judge found that the substantial weight of the evidence indicated that employee experienced the right shoulder pain or injury in issue two days after the work related accident, and after work hours, and not on the premises of his employment but rather at home while removing his shirt. However, competent and substantial evidence shows that employee did suffer a shoulder injury on January 11, 2005.

Immediately following his injury, employee sought treatment and complained of pain in his right wrist, elbow and shoulder. Employee underwent x-rays of his wrist and elbow, but none were taken of his shoulder at that time. However, the medical record does indicate that employee had shoulder related complaints immediately following his work-related injury which pre-dated the "pop" he experienced in his right shoulder on the $13^{\text {th }}$ of January. Employee was suffering from an injury which could have been aggravated by other activities, such as removing his shirt. Any subsequent aggravation of his condition would be related to the primary injury on the $11^{\text {th }}$ of January. Therefore, almost certainly the pop employee experienced while removing his shirt was only an aggravation of his January 11, 2005 work-related injury and was not the cause of employee's shoulder injury.

Furthermore, employee has established through the testimony of Dr. Volarich that the work injury sustained on January 11, 2005, was the substantial contributing factor causing employee's right shoulder strain injury. Dr. Volarich opined that as a direct result of the injuries sustained on January 11, 2005, that there was a 20\% permanent partial disability of the right upper extremity rated at the shoulder due to the strain/sprain injury and development of myofascial pain in the trapezius muscle. The rating accounted for the joint strain, which contributed to employee's pain, mild loss of motion, and weakness in the dominant arm.

Therefore, employee has met his burden by establishing that he suffered a work-related injury on January 11, 2005 and that his shoulder condition is medically causally related to the work-related injury. Accordingly, I would modify the decision of the administrative law judge and award compensation for employee's right shoulder injury.

For the foregoing reasons, I respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority of the Commission to deny compensation for employee's right shoulder strain injury.

John J. Hickey, Member

AWARD

Employee: Edward Michalik

Injury No. 05-002579

Dependents: ---

Employer: True Manufacturing

Additional Party: State Treasurer, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund (Open)

Insurer: Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Hearing Date: October 19, 2006

Before the

DIVISION OF WORKERS'

COMPENSATION

Department of Labor and Industrial

Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Checked by: LEHB/lsn

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  1. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: January 11, 2005
  2. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Franklin County, MO
  3. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  4. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  5. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  6. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  7. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  8. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Drilling into a cooler and the drill caught
  9. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? ---
  10. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: right elbow
  11. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: ---
  12. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 0.00
  13. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $\ 1,279.36
  14. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? $\ 2,695.00 (See Award)
  15. Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 452.83
  16. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 301.89 / \ 301.89
  17. Method wages computation: by agreement of the parties

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

Unpaid medical expenses: (Bill for MRI ordered by Dr. Brown) $\ 2,695.00 (See Award)

$21 / 7 weeks of temporary total disability (or temporary partial disability) \ 646.91

--- permanent partial disability from Employer ---

--- weeks of disfigurement from Employer ---

Permanent total disability benefits from Employer beginning --- for ---

Claimant's lifetime

  1. Second Injury Fund liability: Open

TOTAL: $\ 3,341.91

  1. Future requirements awarded: None

Said payments to begin as of date of this Award and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 % of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Edward Michalik

Injury No: 05-002579

Before the

DIVISION OF WORKERS'

COMPENSATION

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Dependents: ---

Employer: True Manufacturing

Additional Party State Treasurer, as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund (Open)

Insurer: Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company

Checked by: LEHB/lsn

This is a hearing in Injury Number 05-002579. The claimant, Edward Michalik, appeared in person and by counsel, Attorney Frank Niesen. The employer/insurer, True Manufacturing Company/Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company, appeared by and through counsel, Attorney Brad McChesney. The claim against the Second Injury Fund is to remain open by agreement of the parties, and the Second Injury Fund was not present at this hearing.

The parties entered in to certain stipulations, and agreements as to the complex issues and evidence to be presented in this hearing.

STIPULATIONS:

On or about January 11, 2005: a. the claimant while in the employment of True Manufacturing Company sustained an injury to his right elbow by accident, arising out of and in the course of his employment occurring in Franklin County, Missouri; b. the employer and employee were operating under and subject to the provisions of the Workers' Compensation law; c. the employer's liability was insured by Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Company; d. the employee's average weekly wage was $\ 452.83, the rate being $\$ 301.89 / \ 301.89.

e. The employer had notice of the injury. f. A Claim for Compensation was filed within the time prescribed by law. g. No temporary total disability benefits have been paid. h. Medical aid has been provided in the total amount of $\ 1,279.36.

ISSUES:

  1. Medical causation in regards to the right shoulder
  2. Liability of past medical expenses
  3. Nature and extent of temporary total disability for the period of January 17, 2005 through February 28, 2005
  4. Nature and extent of permanent partial disability

EXHIBITS:

The following exhibits were admitted into evidence without objection as to the admissibility:

Claimant's Exhibits:

No. A: Medical records from St. Anthony's Medical Center emergency room for two service dates of January 11, 2005, and the second date January 14, 2005

No. B: Itemized bill from St. Anthony's Medical Center referable to Mr. Michalik for the two visits described in Exhibit A respectively for January 11, 2005 in the amount of $\ 932.81 and January 14, 2005 in the amount of $\ 868.00 (Stipulation: these bills are reasonable and necessary care, but the employer and insurer is disputing liability as to the shoulder.)

No. C: Records from BarnesCare

No. D: Medical record from Orthopedic Center of St. Louis/Dr. David Brown, M.D.

No. E: Records from Imaging Partners, 01/24/05 MRI with attached bill

No. F: Records from ProRehab Physical Rehabilitation Center

No. G: Itemized bill from ProRehab referable to Mr. Michalik (Stipulation: these bills are reasonable and necessary and related to the shoulder, but the employer and insurer is disputing liability as to the shoulder.)

No. H: Records from Orthopedic Specialists/Dr. Joseph R. Ritchie, M.D.

No. I: Itemized bill from Orthopedic Specialists/Dr. Ritchie referable to the treatment rendered Mr. Michalik, in the amount of $\ 499.00 (Stipulation: these bills are reasonable and necessary and related to the shoulder, but the employer and insurer is disputing liability as to the shoulder.)

No. J: Bill from South County Radiologists referable to treatment rendered at St. Anthony's Medical Center on 1/11/05 to Mr. Michalik, in the amount of $\ 79.00 (Stipulation: these bills are reasonable and necessary and related to the shoulder, but the employer and insurer is disputing liability as to the shoulder.)

No. K: Bill from South County Radiologists in the amount of $\ 85.00 and is referable to the January 14, 2005 emergency room visit by Mr. Michalik to St. Anthony's Medical Center (Stipulation: these bills are reasonable and necessary and related to the shoulder, but the employer and insurer is disputing liability as to the shoulder.)

No. L: Series of pharmaceutical bills referable to Mr. Michalik's care and treatment, and from various physicians at the emergency room at St. Anthony's Hospital

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

Obermann v. BRM LLC(2022)

September 13, 2022#17-088357

reversed

The Commission reversed the ALJ's award of permanent total disability (PTD) benefits from the Second Injury Fund, finding that while the employee sustained a 22.5% permanent partial disability of the right shoulder from the November 3, 2017 work injury, the PTD resulted from a combination of the primary injury and multiple preexisting disabilities including prior knee and ankle injuries. The Court denied SIF liability for PTD benefits because the employee's PTD was not solely attributable to the primary injury combined with preexisting disabilities exclusive of a compensable 1995 left knee injury.

shoulder11,910 words
affirmed

The LIRC affirmed the administrative law judge's award in a medical fee dispute where Timberlake Surgery Center sought additional reimbursement for authorized left shoulder rotator cuff surgery performed on employee James Noel. The court found the HCP's charges fair and reasonable, and entitled to payment, while denying pre-judgment interest and attorney's fees.

shoulder8,438 words
reversed

The Commission reversed the administrative law judge's award finding that an employee suffered a work-related right shoulder injury on April 27, 2018, when she struck her shoulder on a metal dye plate. The Commission determined that the employee was not entitled to workers' compensation benefits or additional medical care for the alleged injury.

shoulder6,891 words
affirmed

The Missouri LIRC affirmed the administrative law judge's denial of workers' compensation benefits for Keavin Edwards' January 30, 2017 left shoulder injury, finding that the incident aggravated a preexisting condition rather than creating a new compensable injury. The Commission found Edwards' testimony not credible regarding the absence of shoulder problems between his 2008 surgery and the 2017 incident, and adopted medical opinions attributing his 35% permanent partial disability to preexisting degeneration and degenerative arthritis rather than the work incident.

shoulder4,189 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award denying workers' compensation benefits to employee Dwayne Southerland for his September 6, 2011 shoulder injury. One commissioner dissented, arguing the Second Injury Fund should be liable for permanent total disability resulting from the combination of the primary injury and pre-existing conditions.

shoulder4,677 words