Robin Gross v. Gates Corporation d/b/a The Gates Rubber Company
Decision date: November 9, 200715 pages
Summary
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award denying workers' compensation benefits to Robin Gross, finding that no compensable injury or occupational disease occurred. The Commission concluded that the alleged accident or occupational disease did not arise out of and in the course of employment, and therefore no compensation was awarded.
Archive Notice
This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Legal Help
Practical guidance for this decision
Third-Party Injury Check
This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.
- A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
- The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
- A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.
Caption
| Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION | |
| FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION | |
| (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge) | |
| Injury No.: 03-102218 | |
| Employee: | Robin Gross |
| Employer: | Gates Corporation d/b/a The Gates Rubber Company |
| Insurer: | Self-Insured t/p/a Gallagher Bassett Services |
| Date of Accident: | September 15, 2003 |
| Place and County of Accident: | Mississippi County, Missouri |
| The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided bysection 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commissionfinds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated June 28, 2007, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case. | |
| The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Lawrence C. Kasten, issued June 28, 2007, is attached and incorporated by this reference. | |
| Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this ___ 9th _ day of November 2007. | |
| LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION | |
| William F. Ringer, Chairman | |
| Alice A. Bartlett, Member | |
| John J. Hickey, Member | |
| Attest: | |
| Secretary |
ISSUED BY DIVISION OF WORKERS’ COMPENSATION
AWARD
Employer: Gates Corporation d/b/a The Gates Rubber Company
Additional Party: None
Insurer: Self-insured t/p/a Gallagher Bassett Services
Hearing Date: Commenced: February 7, 2007
Checked by: LK/kh
Completed: March 9, 2007
SUMMARY OF FINDINGS
- Are any benefits awarded herein? No.
- Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? No.
- Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? No.
- Date of accident or onset of occupational disease? N/A.
- State location where accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: N/A
- Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
- Did employer receive proper notice? N/A.
- Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? No.
- Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.
- Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
- Describe work employee was doing and how accident happened or occupational disease contracted: N/A.
- Did accident or occupational disease cause death? N/A.
- Parts of body injured by accident or occupational disease: N/A.
- Nature and extent of any permanent disability: N/A.
- Compensation paid to date for temporary total disability: $\ 5,290.00
- Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer-insurer? $\ 13,418.33
- Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer-insurer? N/A.
- Employee's average weekly wage: $\ 475.01
- Weekly compensation rate: $\ 316.67
- Method wages computation: By agreement.
- Amount of compensation payable: None.
Second Injury Fund liability: N/A.
Future requirements awarded: None.
Said payments to begin (see findings) and be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.
The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 % of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: N/A.
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW
On February 7, 2007, the employee, Robin Gross, appeared in person and by her attorney, Steve Taylor for a hearing for a final award. The employer was represented at the hearing by its attorney, Ken McManaman. Also present for the employer was James Moss, its' Human Resource Manager. St. Francis Medical Center filed a Direct Medical Fee Dispute, and a notice of the hearing was sent to St. Francis Medical Center and its' attorney. No one was present for the health care provider at the hearing. At the time of the hearing, the parties agreed on certain undisputed facts and identified the issues that were in dispute. These undisputed facts and issues, together with the findings of fact and rulings of law, are set forth below as follows:
UNDISPUTED FACTS:
- The parties agreed to a change of venue from Mississippi County to Cape Girardeau County Missouri.
- Gates Corporation d/b/a The Gates Rubber Company was operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act and was duly qualified as a self-insured employer through a third party administrator, Gallagher Bassett Services.
- On or about September 15, 2003, Robin Gross was an employee of Gates Corporation d/b/a The Gates Rubber Company.
- The employee's claim was filed within the time allowed by law.
- The employee's average weekly wage was $\ 475.01 and the rate of compensation for temporary total, permanent total and permanent partial disability is $\ 316.67 per week.
- The employer has paid a total of $\ 13,418.33 in medical aid.
- In August of 2004, an advance of $\ 5,290.00 was made to the employee. The employer is entitled to a credit in that amount for any sums awarded for temporary total disability, permanent partial disability or permanent total disability. With regard to any attorney's fees, Mr. Taylor is to be awarded 25 % of the sum after the $\ 5,290.00 credit is taken.
ISSUES:
- Accident or Occupational Disease.
- Notice
- Medical causation
- Claim for previously incurred medical bills.
- Medical fee dispute of St. Francis Medical Center
- Claim for mileage under Section 287.140 RSMo. (During the hearing, the parties agreed that this issue was no longer in dispute. The employer agreed to and shall pay the employee the sum of $\ 772.80 for 2,240 medical miles at 34.5 cents per mile. This agreement was in effect regardless of the rulings on the other issues.)
- Claim for additional or future medical aid.
- Nature and extent of disability
- Attorney's fees and costs under Section 283.203 RSMo and/or 287.560 RSMo for the employee.
EXHIBITS:
The following exhibits were offered and admitted into evidence:
Employee's Exhibits
A. Medical records
B. Withdrawn prior to being offered
| C. Medical bills for low back surgery |
| D. Medical bills for neck surgery |
| E. Deposition of Dr. Levy |
| F. Deposition of Susan Shea |
| G. Incident report |
| H. Gates investigation report |
| I. Copy of stub showing $290.00 issued in May of 2005 |
| J. Social security award |
| K. Monthly medication and costs |
| L. Attorney’s fees and costs |
| Employer’s Exhibits |
| 1. Insurance application of the employee |
| 2. Gates incident report |
| 3. Statement of James Moss |
| 4. Gates associate handbook, personnel policy and picture of notice to report all injuries |
| 5. Medical records of Cape Radiology Group |
| 6. Medical records of Dr. Bryant |
| 7. Medical records of Dr. Critchlow |
| 8. Medical records of Dr. Heath |
| 9. Medical records of Dr. Roberts |
| 10. Medical records of Dr. Katz |
| 11. Report of Donna Abrams (The ruling on admissibility was taken under advisement until the deposition of Donna Abrams was taken. During the deposition, the report was admitted and the employee did not renew the objection. The report is therefore admitted into evidence.) |
| 12. Payments made on claim by employer |
| 13. Deposition of the employee |
| 14. Deposition of Dr. Katz ( Admitted on March 9, 2007) |
| 15. Deposition of Donna Abrams (Admitted on March 9, 2007) |
| 16. Summary of paychecks |
| Witnesses: Robin Gross, the employee; James Moss for employer |
| Briefs: The employee’s brief was received on March 19, 2007. A faxed copy of the employer’s brief was received on March 19, 2007. A mailed copy of the employer’s brief was received on March 20, 2007. |
| SUMMARY OF EVIDENCE: |
| – |
| Testimony of the employee: |
| The employee testified at the hearing and at a deposition on October 9, 2006. |
| Hearing: The employee testified that prior to working at Gates she had no problems with her neck, mid back, low back, or extremities. She did have several kidney stones and repeated urinary tract infections. When she had pain with her urinary tract infections and kidney stones, she had pain in the front and back. Any back pain that she had was related only to her kidney and urinary tract infections. She had no other injuries to her back or leg outside of her work injury. Dr. Jacobs performed a hysterectomy in 2002. She saw Dr. Critchlow on May 30, 2003. The employee stated she was having kidney pain and thought she had a kidney infection. It was the same kind of pain that she had been treated for numerous times before. The pain was on her side and to her low back three inches above the beltline, above her pelvis, and below her rib cage. It was lower than the thoracic area. She showed Dr. Critchlow where she had pain. The pain did not radiate. The urinalysis was normal. Dr. Critchlow did not believe she was passing a kidney stone since there was not any blood in the urine. At that time, she was on Bextra which is an anti-inflammatory for a muscle strain. Dr. Jacobs’s nurse practitioner had prescribed Bextra for a muscle strain under her arm pit. As soon as she was through with Bextra, her problems were solved. Deposition: The employee stated that even though her urinalysis was negative for a urinary tract infection and Dr. |
Critchlow did not diagnose a kidney problem, she was positive that the pain that she was experiencing was kidney pain.
Hearing: The employee was being treated for depression but stated that she did not really have a history of depression. Prior to her injury she was on Zoloft for post traumatic stress syndrome.
There was a notation from a July 9, 2000 record, that the employee had pain in during sex. The employee testified that after the hysterectomy she did not have a problem with that. The past medical history showed depression and anxiety but the employee stated that was not the case. When she saw Dr. Bryant on August 26, 2003, he did a complete physical and she had no back complaints.
On Monday, September 15, 2003, the employee was scheduled to work her usual shift which was from 2:00 to 10:00 p.m. She requested to work over her shift because on Wednesday, September 17, she was going to miss the first 4 hours of her shift due to taking her daughter to a doctor's appointment in St. Louis. She was approved to work an additional 4 hours, until 2:00 a.m. on September 16. Prior to that shift, she had no back or leg pain like she had after. Part of her job was to load boxes of hose spools onto a pallet. She would pick up a box on her right and would pivot to the left with her body to put the box onto a pallet. Around 1:15 a.m. she picked up a box that weighed 20-25 pounds and swung around too quickly, and lost her grip on the box. It startled her and she tightened up her body, arched her back, and caught the box with her chest and arms. She had a significant sharp pain or twinge in her upper low back like someone had stuck a knife in her back. She then put the box on the pallet. For the next few minutes she leaned against the pallet due to the pain and to catch her breath. As soon as she was
Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.