Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Neil Schaffer v. Litton Interconnect Technology

Decision date: January 24, 200818 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to Neil Schaffer for an alleged work-related stress injury occurring on May 2, 2002. The Commission found that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment and therefore was not compensable under Missouri law.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION
(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 02-071252
Employee:Neil Schaffer
Employer:Litton Interconnect Technology
Insurer:Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania
c/o AIG Claim Services, Inc.
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian
of Second Injury Fund
Date of Accident:May 2, 2002
Place and County of Accident:Greene County, Missouri

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated May 16, 2007, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Margaret Ellis Holden, issued May 16, 2007, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $24^{\text {th }}$ day of January 2008. LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member John J. Hickey, Member Attest:

Secretary AWARD

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? NO
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? NO
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? NO
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: N/A
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: N/A
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? YES
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? YES
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? NO
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? YES
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? YES
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: ALLEGED WORK-RELATED STRESS.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? NO Date of death? N/A
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: N/A
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: NONE
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: NONE
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? NONE

Employee: NEIL SCHAFFER Injury No. 02-071252

  1. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? N/A
  2. Employee's average weekly wages: N/A
  3. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 628.90 / 329.42$
  4. Method wages computation: BY AGREEMENT

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

Unpaid medical expenses: 0

0 weeks of temporary total disability (or temporary partial disability)

0 weeks of permanent partial disability from Employer

0 weeks of disfigurement from Employer

Permanent total disability benefits from Employer beginning N/A, for Claimant's lifetime

  1. Second Injury Fund liability: Yes No X Open

0 weeks of permanent partial disability from Second Injury Fund

Uninsured medical/death benefits: O

Permanent total disability benefits from Second Injury Fund:

weekly differential (0) payable by SIF for 0 weeks, beginning N/A

and, 0 thereafter, for Claimant's lifetime

TOTAL: SEE AWARD

  1. Future requirements awarded: NONE

Said payments to begin N/A and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of N/A of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:

RANDALL REICHARD

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Neil Shaffer Injury No. 02-071252

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Litton Interconnect Technology

Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri, as the Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Insurer: Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania c/o AIG Claim Services, Inc.

Hearing Date: $\quad 1 / 10 / 07,1 / 11 / 07,1 / 24 / 07, \& 1 / 25 / 07 \quad$ Checked by: MEH

The parties appeared before the undersigned administrative law judge on January 10, 11, 24, and 25, 2007, for a final hearing. The claimant appeared in person represented by Randall Reichard. The employer and insurer appeared represented by Bill Love and Daniel Malloy. The Second Injury Fund appeared represented by Susan Colburn. Memorandums of law were filed by March 5, 2007.

The parties stipulated to the following facts: On or about May 2, 2002, Litton Interconnect Technology was an employer operating subject to the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. The employer's liability was fully insured by Insurance Company of the State of Pennsylvania c/o AIG Claim Services, Inc. On the alleged injury date of May 2, 2002, Neil Shaeffer was an employee of the employer. The claimant was working subject to the Missouri Workers Compensation

Law. This employment occurred in Greene County, Missouri. The claimant notified the employer of his injury as required by Section, 287.420, RSMo. The claimant's claim for compensation was filed within the time prescribed by Section 287.430, RSMo. At the time of the alleged occupational disease, the claimant's average weekly wage was sufficient to allow a compensation rate of $\ 628.90 for temporary and permanent total disability compensation, and a compensation rate of $\ 329.42 for permanent partial disability compensation. No temporary disability benefits have been paid to the claimant. The employer and insurer have paid no medical benefits. The attorney fee being sought is on an hourly basis up to 25 %. The claim against the Second Injury Fund is dismissed by the claimant at the beginning of the hearing. The exhibits admitted were as follows:

Joint Exhibit:

I. Three volumes, Joint Medical Exhibit - Volumes I and IA are medical records and Volume II is psychological records.

Claimant's Exhibits:

A. Duties of Environmental Engineer

B. Duties of Safety Manager

C. Accident Investigation Report

D. Claimant's note to Dr. Lyons - Summer 2002

E. Periods of Medical Leave - Summer 2002

F. 2002 Environment and Safety Schedule

G. Summary of Claimant's Training Hours

H. Claimant's Job Applications

I. August 1999 Vacation Schedule

J. Report Preparation - 2000

K. List of Employers - Mass Resume' Mailing

L. Duties of Environmental and Safety Manager - May 31, 2002

M. 2001 Annual Report on Environment and Safety

N. Claimant's letter to Fox and O'Connell - August 2001

O. Rebecca Gallay Report

P. Reallocation of ESM Duties - April 22, 2002

Q. Current Project Summary - January 24, 2002

R. Budget for 2002

S. Performance Review - August 1997

T. Performance Review - July 1998

U. Performance Review - July 1999

V. Performance Review - August 2000

W. Performance Review - August 2001

X. Performance Review - January 2002

Y. Dr. Weachter's letter of July 5, 2002

Z. Dr. Lyons letter of October 7, 2002

AA. Memo from Jim Fox dated May 17, 2002

BB. Claimant's letter regarding Korean Regulations

CC. Review of Korean Regulations

DD. Letter to Hector regarding Chicken, Texas of April 4, 1990

EE.Fax from Mark Stanga regarding Chicken, Texas of April 2, 1990 FF. Medical Bill Summary GG. Pharmacy Bill Summary HH. Dr. Lyons’ Report of July 27, 2004 II. Dr. Lyons’ CV JJ. Dr. Lyons’ Deposition of September 24, 2004 KK. Dr. Lyons’ Work Excuse of June 24, 2002 LL. Dr. Lyons’ Work Excuse of July 22, 2002 MM. Dr. Lyons’ Work Excuse of August 20, 2002 NN. Dr. Lyons’ Complete Medical Report dated November 5, 2006 OO. Dr. Darrow’s CV PP. Dr. Darrow’s Report of July 12, 2004 QQ. Training Manual for Chemical Response Team RR. Photograph of Gray Box of Records/Reports from Litton SS. Vocational and Rehabilitation Expert, Phil Eldred’s Report UU. CV of Phil Eldred VV. Deposition of Audie Luna Employer/Insurers Exhibits: 1. Claimant’s Personnel File 2. Deposition of Jim Fox 3. Deposition of Jill Palmer 4. Deposition of Mark Stanga 5. Deposition of Kent Franks 6. Deposition of Dr. Lyons (Part 2) 7. E-mail from Mark Prevedel dated May 22, 2001 8. Job Description for Safety Tech dated August 2000 9. E-mail from Claimant to Dave Edwards dated August 5, 1992 10. Memo from Claimant to Patty Winget regarding Training dated December 1, 1992 11. Memo from Claimant to Dave Edwards regarding New OSHA Regulations dated April 7, 1993 12. Policy/Procedure regarding Occupational Health & Safety dated June 23, 2000 13. Letter from Dr. Daniel F. Lyons to Carl Mentgen regarding Claimant dated June 2, 1998 14. Letter from Claimant to Dr. Lyons regarding stool and history of tachycardia dated sometime after June 12, 1997 15. Environmental and Safety Manager Job Description dated January of 1997 16. Memo from Claimant regarding Chemistry Control on the main System dated May 23, 1997 17. Memo from Claimant to Jeff Criger and Brett Breshears regarding Vacation dated August 3, 2000 18. Memo from Claimant to Mark Prevedel regarding Vacation Time in 2001 dated July 16, 2002 19. Hazardous Waste Management Program Contingency Plan dated January 7, 1994 21. Request for Additional Head Count for the year of 1999 prepared by Claimant dated April 30, 1998 22. Tier II Report dated January 14, 2002 23. EIQ Report dated April 18, 2000 24. Form R Report dated June 26, 2002
25.Waste Summary Report for 2000
26.Summary of Reporting Requirements
27.Memo from Claimant to ECD Operators regarding the Scheduling of Overtime Hours dated March 23, 1996
28.Annual Review of Environmental and Safety prepared by Claimant dated January 8, 2001
29.Letter from Claimant to Dr. Daniel Lyons dated December 7, 1993
30.Letter from Claimant to Dr. Daniel Lyons regarding Iron Content of the Water
31.Letter from Claimant to Dr. Lyons regarding Results of Hearing Test
32.Letter from Claimant to Dr. Lyons regarding stool and history of tachycardia of May 19, 1998
33.Letter from Dr. Daniel Lyons to Claimant dated May 19, 1998
34.Letter from Claimant to Dr. Daniel Lyons and Tod regarding Spicy Foods dated August 23, 2001
35.Letter from Claimant to Dr. Lyons regarding Heart Observations dated May 28, 2002
36.Letter from Claimant to Dr. Daniel Lyons regarding symptoms from May 31 to June 6, 2002
37.Summary of Labor Cost Reductions
38.Summary of Reductions in Force for the years 2001 and 2002
39.Claimant’s Vacation Request (pay adjustment forms)
40.Claimant’s Proposal for an Environmental Safety Department in 1997
41.The Complete Supervisors Incident/Accident Investigation Report dated July 12, 2002
42.CV of Dr. Rosalyn Inniss
44.Deposition of Dr. Rosalyn Inniss
45.Medical Records of Dr. Duey Ballard

ISSUES:

  1. Whether the claimant sustained an occupational disease which arose out of the course and scope of employment.
  2. Whether the occupational disease caused the injuries and disabilities for which benefits are being claimed under Section 287.120.8, RSMo.
  3. Whether the employer is obligated to pay past medical expenses.
  4. Whether the claimant has sustained injuries that will require future medical care in order to cure and relieve the claimant of the effects of the injuries.
  5. Any temporary total benefits owed to the claimant.
  6. The nature and extent of permanent disabilities, including permanent and total disability.

FINDINGS OF FACT:

The claimant is 54 years old. He is married to Jin Sook Shaeffer. He received a Bachelor’s degree with a double major in Biology and Chemistry from the School of the Ozarks in 1977. He Received a Maste

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Jason L. Collins' occupational disease claim involving cumulative trauma to his back and right lower extremity sustained while employed as a truck driver/laborer. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that an untimely answer resulted in admission of all facts including legal conclusions about whether the injury arose out of employment.

occupational disease9,505 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of death benefits to the widow of Russell Hayes, a volunteer firefighter killed in the line of duty. The majority awarded death benefits at the statutory minimum wage rate of $40.00 per week, though a dissenting opinion argued for a higher wage determination based on the statutory provisions for calculating average weekly earnings.

occupational disease5,849 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Elizabeth A. Steele for injuries sustained when a patient slammed his leg down on her head, neck, and shoulders while she was working as a critical care unit nurse. The Commission found the award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and determined the employee is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits.

occupational disease10,794 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying compensation to Carl Hanes for an alleged occupational disease from radiation exposure at the Department of Corrections. The Commission found the employee failed to provide proper notice and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, resulting in no benefits awarded.

occupational disease6,305 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's Temporary or Partial Award in a workers' compensation case for employee Cynthia Porter, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's determination that the claimant's diabetes was well-controlled, rejecting the employer/insurer's challenge to this medical finding.

occupational disease7,008 words