Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Andrew Sutton v. Tom Boyce Excavating, Inc.

Decision date: February 21, 200815 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Andrew Sutton for a left ring finger injury sustained on September 22, 2004 while raking gravel. The Commission approved compensation totaling $32,629.29 including unpaid medical expenses of $25,754.29, temporary disability, permanent partial disability, and disfigurement benefits.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 04-122419
Employee:Andrew Sutton
Employer:Tom Boyce Excavating, Inc.
Insurer:Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance
Date of Accident:September 22, 2004
Place and County of Accident:Christian County, Missouri
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated August 1, 2007. The award and decision of Chief Administrative Law Judge L. Timothy Wilson, issued August 1, 2007, is attached and incorporated by this reference.
The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge’s allowance of attorney’s fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 21st day of February 2008.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
John J. Hickey, Member
Attest:
Secretary
AWARD
Employee:Andrew Sutton
Injury No. 04-122419

Before the

DIVISION OF

WORKERS'

COMPENSATION

Department of Labor and

Industrial Relations of

Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Tom Boyce Excavating,

Inc.

Additional Party: N/A

Insurer: Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance

Hearing Date: June 7, 2007 Checked by:

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? YES
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? YES
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? YES
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: SEPTEMBER 22, 2004
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: CHRISTIAN COUNTY, MO
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? YES
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? YES
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? YES
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? YES
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? YES
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted:

RAKING GRAVEL

  1. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? NO
  1. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: LEFT RING FINGER
  2. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 10 PERCENT
  3. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: -0-
  4. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? -0-
  5. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? $\ 25,754.29
  6. Employee's average weekly wages:
  7. Weekly compensation rate: $\ 250.00
  8. Method wages computation: STIPULATION

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

Unpaid medical expenses: $\ 25,754.29

4 weeks of temporary total disability (or temporary partial disability)

17.5 weeks of permanent partial disability from Employer

6 weeks of disfigurement from Employer

  1. Second Injury Fund liability: NO

Total: $\ 32,629.29

  1. Future requirements awarded: NONE

Said payments to begin IMMEDIATELY and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 PERCENT of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:

ROB BULLOCK

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Andrew Sutton

Before the

DIVISION OF WORKERS'

COMPENSATION

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Dependents: $\quad \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A}$

Employer: Tom Boyce Excavating, Inc.

Additional Party: N/A

Insurer: Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance

Hearing Date: June 7, 2007

AWARD ON HEARING

The above-referenced workers' compensation claim was heard before the undersigned Administrative Law Judge on June 7, 2007. The parties were afforded an opportunity to submit briefs or proposed awards, resulting in the case being submitted to the undersigned for issuance of an award on or about July 9, 2007.

The employee, Andrew Sutton, appeared personally and through his attorney, Rob Bullock, Esq. The employer, Tom Boyce Excavating, Inc., and its insurer, Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance Co., appeared through their attorney, Kevin Rapp, Esq.

The parties entered into a stipulation of facts. The stipulation is as follows:

(1) On or about September 22, 2004 Tom Boyce Excavating, Inc. was an employer operating under and subject to The Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, and during this time was fully insured by Missouri Employers Mutual Insurance Co.

(2) On the alleged injury date of September 22, 2004 Andrew Sutton was an employee of the employer, and was working under and subject to The Missouri Workers' Compensation Law.

(3) The above-referenced employment and alleged accident occurred in Taney County, Missouri. The parties agree to venue lying in Christian County, Missouri. Venue is proper.

(4) The employee notified the employer of his alleged injury as required by Section, 287.420, RSMo.

(5) The Claim for Compensation was filed within the time prescribed by Section 287.430, RSMo.

(6) At the time of the claimed accident the employee's average weekly wage was sufficient to allow a compensation rate of $\ 250.00 for both temporary total disability compensation, and permanent disability compensation.

(7)The employer and insurer have not provided temporary total disability compensation to the employee. However, the parties stipulate that, if the employee is found to have sustained a compensable injury on September 22, 2004, and if it is further found that this incident caused Mr. Sutton to sustain an injury in the nature of an infected finger, the employee suffered four weeks of temporary total disability. (The employee thus seeks four weeks of temporary total disability compensation.)(8) The employer and insurer have not provided medical treatment to the employee.The sole issues to be resolved by hearing include:(1) Whether the employee sustained an accident or incident of occupational disease on or about September 22, 2004; and, if so, whether the accident or incident of occupational disease arose out of and in the course of employment?(2) Whether the alleged September 22, 2004 accident or incident of occupational disease caused the injuries and disabilities for which benefits are now being claimed?(3) Whether the employer and insurer are obligated to pay for certain past medical care and expenses in the amount of $25,754.29?(4) Whether the employee is entitled to 4 weeks of temporary total disability compensation?(5) Whether the employee sustained any permanent disability as a consequence of the alleged accident; and, if so, what the nature and extent of the disability?(6) Whether the employee sustained any permanent disfigurement as a consequence of the alleged accident; and, if so, what is the nature and extent of the disfigurement?
EVIDENCE PRESENTED The claimant testified at the hearing in support of his claim. Also, the claimant offered for admission the following exhibits:
Exhibit ACalendar for September 2004
Exhibit BMedical Bills & Expenses
Exhibit CDeposition of Shane Bennoch, M.D.
Exhibit DDeposition of Alastair D. Haddow, M.D.
Exhibit EMedical Records from Skaggs Community Hospital
The exhibits were received and admitted into evidence
The employer and insurer did not present any witnesses at the hearing of this case. The employer and insurer, however, offered for admission the following exhibits:
Exhibit 1Deposition of Curtis King
Exhibit 2Deposition of Tracey Boyce
Exhibit 3Deposition of David McKinsey, M.D.

Exhibit 4.

Deposition of Andrew Sutton

The exhibits were received and admitted into evidence.

In addition, the parties identified several documents filed with the Division of Workers' Compensation, which were made part of a single exhibit identified as the Legal File. The undersigned took official notice of the documents contained in the Legal File, which include:

Minute Entries

- Request for Hearing-Final Award

- Notice of Hearing

- Answer of Employer \& Insurer to Claim for Compensation

- Claim for Compensation

DISCUSSION

The claimant, Andrew Sutton, is 29 years of age, having been born on September 24, 1977. He resides in Joplin, Missouri with his wife and children.[1]

Mr. Sutton enjoys limited education, as he attended but did not complete the 9th grade. And, he has not obtained a GED. In light of this limited education, Mr. Sutton's employment history is varied, and relates primarily to laborer oriented work. He is presently employed as a dishwasher for Ryan's Steakhouse.

Also, Mr. Sutton's personal history is marked by a criminal record that involves convictions for stealing and writing bad checks. He is presently on probation for this concern, and notes that he has been successful in his probation, and expects to complete the probation in September 2007.

The employer, Tom Boyce Excavating, is a construction business that is engaged in the earth moving phase of construction projects, which includes clearing, general grading, and installation of underground utilities. As an employer, Tom Boyce Excavating employs approximately 65 to 70 employees, who involve primarily operators and general laborers, and secondarily foremen and office staff. The operators are responsible for operating the heavy equipment, including the backhoes and bulldozers. The laborers, which number about 30, are responsible for shoveling, raking and laying and assembling pipe for underground utilities. Additionally, laborers assist the operators in spotting, and perform other laborer oriented work needed at the construction site.

In or around June 2004 Mr. Sutton obtained employment with Tom Boyce Excavating, working as a laborer. Mr. Sutton continued in this employment until being terminated in or around October 2004. As an employee of Tom Boyce Excavating, Mr. Sutton performed labor work that included raking, shoveling, using the pick and such other labor activities as might be presented on a construction project. Notably, he did not wear gloves when engaged in these activities, nor were gloves provided by Tom Boyce Excavating.

Nature of Claim

The parties appear to agree readily that, in September 2004, Mr. Sutton suffered a medical injury or condition in the nature of Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus ("MRSA"), which necessitated receipt of medical care, including hospitalization and surgical interventions. Notably, this medical condition involves a bacterial infection, and is now considered an epidemic concern in the United States. In describing the nature of this medical condition, David McKinsey, M.D. (infectious disease expert for the employer and

insurer) propounded the following comments:

Q. Okay. Can you explain to the Administrative Law Judge what MRSA is or what is the history of MRSA?

A. MRSA is Methicillin-resistent Staphylococcus aureus. Staphylococcus aureus has been an important bacterial cause of infection in humans for ma

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.