Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Ronald Harness v. Southern Copyroll, Inc.

Decision date: July 24, 20087 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for the fatal injury of Ronald A. Harness, Jr., who died in a motor vehicle accident on August 8, 2006, while employed. Benefits were awarded to the employee's widow and dependent children as the injury arose out of and in the course of employment.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 06-086280
Employee:Ronald A. Harness, Jr., deceased
Dependents:Robin Yvonne Harness, widow; Ronald Arthur Harness, III and Elizabeth Fern Harness, dependent children
Employer:Southern Copyroll, Inc.
Insurer:Firstcomp Insurance Company
Date of Accident:August 8, 2006
Place and County of Accident:Greene County, Missouri
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated February 5, 2008. The award and decision of Associate Administrative Law Judge Robert H. House, issued February 5, 2008, is attached and incorporated by this reference.
The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 24th day of July 2008.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
John J. Hickey, Member
Attest:
***_******_******_***____
Secretary
Employee:Ronald A. Harness, Jr. (Deceased)Injury No. 06-086280
Dependents:Robin Yvonne Harness (Spouse) Ronald Arthur Harness, III (Child) Elizabeth Fern HarnessBefore the DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION <br> Department of Labor and Industrial <br> Relations of Missouri <br> Jefferson City, Missouri
(Child)
Employer:Southern Copyroll, Inc.Additional Party N/A
Additional PartyN/AInsurer: Firstcomp Insurance Company
Hearing Date:November 16, 2007Checked by: RHH/meb

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: August 8, 2006
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Greene County, Missouri
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Employee was involved in a motor vehicle accident.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? Yes Date of death? August 8, 2006
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Fatal
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: Fatal
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability:
  16. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer?
  1. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer?
  2. Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 520.46
  3. Weekly compensation rate: $\ 346.99
  4. Method wages computation: Stipulation

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable:

The employer and insurer are ordered to pay to Robin Yvonne Harness the entire death benefit of $\ 346.99 per week which shall include $\ 50.00 per week for each dependent child payable to Robin Yvonne Harness as the natural guardian of said dependent children to be used as she deems appropriate for their support, maintenance, and education. Ronald Arthur Harness, III, at the time of this award, was over the age of eighteen. There was no evidence presented at the hearing as to whether said dependent child continues to meet the definition of total dependent under Section 287.240(4)(b). If Ronald A. Harness, III, is no longer entitled to such benefits under the law, the $\ 50.00 share ordered to be paid to Robin Yvonne Harness as the natural guardian of Ronald Arthur Harness, III, shall be paid directly to Robin Yvonne Harness. Death benefits shall be paid from August 9, 2006, and continuing thereafter. Employer and insurer also shall pay the burial expense agreed upon by the parties to be $\ 2,271.92.

  1. Second Injury Fund liability: No

Total

  1. Future requirements awarded: See above

Said payments to begin immediately and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 percent of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:

William Francis, Attorney

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Ronald A. Harness, Jr.

Injury No: 06-086280

Dependents: Robin Yvonne Harness (Spouse)

Ronald Arthur Harness, III (Child)

Elizabeth Fern Harness

(Child)

Employer: Southern Copyroll, Inc.

Additional Party N/A

Insurer: Firstcomp Insurance Company

Before the

DIVISION OF WORKERS'

COMPENSATION

Department of Labor and Industrial Relations of Missouri

Jefferson City, Missouri

Checked by: $\quad \mathrm{RHH} / \mathrm{meb}$

The parties presented evidence at a hearing on November 16, 2007. Yvonne Harness, the widow of Ronald A. Harness, appeared in person and with her attorney, William Francis. Employer/insurer appeared through their attorney, Kevin Dunaway. Only one issue was presented for determination at the hearing: whether Ronald A. Harness died as a result of an accident arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment. The ultimate issue is whether claimant's being killed while driving an automobile in a "subsidized vehicle" was an accident under Section 287.020.5, RSMo, dealing with going to and coming from work.

The parties agreed that claimant's average weekly wage was $\ 520.46 and that the workers' compensation rate was $\ 346.99 per week for all purposes. Additionally, the parties agreed that there was a burial expense of $\ 2,271.92 which has not been paid by the employer/insurer. The parties agree that the issue of whether those funeral and burial expenses should be paid by the employer fall with the issue of whether Ronald A. Harness died as a result of an accident arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment.

The record was left open until December 8, 2007, for the parties to present additional evidence regarding the nature of a limited liability corporation which may have been considered Claimant's additional employer. However, no evidence concerning an additional employer was presented. The only evidence presented by the parties was that Claimant was an employee of Southern Copyroll, Inc., even though he was performing work on the day of his death for Custom Tool Crafters. Apparently, Custom Tool Crafters was a subsidiary or related entity to Southern Copyroll, Inc. From the evidence in this case, specifically the testimony of Gary L. English, it is clear that he is the sole owner of Southern Copyroll, Inc., a South Carolina corporation. Additionally, it is clear that he is the owner of Custom Tool Crafters, LLC. Southern Copyroll, Inc., has its principal place of business in Fair Grove, Missouri. There are two locations for Southern Copyroll in Fair Grove, with the main business location at 10 West Old Mill Road in Fair Grove, where Ronald A. Harness normally worked. However, at times he would also be assigned to perform work at Custom Tool Crafters located in Ozark, Missouri.

On August 8, 2006, Mr. Harness was directed to work during the afternoon in Ozark, Missouri, at Custom Tool Crafters. He was to be paid for all of the hours he worked that day until the time he left the Ozark facility. However, as was the custom of Southern Copyroll, Mr. Harness also was provided with mileage reimbursement for the entire roundtrip from the principal place of business for Southern Copyroll in Fair Grove, Missouri, to and from the Custom Tool Crafters location in Ozark, Missouri.

Claimant finished his work at approximately 4 p.m. on August 8, 2006. He left the Custom Tool Crafters location near at CC and 65 Highway in Ozark, Missouri, first going to a gasoline station to get fuel for his vehicle. One of the individuals with whom Mr. Harness worked that day, Mr. Church, was also at that gas station. Mr. Harness told Mr. Church that he was going home to Pleasant Hope after getting gas. Mr. Harness had also told his supervisor, Richard Gourley, "that morning that he wanted to go home as soon as he got off work."

Also, on August 8, 2006, Mr. Harness told his stepson, Shawn Keen, that, "He had to stop by work and then he was going home" when he was to leave Custom Tool Crafters. After leaving the gas station, Claimant traveled on Highway 65 North. From the Missouri Highway Patrol Accident Report, it appears that the accident which resulted in Mr. Harness' death occurred three-tenths of a mile before CRD 102 [W] on Highway 65. That location was described by Claimant's widow as being just after Highway 65 crosses Interstate 44. Richard Gourley also testified that he was familiar with the location of Farm Road 102 which apparently is the same as listed in the Accident Report as CRD 102 [W] where it intersects with Highway 65. From Mr. Gourley's testimony, along with that of other witnesses, and as shown on the map marked Exhibit J, Farm Road 102 intersects with Highway 65 just north of the intersection of Highway 65 and I-44 as described by the Highway Patrol Accident Report. As described by Mr. Gourley and others, Highway 65 would be a direct route from the Ozark Custom Tool Crafters in Ozark location to Fair Grove. From the record it appears that Claimant's home was located near Pleasant Hope Missouri, as listed by his wife as 1965 East 558 Road, Pleasant Hope, Missouri. Claimant's stepson indicated a route to go to Claimant's home that would involve the use of Highway CC and H west of Fair Grove, Missouri, in order to go to Claimant's house. From the detailed map set out in Exhibit J, Highway CC intersects with Highway 65 and

continues west of Fair Grove toward Highway H. Pleasant Hope is north and west of Fair Grove.

The issue in this case is whether Mr. Harness died as a result of an accident arising out of and in the course and scope of his employment. Generally, an accident occurring while an employee is going to and from work is not compensable. Cox v. Tyson Foods, Inc., 927 S.W2d 534 (Mo. Banc. 1996). However, there are exceptions to that rule, including the doctrines of extended premises, mutual benefit, and dual purpose. It is clear in this case that Mr. Harness was required to use an automobile for his work. Indeed, Mr. Harness was generally compensated for mileage and was to have been compensated on the day of his death for his travel from the principal business location of Southern Copyroll, Inc., in Fair Grove, Missouri, to and from the Ozark Custom Tool Crafters Facility in Ozark, Missouri. Thus, under existing Missouri case decisions, there would be an exception to the general rule of noncompensability for going to and coming from work ". . . where the employer, because of the distance to the job site or for the convenience of the employer, furnishes the employee's transportation, compensates the employee for use of his own vehicle, or pays the employee for travel time." Garrett

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.