Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Ricky Tyson v. Midwest Transit

Decision date: July 25, 20089 pages

Summary

The Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award of 29.4 weeks of permanent partial disability benefits to employee Ricky Tyson based on the synergistic effect of his work injury and preexisting cardiac condition. The Commission also addressed procedural issues regarding the admissibility of medical testimony and ruled that Dr. Wade's deposition testimony regarding the extent of disability should have been admitted into evidence.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge by Supplemental Opinion)
Employee:Ricky Tyson
Employer:Midwest Transit (Settled)
Insurer:Zurich North America Insurance Co. (Settled)
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
Date of Accident:December 21, 2002
Place and County of Accident:St. Louis City, Missouri
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided bysection 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence, read the briefs, and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Act. Pursuant tosection 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated December 21, 2007, as supplemented herein.
The administrative law judge concluded that employee was entitled to 29.4 weeks of permanent partial disability benefits based on the synergistic effect of employee’s work injury and preexisting cardiac condition. We agree with this conclusion. However, we offer this supplemental opinion to address issues raised by employee in hisbrief.
Dr. Wade was deposed on November 2, 2007. At that deposition, Dr. Wade gave his opinion regarding employee’s extent of disability and the effect of the combination of employee’s work injury and preexisting conditions. This evidence was not in his medical records or reports. The Second Injury Fund made a 7-day Rule objection to this evidence, but did not postpone or request a continuance of the deposition. Instead, the Second Injury Fund continued with the deposition and questioned Dr. Wade. In her award, the administrative law judge sustained the Second Injury Fund’s objection despite the lack of a request for relief.
We believe that the 7-day Rule objection should have been overruled and that Dr. Wade’s testimony should have been admitted into evidence. “When a party does not receive a medical report before a deposition, he has at least two options. First, he can cross-examine the doctor immediately after direct examination. He is free to schedule further cross-examination if he decides it’s necessary. Second, he could postpone all cross-examination until he has had an opportunity to review the testimony and prepare.”Goodwin v. Farmers Elevator and Exch., 933 S.W.2d 926, 929 (Mo.App. 1996) (internal citations omitted).
While the Second Injury Fund raised a 7-day Rule objection, it failed to preserve the objection by requesting relief as described inGoodwin. Counsel for the Second Injury Fund cross-examined Dr. Wade without requesting a postponement or continuance. Since the Second Injury Fund cross-examined Dr. Wade, it will

not be prejudiced by the admittance of his opinions regarding employee's disability. Therefore, in reviewing this matter, the Commission has taken into consideration Dr. Wade's testimony in its entirety.

After reviewing all the evidence on the record, including the medical evidence provided by Dr. Wade, the Commission still agrees with the ultimate conclusion reached by the administrative law judge that employee is entitled to permanent partial disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund for 29.4 weeks based on the synergistic effect of employee's work injury and preexisting cardiac condition.

The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Linda J. Wenman, issued December 21, 2007, is affirmed, and is attached and incorporated by this reference.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 25th day of July 2008.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Secretary

AWARD

Employee:Ricky TysonInjury No.: 02-155590
Dependents:N/ABefore the <br> Division of Workers' <br> Compensation
Employer:Midwest Transit (settled)Department of Labor and Industrial <br> Relations of Missouri
Additional Party:Second Injury FundJefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Zurich North America Insurance Co. (settled)
Hearing Date:December 4, 2007Checked by: LJW

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes

- Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes

  1. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes

- Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: December 21, 2002

- State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: St. Louis City, MO

  1. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  2. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
  3. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes

- Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes

  1. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
  2. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: While unloading a mail delivery, Claimant fell on the dock stairs injuring his left knee.
  3. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No
  4. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Bilateral knees

- Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 55\% PPD referable to the left knee, and 17.5\% PPD referable to the right knee, paid by employer/insurer.

  1. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 27,569.48 representing 42 weeks.
  2. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $\ 65,551.76

Employee: Ricky Tyson

Injury No.: 02-155590

  1. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? None

- Employee's average weekly wages: Sufficient for maximum rates.

  1. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 649.32 / \ 340.12
  2. Method wages computation: Stipulated

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Second Injury Fund liability: Yes

29.4 weeks of permanent partial disability from Second Injury Fund

  1. Future requirements awarded: None

Said payments to begin immediately and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 % of all payments in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant: James Guirl

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee:Ricky TysonInjury No.: 02-155590
Dependents:N/ABefore the
Employer:Midwest Transit, Inc. (settled)Division of Workers'
Additional Party:Second Injury FundCompensation
Department of Labor and Industrial
Relations of Missouri
Jefferson City, Missouri
Insurer:Zurich North American Ins. Co. (settled)Checked by: LJW

PRELIMINARIES

A hearing for final award was held regarding the Second Injury Fund portion of the above referenced Workers' Compensation claim by the undersigned Administrative Law Judge on December 4, 2007. The parties were given until December 18, 2007 to submit post-trial memorandums if they desired. The case was submitted on December 18, 2007 without receipt of post-trial memorandums. Attorney James Guirl represented Ricky Tyson (Claimant). Assistant Attorney General Toni Camp represented the Second Injury Fund (SIF).

Prior to the start of the hearing the parties identified the issue for disposition in this case as the liability of SIF for permanent total disability (PTD), or permanent partial disability (PPD) benefits. Claimant offered Exhibits A-O. Only deposition objections were preserved, and the exhibits were admitted into the record without further objection. In Exhibit L, SIF objected to any opinions rendered by Dr. Wade regarding Claimant's permanent total disability status or his employability, as prior to the deposition Dr. Wade had never rendered such an opinion. Dr. Wade's medical records were not placed in evidence at deposition or trial. No physicians report or medical records of Dr. Wade exist. SIF's objections contained in Exhibit L are sustained.

Any markings contained within any exhibit were present when received, and the markings did not influence the evidentiary weight given the exhibit. Any objections not expressly ruled on in this award are overruled.

FINDINGS OF FACT

All evidence presented has been reviewed. Only testimony and evidence necessary to support this award will be reviewed and summarized.

  1. Claimant is 53 years old, completed the 10th grade, and later obtained a GED. Claimant has not received additional educational or vocational training. Claimant has worked in various jobs as a construction truck driver since completing his education. Since 1999, Claimant has worked as a truck driver for several companies hauling U.S. mail.
  2. On December 21, 2002, Claimant was working for Employer hauling U.S. mail, and while delivering mail he fell on the dock steps striking his left knee. Claimant received initial care from orthopedist, Dr. Stein, who diagnosed a medial meniscus tear and degenerative arthritis. Left knee surgery was recommended and performed. Postoperatively, Claimant continued to experience left knee pain, and came under the care of Dr. Strickland, an orthopedist.
  3. Ultimately, Dr. Strickland performed a left total knee replacement on September 19, 2005. Post-operatively, Claimant developed right knee pain due to overcompensation. Dr. Strickland found Claimant to be at maximum medical improvement on April 17, 2006, and recommended Claimant avoid squatting and kneeling. Dr. Strickland opined Claimant was able to return to work as a truck driver.
  4. On November 27, 2007, Claimant and Employer reached a compromise lump sum settlement that represented PPD of 55 % referable to Claimant's left knee, and 17.5 % referable to Claimant's right knee due to the December 21, 2002 injury. Claimant's current knee complaints include: constant pain in both knees; inability to bend his left knee; difficulty climbing stairs; rare to no use of ladders; difficulty standing after 15-20 minutes; difficulty walking after $1 / 2$ block; limits lifting to 50 pounds; frequent use of ice and heat during the day; and the need to elevate his knees to control pain and swelling.
  5. Claimant has a history of coronary artery disease (CAD) with the following medical history leading up to the December 21, 2002 injury, and documented by certified medical records:

2/19/90 - Claimant suffered an anteroseptal myocardial infarction (MI ). He was hospitalized at St. Elizabeth's Hospital, received intravenous TPA, and underwent a cardiac catheterization. The cardiac catheterization demonstrated a 75 % lesion of Claimant's left proximal anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery, and mild obstruction of the right coronary artery (RCA) and circumflex. It was recommended Claimant consider angioplasty.

3/14/90 - Following recurrent chest pain, Claimant underwent an angioplasty at Jewish Hospital. Following the procedure, Claimant's 75 % LAD lesion was reduced to a 20 % lesion.

8/31/90 - Following recurrent chest pain, Claimant underwent a cardiac catheterization at St. Elizabeth's Hospital. The catheterization demonstrated a 60 % lesion of the proximal LAD, a 50 % lesion of the mid LAD, plaque formation of the distal RCA, and plaque formation at the distal circumflex. The physician's final diagnosis was "single vessel CAD with borderline stenosis of the proximal LAD coronary artery at the site of the previous angioplasty, and normal hemodynamics."

9/23/92 - Claimant underwent a thallium stress test. The treadmill portion of the test was negative for myocardial ischemia, and the thallium scan was suggestive

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Missouri LIRC affirmed the ALJ's award finding the employee permanently and totally disabled when considering the combined effects of a work injury and preexisting cardiac condition, but only partially disabled when excluding the cardiac worsening. The decision clarified credibility determinations regarding medical testimony about permanent total disability and remanded issues of non-medical factors in the denial of total permanent disability benefits.

cardiac3,833 words