| Issued by THE LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION |
| FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge by Supplemental Opinion) |
| Employee: | Ricky Tyson |
| Employer: | Midwest Transit (Settled) |
| Insurer: | Zurich North America Insurance Co. (Settled) |
| Additional Party: | Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund |
| Date of Accident: | December 21, 2002 |
| Place and County of Accident: | St. Louis City, Missouri |
| The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided bysection 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence, read the briefs, and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Act. Pursuant tosection 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated December 21, 2007, as supplemented herein. |
| The administrative law judge concluded that employee was entitled to 29.4 weeks of permanent partial disability benefits based on the synergistic effect of employee’s work injury and preexisting cardiac condition. We agree with this conclusion. However, we offer this supplemental opinion to address issues raised by employee in hisbrief. |
| Dr. Wade was deposed on November 2, 2007. At that deposition, Dr. Wade gave his opinion regarding employee’s extent of disability and the effect of the combination of employee’s work injury and preexisting conditions. This evidence was not in his medical records or reports. The Second Injury Fund made a 7-day Rule objection to this evidence, but did not postpone or request a continuance of the deposition. Instead, the Second Injury Fund continued with the deposition and questioned Dr. Wade. In her award, the administrative law judge sustained the Second Injury Fund’s objection despite the lack of a request for relief. |
| We believe that the 7-day Rule objection should have been overruled and that Dr. Wade’s testimony should have been admitted into evidence. “When a party does not receive a medical report before a deposition, he has at least two options. First, he can cross-examine the doctor immediately after direct examination. He is free to schedule further cross-examination if he decides it’s necessary. Second, he could postpone all cross-examination until he has had an opportunity to review the testimony and prepare.”Goodwin v. Farmers Elevator and Exch., 933 S.W.2d 926, 929 (Mo.App. 1996) (internal citations omitted). |
| While the Second Injury Fund raised a 7-day Rule objection, it failed to preserve the objection by requesting relief as described inGoodwin. Counsel for the Second Injury Fund cross-examined Dr. Wade without requesting a postponement or continuance. Since the Second Injury Fund cross-examined Dr. Wade, it will |
not be prejudiced by the admittance of his opinions regarding employee's disability. Therefore, in reviewing this matter, the Commission has taken into consideration Dr. Wade's testimony in its entirety.
After reviewing all the evidence on the record, including the medical evidence provided by Dr. Wade, the Commission still agrees with the ultimate conclusion reached by the administrative law judge that employee is entitled to permanent partial disability benefits from the Second Injury Fund for 29.4 weeks based on the synergistic effect of employee's work injury and preexisting cardiac condition.
The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Linda J. Wenman, issued December 21, 2007, is affirmed, and is attached and incorporated by this reference.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 25th day of July 2008.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
John J. Hickey, Member
Attest:
Secretary