William Schroeder v. Hampton Envelope Company
Decision date: November 19, 20087 pages
Summary
The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's decision denying workers' compensation benefits to the surviving spouse of William Schroeder, finding lack of subject matter jurisdiction for a claim for continuation of permanent total disability benefits following the employee's death on November 29, 2005. No compensation was awarded in this case.
Archive Notice
This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Legal Help
Practical guidance for this decision
Third-Party Injury Check
This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.
- A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
- The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
- A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.
Caption
FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION
(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 86-400024
Employee: William Schroeder, deceased
Claimant: Lynda Schroeder, widow
Employer: Hampton Envelope Company (Settled)
Insurer: Fireman's Fund Insurance Company (Settled)
Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
Date of Accident: December 15, 1986
Place and County of Accident: City of St. Louis, Missouri
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Act. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated June 19, 2008, and awards no compensation in the above-captioned case.
The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge John Howard Percy, issued June 19, 2008, is attached and incorporated by this reference.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this 19th day of November 2008.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
Attest:
John J. Hickey, Member
| Claimant: | Lynda Schroeder, surviving spouse | Injury No. 86-400024 |
| Employee: | William Schroeder, deceased | Before the |
| Division of Workers’ | ||
| Employer: | N/A | Compensation |
| Department of Labor and Industrial | ||
| Additional Party: | Second Injury Fund | Relations of Missouri |
| Jefferson City, Missouri | ||
| Insurer: | N/A | |
| Hearing Date: | March 19, 2008 | Checked by: JHP |
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW
- Are any benefits awarded herein? No, due to lack of subject matter jurisdiction of claim by surviving spouse for continuation of permanent total disability benefits following the death of employee on November 29, 2005
- Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? N/A
- Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? N/A
- Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: N/A
- State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: N/A
- Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? N/A
- Did employer receive proper notice? N/A
- Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
- Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Not against the Second Injury Fund
- Was employer insured by above insurer? N/A
- Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: N/A
- Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No Date of death? N/A
- $\operatorname{Part}(\mathrm{s})$ of body injured by accident or occupational disease: N/A
- Nature and extent of any permanent disability: N/A
| 15. | Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: N/A |
| 16. | Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? N/A |
| Claimant | Lynda Schroeder, surviving spouse |
- Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? N/A
- Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 730.00
- Weekly compensation rate: $\ 261.19 PTD
- Method wages computation: Stipulation
COMPENSATION PAYABLE
- Second Injury Fund liability: No
Noe
Said payments to begin and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law. The compensation awarded to the claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of N/A of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the claimant:
FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:
| Claimant: | Lynda Schroeder, surviving spouse | Injury No. 86-400024 |
| Employee: | William Schroeder, deceased | Before the |
| Employer: | N/A | Division of Workers' |
| Compensation | ||
| Additional Party: | Second Injury Fund | Department of Labor and Industrial |
| Relations of Missouri | ||
| Jefferson City, Missouri | ||
| Insurer: | N/A | Checked by: JHP |
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On January 8, 1992 William Schroeder, employee, was awarded permanent total disability benefits against the Second Injury Fund in Injury No. 86-145915. On November 29, 2005 William Schroeder died of causes unrelated to his work injury. On April 20, 2006 the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission issued an order terminating further benefits under the award of January 8, 1992. The Second Injury Fund stopped paying all benefits pursuant to that order. On October 12, 2007 Lynda Schroeder, surviving widow of William Schroeder, filed a new claim for compensation and requested continuation of the prior benefits. The Second Injury Fund filed an Answer to the claim and raised certain affirmative defenses.
A hearing in this proceeding was held on March 19, 2008. Both parties submitted proposed awards, the last of which filed on May 1, 2008.
STIPULATIONS
The parties stipulated that on or about December 15, 1986:
- the employer and employee were operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law;
- the employer's liability was insured by Fireman's Fund Insurance Company;
- the employee's average weekly wage was $\ 730.00;
- the rate of compensation for permanent total disability was $\ 261.19; and
- the employee sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employee's employment with Hampton Envelope Company occurring in St. Louis City, Missouri.
The parties further stipulated that:
- the employer had notice of the injury, and claims for compensation pertaining to the injury of December 15, 1986, were filed by William Schroeder against employer/insurer and the Second Injury Fund within the time prescribed by law.
ISSUES
The issues to be resolved in this proceeding are:
- whether the Division of Workers' Compensation has subject matter jurisdiction of the claim filed by Lynda Schroeder, surviving spouse of William Schroeder, deceased employee, against the Second Injury Fund for continuation of the permanent total disability benefits previously awarded to her husband for his lifetime;
- if the Division has jurisdiction of this claim, whether the Claim for Compensation filed on October 12, 2007 was filed before the expiration of the period of limitations prescribed by Section 287.430 Mo. Rev. Stat. (2000);
- if the Division has jurisdiction of this claim and if the period of limitations had not expired prior to the filing of the claim herein, whether this claim is barred by res judicata; and
- if the Division has jurisdiction of this claim and if the claim is not barred by the statute of limitation or res judicata, who the dependents of William Schroeder, deceased are.
JURISDICTION
On December 15, 1986 William Schroeder sustained an injury by accident arising out of and in the course of employee's employment with Hampton Envelope Company occurring in St. Louis City, Missouri. Mr. Schroeder filed claims against Hampton Envelope Company and Fireman's Fund Insurance Company, its insurer, and the Second Injury Fund under Injury No. 86-145915. Employee entered into a compromise lump sum settlement agreement with employer and insurer on September 25, 1989. (Claimant's Exhibit C, Page 1)
Following a hearing on the claim against the Second Injury Fund, Administrative Law Judge Edwin J. Kohner found on January 8, 1992 that Mr. Schroeder was permanently and totally disabled as a result of the combination of his preexisting disability and the disability caused by the 1986 work-related injury and ordered the Second Injury Fund to pay Mr. Schroeder the sum of $\ 261.19 per week for "the life of the claimant commencing March 2, 1988" less a credit of $\ 156.71 per week for 191-3/7 weeks for the permanent partial disability benefits paid by the employer and insurer under their settlement agreement with Mr. Schroeder. (Claimant's Exhibit C, Pages 3-4)
William Schroeder died of lung cancer on November 29, 2005.,(Claimant's Exhibit A) On April 20, 2006 the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission issued an order terminating further benefits under the award of January 8,
- (Claimant's Exhibit E) The Second Injury Fund stopped paying all benefits pursuant to that award. Lynda Schroeder, surviving widow of William Schroeder, filed a new claim for compensation on October 16, 2007 and requested continuation of the prior benefits. (Claimant's Exhibit F) The Second Injury Fund filed an Answer to the claim and raised certain affirmative defenses. (Claimant's Exhibit I)
Claimant Lynda Schroeder, the surviving widow of William Schroeder, contends that the Division has jurisdiction of her claim pursuant to Section 287.230.2 Mo. Rev. Stat. (2000) which provides:
Where an employee is entitled to compensation under this chapter for an injury received and death ensues for any cause not resulting from the injury for which he was entitled to compensation, payments of the unpaid accrued compensation shall be paid, but payments of the unpaid unaccrued balance for the injury shall cease and all liability therefor shall terminate unless there are surviving dependents at the time of death.
In Schoemehl v. Treasurer of State of Missouri, 217 S.W.3d 900 (Mo. 2007) the Supreme Court construed Section 287.230.2 and held that an employee's right to compensation for both accrued and unaccrued permanent total disability benefits survives to his dependents, notwithstanding language in Section 287.200.1 which provides that permanent total disability benefits shall be paid "during the continuance of such disability for the lifetime of the employee ...." The Supreme Court held that as Section 287.020.1 defines "employee" to include his or her dependents where the employee is dead, the dependents of a deceased employee become the "employee" within the meaning of Section 287.200.1. The Court construed the phrase "for the lifetime of the employee" to mean "for the lifetime of a deceased employee's dependent(s)." The Court explicitly construed the phrase "during the continuance of disability" to apply only where the employee recovers from his or her disability and implicitly to not apply at all where the employee dies from unrelated causes. Id. at 902-903.
Claimant contends that under the decision in Schoemehl, supra, she survived to her husband's permanent total disability compensation after his death from causes unrelated to the original injury.
A crucial distinction between Schoemehl, supra, and the instant claim is that the employee in Schoemehl died while his case was pending before the Division. No final award had been issued prior to Mr. Schoemehl's death. The hearing for a final award occurred after his death. The issue of survivorship benefits arose before the issuance of the final award. The ALJ found in the final award that employee was permanently and totally disabled, but all benefits terminated on the date of his death, thus denying any benefits to the surviving spouse. The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the final award and the court of appeals affirmed the decision of the Commission. The Supreme Court reversed the award and held that employee's widow was entitled to payment of the unpaid, unaccrued balance of the permanent total disability award.
In the pending case the permanent total award to William Schroeder was final in 1992. By filing a new claim for compensation, Lynda Schroeder is seeking a new award. She requests findings that employee died of causes unrelated to the December 15, 1986 injury, that she is the sole dependent of William Schroeder, and that she survives to his rights under that award. In asking for a finding of dependency, Claimant is seeking to revise the 1992 award, which con
Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.