Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Surajeta Nikoletic v. Green Park Nursing Home

Decision date: December 15, 20109 pages

Summary

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission modified the Administrative Law Judge's award regarding a November 20, 2005 workplace accident, addressing issues of permanent total disability, temporary total disability benefits, and past medical expenses. The Commission's decision considered whether the employee's pre-existing psychiatric condition from prior trauma affected her workers' compensation eligibility and benefits.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION (Modifying Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Employee:Surajeta Nikoletic
Employer:Green Park Nursing Home
Insurer:Commerce and Industry Insurance
Additional Party:Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
This cause has been submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. We have reviewed the briefs, heard the parties’ arguments, and considered the whole record. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, we issue this final award and decision modifying the April 13, 2010, award and decision of the administrative law judge. We adopt the findings, conclusions, decision, and award of the administrative law judge to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the findings, conclusions, decision, and modifications set forth below.
Preliminaries
The parties stipulated that on or about November 20, 2005, employee sustained an accident arising out of and in the course and scope of her employment with employer. The administrative law judge heard this matter to consider: (1) whether employee is entitled to future medical treatment; (2) whether employer is required to pay employee’s past medical bills; (3) whether employer is liable for past temporary total disability benefits; (4) the nature and extent of employee’s disability resulting from the primary injury; and (5) the liability, if any, of the Second Injury Fund for permanent total disability benefits.The administrative law judge found that: (1) employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the primary injury considered alone; (2) employer is liable for temporary total disability benefits in the sum of $291.20 per week, beginning September 6, 2006 to January 29, 2009, for a total of 124.42 weeks, equaling $36,231.10; (3) employee is entitled to future medical expenses for physical and psychiatric treatment as a result of the primary injury; (4) employee’s medical bills were discharged in bankruptcy and, therefore, employer is not responsible for any additional medical bills; and (5) employer is required to pay employee permanent total disability benefits at the rate of $291.20 per week for life as provided by law.Employee filed an Application for Review arguing that the award is erroneous in that it declines to award past medical bills and that the same are due regardless of employee’s bankruptcy status.
Employer filed an Application for Review arguing: (1) the administrative law judge erred in failing to specify whether the 2005 amendments to the Workers’ Compensation Law applied in this matter; (2) the administrative law judge’s ruling that employee was permanently and totally disabled due to the work injury alone is erroneous; (3) employee is not entitled to

- 2 -

**Injury No.:** 05-129528

**Employer:** Surajeta Nikoletic

Findings of Fact

The findings of fact and stipulations of the parties are set forth in the award of the administrative law judge. We have incorporated those findings to the extent that they are not inconsistent with the modifications set forth in our award. Therefore, we address only those findings of fact pertinent to our modification herein.

Pre-existing Psychiatric Disability

Before the work injury in November 2005, employee experienced psychiatric and emotional problems as a result of her traumatic experiences during the Bosnian war. During the war, claimant lost family members, suffered a miscarriage, and lived under the constant fear that she and her family would be killed. Employee experienced flashbacks, crying spells, and depression, which led her to seek psychiatric treatment from her family physician, Dr. Staten. On January 28, 2005, Dr. Staten placed claimant on Fluoxetine, a medication used to treat major depression. Dr. Staten saw claimant three more times for depression before the work injury in November 2005.

On January 3, 2008, Dr. Wolfgram examined employee at the request of employee's attorney. Dr. Wolfgram used a translator to interview employee; he also interviewed employee's husband. Dr. Wolfgram opined that, prior to the work injury of November 2005, employee suffered from post traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) attributable to her Bosnian war experiences, somatization disorder and recurrent mild to moderate depression disorder without psychotic features. Dr. Wolfgram assigned a 15% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole to each of these preexisting conditions. Dr. Wolfgram attributed employee's PTSD to her experiences during the Bosnian war.

On July 9, 2008, Dr. Stillings evaluated employee on behalf of employer. Dr. Stillings used an interpreter to interview employee. Dr. Stillings performed three psychiatric tests and opined that employee suffered from preexisting PTSD attributable to her Bosnian war experiences with secondary depression and personality disorder. Dr. Stillings assigned a 20% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole to the preexisting PTSD and 10% to the preexisting depression and personality disorder.

We find the opinions of Dr. Stillings and Dr. Wolfgram persuasive regarding employee's preexisting psychiatric disabilities attributable to her Bosnian war experiences. We find employee suffered a 20% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole referable to her preexisting PTSD and a 10% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole referable to her preexisting depression and personality disorder.

The Work Injury

Employee suffered a compensable work injury on November 20, 2005, when she hurt her neck attempting to lift a patient. On September 6, 2006, Dr. Mirkin, employee's treating physician, determined that employee was at maximum medical improvement for the work injury. Dr. Mirkin opined that employee was not permanently and totally

**Injury No.:** 05-129529

Injury No.: 05-129528

Employee: Surajeta Nikoletic

- 3 -

disabled and could return to her old job if she was motivated to do so. Dr. Mirkin opined that employee suffered a 10% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole referable to the neck, and a 5% or 10% permanent partial disability of the left eye, as a result of the work injury. With regard to future medical care, Dr. Mirkin stated there was a small chance that employee could develop degenerative changes at another level of her spine that may require treatment.

We find Dr. Mirkin more credible than Dr. Shuter (the other doctor who rated employee's cervical spine and left eye disabilities); we find that employee reached maximum medical improvement for the work injury on September 6, 2006, and that she sustained permanent partial disability of the body as a whole referable to the cervical spine as a result of the work injury. We consider Dr. Mirkin's rating of the cervical spine somewhat conservative; we find that employee sustained a 20% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole referable to the cervical spine. We find Dr. Mirkin's rating as to permanent partial disability of the left eye lacking in credibility: Dr. Mirkin forthrightly admitted that he does not typically rate eyes and that he was surprised when he was asked to do so. We find Dr. Pernoud more credible with regard to the left eye; Dr. Pernoud's records indicate that she found employee to have sustained no loss of visual acuity as a result of the work injury. Accordingly, we find no permanent partial disability referable to employee's left eye condition. We find credible Dr. Mirkin's opinion that employee may need future medical care as a result of the cervical fusion.

Dr. Wolfgram opined that the November 2005 work injury resulted in employee developing a pain disorder, major depressive disorder, and a "reactivation" of employee's preexisting PTSD; Dr. Wolfgram assigned a 20% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole to each condition. Dr. Wolfgram explained that the work injury triggered employee's preexisting PTSD with the result that memories and emotions from the war resurfaced. Ultimately, Dr. Wolfgram opined that employee was permanently and totally disabled due to a combination of her psychiatric problems both preexisting and resulting from the work injury.

Dr. Stillings opined that employee's preexisting PTSD was aggravated by the November 2005 work injury to the extent that employee sustained an additional 2% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole as a result of the work injury. Dr. Stillings observed that, during his interview, employee displayed no psychological distress regarding the work injury or its sequelae. Regarding the Bosnian war, however, employee displayed significant psychological stress: employee was hysterical, labile, and tearful, and was difficult to assess because of her affective presentation. Dr. Stillings opined that employee's reports of auditory and visual hallucinations may have been hysterical presentations rather than truly psychotic symptoms. In the event employee was not truly psychotic, Dr. Stillings opined that, from a psychiatric standpoint, employee was at maximum medical improvement and was able to return to work without restrictions, and that the work injury of November 2005 was not the prevailing factor in employee's need for further psychiatric treatment. However, if employee was having true psychotic symptoms, Dr. Stillings opined that she was permanently and totally disabled due to her non-work-related psychiatric conditions. In his deposition dated January 4, 2010, Dr. Stillings opined that he was then of the opinion that employee was most likely psychotic.

Dr. Brockman provided her testimony in this matter at the request of employee's attorney. Dr. Brockman first saw employee in October 2007 and was employee's treating psychiatrist. Dr. Brockman assigned a 5\% permanent partial disability of the body as a whole to employee's preexisting depression. Dr. Brockman did not diagnose preexisting PTSD, because she did not think employee displayed the required symptoms. Dr. Brockman did not diagnose preexisting personality disorder, citing employee's ability to hold a job and maintain stable relationships prior to the work injury. Ultimately, Dr. Brockman opined that the work injury was the prevailing factor in employee's current psychiatric condition and inability to compete for employment.

We find a number of problems with Dr. Brockman's opinions in this case. Dr. Brockman did not perform any of the psychiatric testing that Dr. Stillings performed. Unlike the other psychiatrists to offer their opinions in this case, Dr. Brockman did not use an interpreter to interview employee. Dr. Brockman admitted that there were a number of instances in which there were difficulties communicating with employee, including misunderstandings and inconsistencies in reporting symptoms. We are most concerned with the fact that Dr. Brockman appears to have had very limited knowledge of employee's Bosnian war experiences. Specifically, Dr. Brockman admitted that she never discussed employee's miscarriage, flashbacks, recurring nightmares, or that employee experienced depression as far back as 2002. Incredibly, Dr. Brockman testified that if employee had never experienced the Bosnian war, employee would be in the same condition that she is in today.

Because Dr. Brockman rendered her findings without a full understanding of employee's war experiences and her history of emotional and psychiatric difficulties predating the work injury, we consider Dr. Brockman's opinions to be of little value as to the nature and extent of disability attributable to the work injury. On the other hand, we find the opinions and testimony of Dr. Stillings credible. We find that, as a result of the work injury, employee sustained a 2 % permanent partial disability of the body as a whole referable to aggravation of her preexisting PTSD. We find that the work injury is not the prevailing factor in employee's need for fu

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Jason L. Collins' occupational disease claim involving cumulative trauma to his back and right lower extremity sustained while employed as a truck driver/laborer. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that an untimely answer resulted in admission of all facts including legal conclusions about whether the injury arose out of employment.

occupational disease9,505 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of death benefits to the widow of Russell Hayes, a volunteer firefighter killed in the line of duty. The majority awarded death benefits at the statutory minimum wage rate of $40.00 per week, though a dissenting opinion argued for a higher wage determination based on the statutory provisions for calculating average weekly earnings.

occupational disease5,849 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Elizabeth A. Steele for injuries sustained when a patient slammed his leg down on her head, neck, and shoulders while she was working as a critical care unit nurse. The Commission found the award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and determined the employee is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits.

occupational disease10,794 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying compensation to Carl Hanes for an alleged occupational disease from radiation exposure at the Department of Corrections. The Commission found the employee failed to provide proper notice and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, resulting in no benefits awarded.

occupational disease6,305 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's Temporary or Partial Award in a workers' compensation case for employee Cynthia Porter, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's determination that the claimant's diabetes was well-controlled, rejecting the employer/insurer's challenge to this medical finding.

occupational disease7,008 words