Peter Carkeek v. Hallmark Cards, Inc.
Decision date: December 17, 2010Injury #06-12543218 pages
Summary
The Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Teresa Carkeek's June 2006 work injury, while clarifying that the Second Injury Fund was not liable for permanent total disability benefits since this was not her last work-related injury. The Commission disagreed with the administrative law judge's reasoning on the Second Injury Fund liability issue but affirmed the overall compensation award and approved the attorney's fees.
Archive Notice
This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.
Related Legal Help
Practical guidance for this decision
Third-Party Injury Check
This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.
- A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
- The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
- A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.
Caption
| FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION | |
| Injury No.: 06-125432 | |
| Employee: | Teresa Carkeek |
| Employer: | Hallmark Cards, Inc. (Settled) |
| Insurer: | Hallmark Cards, Inc. (Settled) |
| Additional Party: | Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund |
| The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers’ Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated March 26, 2010, as modified by this opinion. The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Kenneth J. Cain, is attached and incorporated by this reference except as described herein. | |
| We offer this opinion to explain our disagreement with one legal conclusion of the administrative law judge. At page 12 of his award the administrative law judge states: | |
| The statute also provides that for the Second Injury Fund to be liable for permanent total disability benefits, the disability from the last injury or accident must combine with the employee’s preexisting disability to render the employee permanently and totally disabled. See §287.220 RSMo. 2005. The statue must be strictly construed. §287.800. | |
| Claimant’s June 2006 accident was not her last injury or accident. Claimant alleged a December 2006 work-related injury and she settled that claim against her employer on January 5, 2010. The December 2006 injury was Claimant’s last injury. Strictly construing the statute, the Second Injury Fund could only be liable for permanent total disability benefits in the December 2006 case and not the June 2006 case. Claimant, although initially alleging that she was permanently and totally disabled in the June 2006 case, conceded in her proposed award that permanent total disability benefits should not be awarded in that case. | |
| At page 14 of the award, the administrative law judge reiterates the reasoning quoted above. | |
| As noted above, the legislature has specifically stated that the Second Injury Fund can only be liable for permanent total disability benefits if the disability from the last injury combines with her preexisting disability. § 287.220 RSMo. 2005. |
The June 2006 injury was not Claimant's last injury. Claimant alleged a work-related injury in December 2006. She worked until August 2007 when she stopped working of her own volition. She settled her claim against her employer arising out of the alleged December 2006 injury on January 5, 2010. Claimant not only failed to prove that she was not permanently and totally disabled, the statute does not allow permanent total disability benefits to be awarded against the Second Injury Fund when the case does not involve the last work-related injury. Id.
The administrative law judge's statements quoted above are merely dicta but we write separately to specifically state we do not adopt the above statements of the administrative law judge as we believe they misstate the law.
In all other respects, we affirm and adopt the award of the administrative law judge.
The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 17^{\text {th }}$ day of December 2010.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
John J. Hickey, Member
Attest:
Secretary
FINAL AWARD
Employee: Teresa Carkeek
Injury No: 06-125432
Employer: Hallmark Cards, Inc. (previously settled)
Additional Party: Missouri State Treasurer, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund
Insurer: Hallmark Cards, Inc.
Hearing Date: February 1, 2010
Final brief filed: March 9, 2010
Checked by: KJC/cy
FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW
- Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes
- Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
- Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
- Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: June 5, 2006
- State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Liberty, Clay County, Missouri
- Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
- Did employer receive proper notice? Yes
- Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
- Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
- Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes
- Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Employee, while in the course and scope of her employment with Hallmark Cards, Inc., placed a box on a conveyor belt. Employee alleged that the conveyor belt "caught" the box which "jerked" her arm and caused her left shoulder to pop.
- Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No
Date of death? N/A
- Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: left upper extremity
- Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 35 percent of left upper extremity at 232 week level
- Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: N/A
- Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? N/A
Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Employee: Teresa Carkeek
- Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? N/A
- Employee's average weekly wages: $\ 744.30
- Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 496.20 / 365.08$
- Method wages computation: By agreement
COMPENSATION PAYABLE
- Amount of compensation payable
Unpaid medical expenses: None
N/A weeks for permanent partial disability from employer
N/A temporary total or temporary partial disability
N/A weeks for disfigurement
- Second Injury Fund liability: 27.05 weeks @ $\ 365.08 per week $=\ 9,875.41
- Future requirements awarded: None
TOTAL: $\ 9,875.41
Said payments to begin as of date of the award and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.
The compensation awarded to the Claimant shall be subject to a line in the amount of 25 percent of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the Claimant: Mr. Mark Kelly
FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:
Employee: Teresa Carkeek
Injury No: 06-125432
Employer: Hallmark Cards, Inc. (previously settled)
Additional Party: Missouri State Treasurer, Custodian of the Second Injury Fund
Insurer: Hallmark Cards, Inc.
Hearing Date: February 1, 2010
Final brief filed: March 9, 2010
Checked by: KJC/cy
The Employee settled her claim against her Employer, Hallmark Cards, Inc., on January 5, 2010 based on a permanent partial disability of 35 percent of the left shoulder rated at the 232 week level. The remaining parties, the Employee and the State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund, entered into various admissions and stipulations. The only remaining issue involved whether the Second Injury Fund was liable for compensation.
At the hearing, Ms. Teresa Carkeek (hereinafter referred to as Claimant), testified that she was born on March 25, 1952 and that she had a high school education. She stated that she had no post-high school education or vocational training. She stated that she had no computer training.
Claimant testified that her first job was at a fast food restaurant. She stated that she next worked in day care at a fitness facility for about 5 years. She stated that in addition to her day care duties, she scheduled and fired employees. She stated that she was "pretty" much the manager.
Claimant testified that afterwards she worked in the cafeteria for the Liberty School District. She stated that she worked as a cashier, on the line and in the salad department. She stated that she was in charge of the salad bar department for the last two years of her employment with the district.
Claimant testified that her job at Hallmark Cards was retail order processor. She stated that she had to pick up and fill orders. She stated that she had to do a lot of standing, lifting and walking. She stated that she had to pack, tape and ship boxes. She stated that she pushed a buggy to the various stations to pick up products for shipping.
Claimant testified that the boxes generally weighed 10 to 15 pounds. She stated that occasionally a boxed weighed 35 to 60 pounds. She stated that her June 5, 2006 injury occurred after she had placed a 40 to 60 pound box on the conveyor. She stated that the conveyor belt caught the box and it jerked her arm. She stated that she felt a pop in her shoulder.
Claimant described her initial pain as "breathtaking." She stated that she could hardly move for about five minutes. She stated that her pain was on the top portion of her left shoulder and radiated down into her arm. She also stated that her biceps hurt. She stated that most of her pain was in her left shoulder.
Claimant testified that she continued working despite the alleged pain until the middle of July when she took a three-week vacation. She admitted that she had declined her employer's offer to send her to a doctor during that period. She stated that after her vacation she developed problems with deep vein thrombosis (DVT's) and later chest pains. She stated that while hospitalized with the chest pains, it was determined that she had gallbladder and not cardiac problems.
Claimant testified that she had gallbladder surgery in October 2006 and missed one to two weeks from work. She stated that when she returned to work, her coworkers helped her do her job. She stated that she then developed hemorrhoid problems, which the Coumadin made more serious. She stated that she had a hemorrhoidectomy. She stated that she remained off work until November 2006.
Claimant testified that when she returned to work following the hemorrhoidectomy, Hallmark changed her job to straight line selecting, which was essentially a light-duty job. She stated that on December 13, 2006 she sustained another injury at work. She stated that the injury occurred when she slipped on some boxes, packing foam and cables on the floor. She stated that she began to fall forward and at the same time, she was trying to keep from dropping the cards in her hands. She stated that as she fell forward, she jerked her whole body in a forward direction and felt as though an electric shock had gone through her back. She stated that she experienced stiffness and soreness in her back. She admitted that she did not fall to the floor. She admitted that she did not strike her head, neck, back or hip on any object. She merely stumbled in a forward direction.
Claimant admitted that she worked the remainder of the month. She stated that on January 7, 2007, she had an MRI of her left shoulder which she had injured in June 2006. She stated that Dr.Lingenfelter performed arthroscopic surgery on her shoulder on February 20, 2007. She stated that the surgery did not resolve her problems. She also stated that Dr. Lingefelter wanted to treat her neck injury from the alleged December 2006 accident and recommended an MRI, which Hallmark refused to authorize. She stated that Hallmark also refused to authorize an injection in her neck as prescribed by Dr. Griffith in pain management.
Claimant admitted that she returned to work following the arthroscopic shoulder surgery and that she worked light duty during the summer of 2007. That was more than a year after the June 2006 accident. She stated that she worked the light duty for 90 days.
Claimant testified that she was re-examined by Dr. Lingenf
Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.