The evidence is overwhelming that employee is permanently and totally disabled. Contrary to the findings of the administrative law judge, even employer's medical expert, Dr. Solman, agreed that, given employee's physical condition when he evaluated him on September 22, 2008, employee is disabled from the workforce. The issue is whether employee is permanently and totally disabled as a result of the last injury considered alone or whether it is due to a combination of the effects of the work injury and employee's numerous preexisting disabling conditions.
Of the medical and vocational experts to render an opinion on the question, Ms. Shea was the only one who explicitly indicated she believed employee was permanently and totally disabled as a result of the work injury considered alone. Specifically, Ms. Shea agreed that when she looked at employee's neck surgeries and their effects and the
Depression employee suffered following the 2004 work injury, employee is permanently and totally disabled from the last injury and its sequelae. Ms. Shea was not asked to elaborate and thus the record does not include an explanation as to how she reached this conclusion. Ms. Shea admitted that she did not perform any vocational testing or labor market surveys.
On the other hand, the testimony of Mr. England, Dr. Solman, and Dr. Musich all support a finding that employee is permanently and totally disabled due to a combination of his preexisting disabling conditions and the effects of the work injury. (Dr. Raskas clearly believed employee to be permanently and totally disabled but did not specifically identify whether he believed it was due to the effects of the work injury alone or a combination of the work injury and preexisting factors). Mr. England originally opined that employee is not actually permanently and totally disabled, but conceded on cross-examination that employee can't work and that, if you believe employee's subjective complaints, it's due to a combination of preexisting conditions and the effects of the work injury. Dr. Solman did not specifically opine whether he believed employee is disabled due to the work injury alone or a combination of factors, but his findings minimizing the effects of the work injury, combined with his admission that employee is now disabled from the workforce, indicate that it was not the work injury alone that permanently and totally disabled employee. Dr. Musich testified that employee is permanently and totally disabled due to a combination of his preexisting disabling conditions and the effects of the work injury. Dr. Musich explained he felt employee was permanently and totally disabled due to his many physical restrictions and his need for daily narcotic medications. Dr. Musich acknowledged that employee was working before December 2004 with all of his preexisting disabling conditions, and that employee's need for daily narcotic medications is due to the work injury. Dr. Musich, however, did not relent when he was pressed on cross-examination but rather reaffirmed his opinion that it was the effects of the work injury in conjunction with employee's multiple other preexisting pathologies that render employee permanently and totally disabled. We find Dr. Musich and Mr. England credible.
Because we otherwise agree with the analysis, findings, and conclusions of the administrative law judge, we affirm the remainder of the award without supplementation.