Charles Hogue v. Chouteau Auto Mart

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 00-100526

Employee: Charles Hogue

Employer: Chouteau Auto Mart (Settled)

Insurer: Auto Owners Insurance Company (Settled)

Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated September 9, 2010. The award and decision of Chief Administrative Law Judge Paula A. McKeon, issued September 9, 2010, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $6^{\text {th }}$ day of May 2011.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

John J. Hickey, Member

Attest:

Employee: Charles Hogue

Injury No. 00-100526

Dependents: $\quad \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A}$

Employer: Chouteau Auto Mart

Insurer: Auto Owners Insurance Company

Additional Party: Missouri State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Hearing Date: August 11, 2010

Checked by: PAM/pd

1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes.
2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes.
4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: July 13, 2000
5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri
6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.
9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.
10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Yes.
11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Hogue developed plantar fasciitis of the left foot as a result of repetitive twisting and turning in the Course and scope of his employment as a car detailer.

1. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No. Date of death? N/A
2. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Left foot
3. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: Previously settled with Employer
4. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability? None
5. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? None
6. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? None
7. Employee's average weekly wages: N/A
8. Weekly compensation rate: $\ 266.67
9. Method wages computation: By agreement.

1. Amount of compensation payable: N/A
2. Second Injury Fund liability: Yes.

Permanent partial disability benefits of $\ 6,220.07

1. Future requirements awarded: N/A

Said payments to begin upon receipt of Award and to be payable and be subject to modification and review as provided by law.

The compensation awarded to the Claimant shall be subject to a lien in the amount of 25 percent of all payments hereunder in favor of the following attorney for necessary legal services rendered to the Claimant: Frank Eppright

Employee: Charles Hogue

Injury No. 00-100526

Dependents: $\quad \mathrm{N} / \mathrm{A}$

Employer: Chouteau Auto Mart

Insurer: Auto Owners Insurance Company

Additional Party: Missouri State Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Hearing Date: August 11, 2010

Checked by: PAM/pd

On August 11, 2010, the parties appeared for hearing. The Employee and Employer settled the claim for permanent partial disability prior to hearing. The Division had jurisdiction to hear this claim pursuant to Section 287.110. The Employee, Charles Hogue, appeared in person and with counsel Frank Eppright. The Second Injury Fund appeared by Assistant Attorney General Richard Wiles.

The parties stipulated to the following:

1) that Employer and Employee were operating under and subject to the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation law;

2) that Employer had notice of the claim and a timely claim for compensation was filed;

3) that the Employee's compensation rate is $\ 266.67; and

4) that no past temporary total disability or medical expenses were paid by Employer/Insurer.

The issues to be determined are:

1) whether Charles Hogue sustained an accident or occupational disease in the course and scope of his employment;

2) whether the conditions complained of are related to Hogue's primary claim; and

3) whether the Second Injury Fund has liability for permanent partial or permanent total disability benefits.

Charles "Mike" Hogue worked at Chouteau Auto Mart and Silver Eagle Auto Mart, car dealerships owned by the same person, as a car detailer for approximately 30 years.

Hogue cleaned both the interior and exterior of vehicles. He was required to climb in and out of cars frequently. Hogue testified that getting in and out of cars required him to twist his foot in awkward positions. Hogue had persistent left foot symptoms in 2000 but had onset of symptoms as early as 1995 .

Hogue was diagnosed with plantar fasciitis. Hogue was treated with cortisone shots and orthotic shoe inserts.

Hogue continued to work for Chouteau Auto Mart and Silver Eagle Auto Mart until he was terminated in July 2000.

Hogue has significant complaints of pain and burning in his left foot. Hogue has trouble walking long distances, standing and lifting due to his left foot symptoms.

Hogue has a psoriasis skin condition which predates his foot injury. Hogue testified his skin becomes irritated, unsightly and flaky.

In the 1970's, Hogue sustained a left hand injury with tendon and nerve involvement. The hand injury produces weakness, tingling and reduced grip strength in his left hand and forearm.

Hogue also suffers from diabetes, liver disease (cirrhosis) and Hepatitis C, which were diagnosed after his employment with Chouteau/Silver Eagle was terminated. Hogue also suffers from depression. Hogue suffered a tumultuous childhood with physical/mental abuse by his father. Hogue did poorly in school, dropping out in the ninth grade. Hogue does read but describes himself as slow and "retarded."

Hogue also testified to a history of alcohol and drug abuse; although, he is no longer using those substances. Hogue's sister, Vickie Vaughan, corroborated his abusive childhood and learning difficulties.

Following his termination at Chouteau/Silver Eagle, Hogue worked for approximately one year at Hide Away Lakes, his place of residence, as a security guard. Hogue quit the sitdown guard shack job due to fatigue and pain.

Hogue has had numerous medical evaluations. Dr. Prostic initially evaluated Hogue for foot injuries in 2001. Dr. Prostic assigned 8 percent permanent partial disability. Dr. Horton, specialist, evaluated Hogue for plantar fasciitis but determined it was not work-related. Dr. Hendler also testified that Hogue's plantar fasciitis was not work-related.

Dr. Koprivica evaluated Hogue on June 16, 2005. At that time, Dr. Koprivica did feel Hogue's work activities aggravated Hogue's underlying pes planus deformity and attributed 25

percent permanent partial disability to his left foot problems. Dr. Koprivica assigned 25 percent permanent partial disability to Hogue's left forearm referable to his complex laceration/repair. He further assigns 12.5 percent permanent partial disability for Hogue's psoriasis condition. Finally, Dr. Koprivica assesses 20 percent permanent partial disability to Hogue's chronic liver disease, cirrhosis, and Hepatitis C as predating the July 13, 2000 work injury, this despite the fact that the diseases were not diagnosed until after July 13, 2000. Dr. Koprivica deferred his opinion on any prior psychiatric injury to mental health professionals. In June 2005, Dr. Koprivica specifically felt that Hogue was not permanently and totally disabled until the subsequent complications of Hogue's liver disease were considered.

Dr. Koprivica did author several addendums to the original report, ultimately concluding that Hogue was permanently and totally disabled from the primary injury and prior disabilities.

Hogue was evaluated by mental health professionals as well. Dr. Schmidt, psychologist, evaluated Hogue on November 22, 2006. Schmidt assesses 45 percent permanent partial disability to psychological disability, 30 percent to pre-July 13, 2000 and 15 percent to depression associated with Hogue's left foot injury. Dr. Hughes, psychiatrist, does not attribute any disability to the primary claim nor makes an assessment of preexisting disability.

Michael Dreiling testified Hogue is unemployable in the open labor market. Dreiling acknowledges Hogue's emotional and psychological issues includes, among other things, significant drug and alcohol abuse as well as legal problems (felony conviction). Dreiling also testified that fatigue attributable to Hogue's liver disease impacts his employability.

Hogue claims he is permanently and totally disabled due to the primary claim and preexisting disability.

To determine whether an employee is deemed totally disabled under the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, it must be found that the Claimant unable to return to any employment. Section 287.020(7) RSMo (1986) defines total disability as "an inability to return to any employment and not merely...inability to return to the employment which the employee was engaged at the time of the accident." The terms "any employment" mean any reasonable or normal employment or occupation. Reese v. Gary \& Roger Link, Inc. 5 S.W.3d 522 (Mo. App. 1999); Fletcher v. Second Injury Fund, 922 S.W.2d 402 (Mo. App. 1996); Kowalski v. M-G Metal and Sales, Inc., 631 S.W.2d 919, 921 (Mo. App. 1982); Groce v. Pyle, 315 S.W.2d 482, 490 (Mo. App. 1958).

In applying the above to the current case, I find Hogue was not permanently and totally disabled as a result of the July 13, 2000 work injury.

The evidence clearly supports that Hogue is unable to work due to fatigue and depression associated with chronic liver disease and Hepatitis C. Dr. Koprivica's testimony that the liver disease and Hepatitis C were disabling prior to July 13, 2000 is simply not supported by the medical records and is not credible.

To qualify as a pre-existing condition, it need not be shown that the claimant or the employer knew of the pre-existing disability prior to the work injury. Messex, 989 S.W.2d at

Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Employee: Charles Hogue

Injury No. 00-100526

1. However, the claimant must establish that an actual or measurable disability existed at this time. Id. The disability must be "of such seriousness as to constitute a hindrance or obstacle to [her] employment." Loven v. Greene County, 63 S.W.3d 278, 283 (Mo. App. 2001). Preexisting conditions are not denominated "disabilities" as of the date of the second injury simply because, at some point in the future, they combine with that injury to render the claimant permanently and totally disabled. See Wilhite v. Hurd, 411 S.W.2d 72, 77-78 (Mo. 1967) (preexisting cataract as not sufficiently disabling at the time of workplace accident even though its natural progression thereafter cause a loss of vision.)

Of particular note is Dr. Prostic's January 26, 2001 repor