Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Elmer Harrison v. Thyssenkrupp Stahl Company

Decision date: July 19, 201114 pages

Summary

The Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to employee Elmer Leroy Harrison for a work-related injury sustained on February 21, 2007, while pushing a metal cart. The claimant was awarded permanent total disability benefits along with past temporary disability compensation and medical aid costs.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 07-063356

Employee: Elmer Leroy Harrison

Employer: Thyssenkrupp Stahl Company

Insurer: Self-Insured/Stahl Specialty Company

Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated October 13, 2010. The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Mark S. Siedlik, issued October 13, 2010, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad 19 9^{\text {th }}$ day of July 2011.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

William F. Ringer, Chairman

Alice A. Bartlett, Member

CONCURRING OPINION FILED

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Attest:

I write separately to disclose the fact that I did not participate in the June 15, 2011, oral argument in this matter. I have reviewed the evidence, read the briefs of the parties, and considered the whole record. I concur with the decision of the majority of the Commission.

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

AWARD

Employee: Elmer Leroy Harrison

Injury No. 07-063356

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Thyssenkrupp Stahl Company

Insurer: Self-insured

Additional Party: Missouri Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Hearing Date: August 19, 2010

Checked by: MSS/lh

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes.
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes.
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes.
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: February 21, 2007.
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Johnson County, Missouri.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes.
  7. Did employer receive proper notice? Yes.
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes.
  9. Was Claim for Compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes.
  10. Was employer insured by above insurer? Employer was self-insured.
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Claimant was pushing a metal cart out of a rut.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No. Date of death? N/A
  13. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Right foot, right ankle, knees and low back.
  14. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: Permanent total disability
  15. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 28,136.85

Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Employee: Elmer Leroy Harrison

  1. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by employer/insurer? $101,165.16
  1. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by employer/insurer? None.
  1. Employee's average weekly wages: 599.01.
  1. Weekly compensation rate: 399.36/$376.55.
  1. Method wages computation: By agreement.

**COMPENSATION PAYABLE**

  1. Amount of compensation payable: The following amounts are awarded as benefits to Claimant.

Permanent total disability benefits: The Employer shall pay future permanent total disability

payments at the rate of $399.36 per week, starting February 11, 2009, and to continue for the life of

the Claimant.

Medical treatment: Future medical treatment is left open.

  1. Second Injury Fund liability: None.

Said payments to begin as of the date of the award and to be payable and be subject to modification and

review as provided by law.

This Award is subject to a lien in favor of Thomas Stein, attorney at law, in the amount of 25% for legal

services rendered.

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Elmer Leroy Harrison

Injury No. 07-063356

Dependents: N/A

Employer: Thyssenkrupp Stahl Company

Insurer: Self-insured

Additional Party: Missouri Treasurer as Custodian of the Second Injury Fund

Hearing Date: August 19, 2010

Checked by: MSS/lh

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

At the hearing, the parties stipulated that: (1) Thyssenkrupp Stahl Company was an employer operating under the subject Missouri Workers' Compensation Law on February 21, 2007; (2) on February 21, 2007, an employer/employee relationship existed between Thyssenkrupp Stahl Company and Claimant; (3) the employer was self-insured under the law; (4) the employee filed a claim for compensation within the time prescribed by law; (5) notice was properly given; (6) the employee sustained an accident on February 21, 2007 that arose out of and in the course of his employment; and (7) the claimant's average weekly wage was $\ 599.01 and the applicable compensation rate is $\$ 399.36 / \ 376.55.

The issues to be decided are as follows:

(1) The nature and extent of permanent disability and the liability of the Employer for same;

(2) The liability of the Second Injury Fund;

(3) Future medical treatment.

Claimant testified on his behalf. He also offered the following exhibits, all of which were admitted into evidence:

C Annual Employee's Performance \& Compliance Review

D Medical records-Central Family Medicine

E Medical records-Western Missouri Bone \& Joint Clinic

F Medical records-Saul Trevino, M.D.

G Medical records-Stanley Bowling, M.D.

H Medical records-Columbia Regional Hospital

I Medical records-Greg Horton, M.D.

J Deposition—James Stuckmeyer, M.D.

K Deposition—Allan Schmidt, Ph.D.

L Deposition—Mary Titterington (2009)

M Deposition—Mary Titterington (2010)

O Photographs of Claimant's feet and right ankle

The Employer offered the following exhibits, all of which were admitted into evidence:

1 Deposition—Claimant

2 Deposition—Eden Wheeler, M.D.

3 Deposition—Greg Horton, M.D.

4 Deposition—Terry Cordray

The Fund offered no witnesses or exhibits.

Claimant testified that he was born on August 5, 1960 and is 50 years old. He attended Warrensburg High School and dropped out after the $9^{\text {th }}$ grade. He struggled in school and got poor grades. He never obtained his GED.

In 1978, Claimant went to work for the Employer as a buffer. He continued to work there until 2009. When his accident occurred on February 21, 2007, he was a cell leader. On that date, he was pushing a heavy mold cart when the cart got stuck in a crack. He squatted and then lifted and pushed the cart to get it out. In the process of doing this, he heard a pop in his right ankle.

He reported the injury to his supervisor and eventually filled out an accident report. He got treatment on his own until the Employer began authorizing medical treatment. He saw his family physician, Dr. Dyer, who referred him to an orthopedic surgeon, Gregory Bliss, M.D.. Dr. Bliss referred him to another orthopedic surgeon, Saul Trevino, M.D.. Dr. Trevino performed surgery on his ankle in September, 2007. During Claimant's treatment with Dr. Trevino, the Employer began authorizing treatment for the injury.

The Employer then referred Claimant to Gregory Horton, M.D. at K.U. Medical Center for further treatment. Dr. Horton treated Claimant until February, 2009. Dr. Horton performed surgery on Claimant in August, 2008.

Claimant testified that he has the following medical problems from the accident:

  1. Constant swelling in the right foot, which worsens as the day progresses. If there is significant swelling, his skin will split.
  2. Constant aching in the right foot.
  3. Constant popping in his right ankle and knee.
  4. Difficulty sleeping.
  5. Frequent knee pain.
  1. Frequent back pain.
  2. Constant feeling of being tired.
  3. Depression

Because of the pain in his right ankle and back, he cannot be on his feet for more than an hour. He then has to elevate his leg. He will elevate his leg four or five times a day. He typically rests his leg for an hour each time.

It is difficult for him to get a decent night's sleep. Because of that, he takes naps during the day.

He testified that he feels depressed because he is not able to financially provide for his family as he did before his injury.

Claimant testified that he worked light duty in early 2009 before being laid off. He sat down and inspected parts. He was laid off in January or February, 2009. After that, he applied for Social Security disability benefits. He was approved for those and is currently receiving them. He does not feel capable of working anywhere.

At the request of the Employer, Claimant saw Terry Cordray, vocational expert. Claimant's attorney informed Claimant that Mr. Cordray initially believed that he was capable of performing some jobs in the Warrensburg area. That included a cashier's job at a convenience store like Casey's. Claimant applied for those jobs and received no job offers.

Employer's Exhibit 1 was Claimant's deposition. In that deposition, Claimant testified that he normally wears a size $101 / 2$ shoe. Because of the constant swelling in his right foot and ankle, he has to wear a size $131 / 2$. (p. 58). He puts inserts in his left shoe to compensate. (p. 58). He also testified that his right foot swells every day. (p. 59). The swelling goes down when he sleeps. (p. 60). To relieve the swelling, he elevates his foot. (p. 60).

He also testified in his deposition that he can drive a car, but does not drive for long distances. (p. 91). He only drives in or near his home in Warrensburg. (p. 92).

He also testified in his deposition that he did light duty work for the Employer until early 2009. (p. 65). He sat down and inspected parts. (p. 65). This was just a temporary, light duty job that the Employer created for him. (p. 66). It was a made up job for him. (p. 67).

James Stuckmeyer, M.D. testified by deposition. His deposition was marked Claimant's Exhibit J. Dr. Stuckmeyer is a board certified orthopedic surgeon. (p. 48). He evaluated Claimant on March 19, 2009. (p. 50). The medical records he reviewed indicate that the work accident caused a possible navicular fracture and a posterior tibial tendon rupture in Claimant's right foot. (p. 52). On September 6, 2007, Claimant underwent his first surgery for his ankle.

(p. 52). On August 21, 2008, he underwent a second surgery. At that time, Dr. Horton performed a triple arthrodesis on his right foot and ankle. (p. 54).

Dr. Stuckmeyer reviewed the treatment records of Dr. Horton. Those records were marked Claimant's Exhibit I. The last office visit with Dr. Horton was on February 10, 2009. (Exhibit I, p. 2). At that time, Claimant had a loud popping in his ankle when he stepped down. (p. 2). Claimant also complained of swelling in his ankle. (p. 2). Dr. Horton commented that Claimant's foot and ankle would never be the same, that he had some substantial limitations and that he should resume activities as tolerated. (p. 2). Dr. Horton felt that Claimant would need long-term management of the swelling. (p. 2). This long-term management would include a brace and a doctor to manage his pain medication needs in the long term. (p. 2).

Claimant told Dr. Stuckmeyer that he had significant pain in his right foot and ankle. (p. 55). He had difficulty with prolonged standing, walking and traversing steps. (p. 55). He has difficulty walking on uneven surfaces. (p. 55). He has significant swelling in his right foot and ankle, which requires him to frequently elevate his leg. (p. 55). He has difficulty with shoe wear. (p. 55).

Claimant also to

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award allowing workers' compensation benefits for Jason L. Collins' occupational disease claim involving cumulative trauma to his back and right lower extremity sustained while employed as a truck driver/laborer. The Commission rejected the employer's argument that an untimely answer resulted in admission of all facts including legal conclusions about whether the injury arose out of employment.

occupational disease9,505 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of death benefits to the widow of Russell Hayes, a volunteer firefighter killed in the line of duty. The majority awarded death benefits at the statutory minimum wage rate of $40.00 per week, though a dissenting opinion argued for a higher wage determination based on the statutory provisions for calculating average weekly earnings.

occupational disease5,849 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award of workers' compensation benefits to Elizabeth A. Steele for injuries sustained when a patient slammed his leg down on her head, neck, and shoulders while she was working as a critical care unit nurse. The Commission found the award was supported by competent and substantial evidence and determined the employee is entitled to permanent and total disability benefits.

occupational disease10,794 words
affirmed

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the administrative law judge's award denying compensation to Carl Hanes for an alleged occupational disease from radiation exposure at the Department of Corrections. The Commission found the employee failed to provide proper notice and that the injury did not arise out of and in the course of employment, resulting in no benefits awarded.

occupational disease6,305 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's Temporary or Partial Award in a workers' compensation case for employee Cynthia Porter, finding the award supported by competent and substantial evidence. The Commission upheld the ALJ's determination that the claimant's diabetes was well-controlled, rejecting the employer/insurer's challenge to this medical finding.

occupational disease7,008 words