(Affirming Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)
Injury No.: 04-009996
Employee: Odessa Current
Employer: Little Hills Health Care, LLC (Settled)
Insurer: Travelers Commercial Casualty Company (Settled)
Additional Party: Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund
The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by section 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to section 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the award and decision of the administrative law judge dated February 9, 2011. The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Edwin J. Kohner, issued February 9, 2011, is attached and incorporated by this reference.
The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.
Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $26^{\text {th }}$ day of July 2011.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
Alice A. Bartlett, Member
DISSENTING OPINION FILED
Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member
Attest:
I have reviewed and considered all of the competent and substantial evidence on the whole record. Based on my review of the evidence as well as my consideration of the relevant provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, I believe the decision of the administrative law judge (ALJ) should be modified and employee should be awarded permanent total disability benefits against the Second Injury Fund.
First, there is no dispute that employee suffered an accident that arose out of and in the course of her employment on February 6, 2004, and that the injuries resulting from said accident combined with employee's preexisting disabilities to trigger Second Injury Fund liability. The issue is whether the combination of employee's primary injury and preexisting disabilities resulted in employee's permanent and total disability, irrespective of any alleged post-accident worsening of her preexisting condition.
The ALJ found that employee is permanently and totally disabled, but not solely due to the combination of her primary injury with her preexisting disabilities. Instead, the ALJ found that employee's total disability resulted from the combination of her primary injury, her preexisting disabilities, and the degeneration of her cervical spine months after the work-related accident. Therefore, the ALJ only awarded enhanced permanent partial disability benefits against the Second Injury Fund and denied employee's claim for permanent total disability benefits. I find that the competent and substantial evidence establishes that the combination of employee's primary injury and preexisting disabilities, alone, caused employee's permanent total disability.
Although employee did suffer from a preexisting cervical condition, there was no competent and substantial evidence presented at the hearing, nor in the transcript and medical records, to suggest that any post-accident worsening of this preexisting condition contributed to employee's permanent total disability.
The ALJ largely bases his award on a finding that employee's cervical disc herniation was caused by the post-accident worsening of employee's preexisting degenerative cervical condition. However, Dr. Volarich credibly opined that the primary injury was the substantial factor as well as the prevailing or primary factor causing the disc herniation at C4-5 as well as the aggravation of degenerative disc disease and degenerative joint disease at C4-5, C5-6, C6-7, all of which required extensive repair in the form of a 3-level anterior cervical discectomy with fusion and instrumentation. Dr. Volarich noted that employee's "symptoms changed dramatically after she fell on the steps February 6, 2004 and what was found on the subsequent imaging studies correlate with the kind of problem she had from that fall and after the fall." Dr. Volarich ultimately opined that employee is permanently and totally disabled as a direct result of the primary injury in combination with her preexisting conditions.
The ALJ relied on Dr. Rutz' opinion that employee's herniated disc was the natural progression of her preexisting condition. However, the ALJ's reliance on the opinion of Dr. Rutz is misplaced in that Dr. Rutz only had 75 pages of medical records concerning employee, where her total medical records number in the hundreds of pages. Dr. Rutz
-2 -
did not have the benefit of a full copy of Dr. Kantor's records, a full copy of the Barnes Jewish-St. Peters emergency room record from the day of the incident, the Health South records, or employee's June 2004 MRI report, which is significant in that it clearly evidences complaints related to employee's left upper extremity. Because Dr. Rutz lacked the aforementioned medical records, he was under the impression that employee's complaints had significantly changed when she came to see him. If he had reviewed all of the medical records he would have known that this was not the case. Dr. Rutz' opinions are based on a mere portion of the medical records chronicling the treatment employee received for the primary injury and, therefore, it cannot be said that his medical causation opinions are more credible than those of Dr. Volarich, who reviewed all of employee's medical records.
I find that the ALJ's reliance on Dr. Rutz' opinions is misplaced and that employee's permanent total disability is the result of his primary injury combining with his preexisting disabilities, irrespective of any post-accident worsening of any alleged preexisting degenerative condition. As such, I would modify the award of the administrative law judge merely awarding employee permanent partial disability benefits and award employee permanent total disability benefits against the Second Injury Fund.
For the foregoing reasons, I respectfully dissent from the decision of the majority of the Commission.
Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member