A legal file was established for this hearing, which consisted of the following documents, to wit:
- Report of Injury
- Claim for Compensation, filed with the Division February 10, 2010
- Answer of the Second Injury Fund, filed with the Division February 22, 2010
- Stipulation for Compromise Settlement, approved by the Division April 6, 2011
- Request for Final Hearing, filed with the Division May 13, 2011
Paula S. Neff, claimant herein, testified in her own behalf. Claimant testified that she is not married and has no children. Claimant is 50 years of age at the date of hearing. Claimant has been employed by the Employer for eight years prior to the hearing and currently works in the maintenance department, being classified as a Maintenance II worker. Her job duties include helping any department when needed with painting, construction, maintaining the physical structures of the Employer. Claimant stated that her job task often includes climbing ladders and almost never involves being seated to perform a job task. At the date of hearing, Claimant was assigned to the electrical department of the Employer.
Claimant testified that prior to 2009, she was assigned to the paint and carpentry shop and that she was working in paint and carpentry at the time of her primary injury. Claimant testified that prior to her December 28, 2009, accident, she had no other work-related injuries.
Claimant testified that on December 28, 2009, while helping a carpenter install a shelf, she was holding a board when she felt an immediate pain in her left shoulder. Claimant reported the incident and was sent to the emergency room where an x-ray was taken and Claimant was given a prescription for pain. Claimant was referred to Dr. Runde for follow-up. Dr. Runde ordered an MRI after which Claimant was referred to an orthopedic surgeon for treatment of a torn rotator cuff.
Claimant testified that she received surgery to repair her left rotator cuff tear from Dr. Carter who released Claimant without restrictions about six months after the surgery.
Claimant testified that she currently has symptoms which include difficulty in extending her arm, pain when reaching above her head, and pain when making side movements with her left arm. Claimant also stated that she favors her left arm use and accommodates by using her right hand and arm for heavier tasks. She also indicated that reaching up to change light bulbs in ceiling fixtures of secure areas is very difficult and painful because she has to stretch her arm and shoulder to reach the fixtures. Claimant testified that she had no injury to her left shoulder prior to December 28, 2009.
Claimant testified that when she was a teenager she fell from the back of a moving truck, which caused bilateral ankle fractures. Claimant received surgery to install hardware in each ankle. The hardware was later removed. Claimant also injured her back in the same accident. Claimant stated that she wore a back brace for two and one-half years as a result of the injury to her back from the truck accident. As a result of her injuries from this accident Claimant cannot wear high-heeled shoes. When the weather is cold or wet her ankles ache and sometimes her ankles are somewhat unstable when Claimant walks on uneven ground.
Claimant testified that in 1998 she fell from a horse which resulted in the right heel fracture which was surgically repaired. Claimant stated that her leg was elevated for six months following this accident. Claimant testified that as a result of this injury she has lost some feeling in her right heel and foot. In addition, Claimant stated that her right foot feels tingly from time to time.
Claimant testified that she is accommodated to some extent at her work and that since she has moved to the electric department she does not have to carry heavy items as often as when she worked with the paint and carpentry department.
On cross-examination, Claimant admitted that she assisted in building her home and that she can drive for short distances without problem, but driving long distances becomes difficult and painful because of pain in her ankles. Claimant admitted that she maintains her own property.
Claimant admitted that Dr. Carter released her from treatment for her shoulder without permanent restrictions. She further admitted that she does not take prescription pain medication because of her shoulder pain, but that she does take Aleve from time to time for shoulder pain.
Dr. Cohen performed an independent medical evaluation on the Claimant and issued a report of his findings dated March 17, 2011. Dr. Cohen's report indicates that he took a history from the Claimant, reviewed certain medical records which were identified in the report, and conducted an examination of the Claimant. Dr. Cohen opined that Claimant suffered from left shoulder trauma secondary to a glenoid labral tear, glenoid and humeral chondromalacia, rotator cuff tears, and impingement as result of the primary injury of December 28, 2009.
Dr. Cohen also diagnosed Claimant's pre-existing conditions as status post two ankle surgeries for multiple fractures and status post multiple calcaneal fractures with hardware.
Dr. Cohen opined that he concurred with the disability set out in the settlement of the primary claim at 22.5 % of the left shoulder. Dr. Cohen rated Claimant's pre-existing conditions at 35 % of the left ankle and 45 % of the right ankle. He further opined that the disability from the primary injury combined with the disabilities from the pre-existing conditions create a greater overall disability than the simple sum. Dr. Cohen recommended a multiplicity factor of 15 % should be added to the simple sum of the injuries and conditions. Dr. Cohen further opined that Claimant's pre-existing conditions were industrially disabling.