| FINAL AWARD DENYING COMPENSATION (After Mandate from the Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District of Missouri) |
| Employee: | Michael Hutson |
| Employer: | Ultimate Electronics, Inc. (Settled) |
| Insurer: | Liberty Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Settled) |
| Additional Party: | Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of Second Injury Fund |
| The Missouri Court of Appeals for the Eastern District issued an opinion reversing the August 18, 2011, award and decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission). ${ }^{1}$ Hutson v. Treasurer, ED97321, (Mo. App. E.D. 2012) (April 17, 2012). By mandate dated May 10, 2012 the Court remanded this matter to the Commission for further proceedings consistent with the Court's opinion. |
| Pursuant to the Court's mandate, we issue this award. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, we affirm the award of the administrative law judge denying compensation. The award and decision of Administrative Law Judge John K. Ottenad, dated January 21, 2011, is attached and incorporated to the extent it is not inconsistent with our findings, conclusions, decision, and award. |
| The Court has concluded that we are without power to require employee to show evidence of the synergistic combination of his disabilities because the Second Injury Fund agreed "not to contest the synergistic combination of the injuries in this case." |
| By its opinion, the Court directed us to make a finding as to the degree of employee's preexisting shoulder disability. In accordance with the Court's direction, we find that at the time employee suffered his 2003 work injury, employee had a 5% permanent partial disability of his right shoulder. We rely on the following findings in reaching our conclusion. |
| The record contains two medical reports regarding employee's physical conditions; the report of Dr. Cohen dated November 27, 1991 (19 years before trial), and the report of Dr. Volarich dated October 27, 2004 (6 years before trial). |
| At the time of his report, Dr. Cohen opined that employee suffered from a 25% permanent partial disability of his right shoulder as a result of bursitis and osteoarthritis. Dr. Cohen believed the bursitis and osteoarthritis were, in turn, the result of an overuse syndrome employee developed while performing his duties for Vess, his employer in 1991. |
[^0] [^0]: ${ }^{1}$ In reaching its conclusion, the Court also considered our August 26, 2011, Order denying employee's Motion for Reconsideration of the award.
At the time of his report, Dr. Volarich discussed employee's pre-existing medical conditions. Dr. Volarich stated, "It is my opinion that the following permanent industrial disabilities exist and are a hindrance to his employment or reemployment: There is a 7.5 % permanent partial disability of the body as a whole rated at the lumbrosacral spine due to his mild lumbar strain syndrome. This rating accounts for some intermittent low back discomfort leading up to 4/18/03." There is no mention that employee had any shoulder complaints at the time Dr. Volarich examined employee, with the exception of complaints employee attributed to his cervical condition. Under the heading of his report entitled Upper Extremity and Joint Exam, Dr. Volarich recorded, "[t]he upper extremity examination is deferred."
Dr. Volarich recited that employee reported his job duties as follows:
[H]e delivered TV's, entertainment centers, and furniture which included heavy lifting, bending, twisting, reaching, pulling, pushing, carrying heavy TV's and heavy furniture in his hands, carrying big heavy items that were clumsy or difficult to hold, twisting, turning. He was unloading and loading the truck. He stated that he crawled behind entertainment centers while hooking up equipment and setting up the entertainment centers. He did bending, kneeling, crawling, reaching, stretching, turning, twisting, pushing, pulling, and gripping. He stated that he also dealt with climbing up steps, driveways, walking on uneven surfaces and cracked surfaces while holding very heavy items, walking on loose gravel, walking distances from the truck to the point of delivery, dealing with driving in bad weather conditions.
Mr. Hutson described that he worked with his hands and arms constantly. He was either loading or unloading the truck, driving the truck, or loading and unloading at the homes delivering furniture, setting up furniture, moving furniture. He reported that his job required him to be in all types of abnormal positions and awkward positions such as bending, kneeling, crawling, reaching, stretching, turning, twisting, pushing, pulling, going up stairs, reaching and bending over furniture.
Mr. Hutson's job required him to lift heavy objects constantly. He lifted large TV's and furniture. He stated that the maximum he would lift at one time would be approximately 200 pounds. Mr. Hutson stated that they averaged putting together and delivering three to five entertainment racks daily and his job again, included delivery, set up, and working in the warehouse.
Employee testified that before the 2003 work injury he missed work due to his shoulder condition and that he was not able to do overhead work.
Employee testified that he told Dr. Volarich "everything" about the physical problems he had performing his job.
Dr. Volarich's report was prepared almost six years before trial and did not mention or rate a pre-existing shoulder condition. Considering Dr. Volarich's detailed description of employee's arm-intensive work activities, we find it beyond belief that Dr. Volarich simply overlooked or forgot to notate employee's mention that his right shoulder condition was such that employee was unable to perform any activities over his head. If that were the case, we would expect to see some indication in the record that employee or his counsel brought this alleged significant omission to the attention of Dr. Volarich, so he could include the shoulder condition in his opinions.
We think the reason Dr. Volarich's report includes no mention of an alleged right shoulder condition is obvious. We do not believe employee told Dr. Volarich that his shoulder condition caused him problems with performing his work activities. And the absence of such a report to Dr. Volarich leads us to conclude that, at the time Dr. Volarich examined employee, employee's right shoulder was not causing him significant difficulty in the work place.
We believe employee's proven ability to perform arm-intensive activities beyond the restrictions of Dr. Cohen shows that Dr. Cohen's 20 year-old opinion regarding the extent of employee's shoulder disability was not borne out by reality.
Considering the evidence summarized above, we believe that at the time employee suffered the 2003 work injury, employee had a 5\% permanent partial disability at the level of the right shoulder ( 11.6 weeks). Employee also had a 7.5 % permanent partial disability of the body as a whole referable to the low back ( 30 weeks). Employee's preexisting permanent partial disabilities total 41.6 weeks and do not meet the threshold to trigger Second Injury Fund liability. See § 287.220.1 RSMo. Employee has not proven he is entitled to permanent partial disability from the Second Injury Fund.
For the foregoing reasons, we affirm the administrative law judge's denial of compensation in this matter.
Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $15^{\text {th }}$ day of June 2012.
LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION
William F. Ringer, Chairman
James Avery, Member
Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member
Attest:
STATE OF MISSOURI
DEPARTMENT OF LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS
DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
3315 WEST TRUMAN BLVD, P.O. BOX 58, JEFFERSON CITY, MO 65102 (573) 751-4231
JANUARY 21, 2011
03-042139
Scan Copy
Injury Date : 04-18-2003
Insurance No. : 442554535
*Employed : MICHAEL HATSON
18928725 8 4473 E SWALLEN RD
IMPERIAL, MO 63052
*Anst. Ally General: ATTY GENERAL CHRIS KOSTER
18928724 1 815 OLIVE ST STE 200
PO BOX 861
ST LOUIS, MO 63188
*Employed: ALLOHOUY EVAN J BEATTY
2025 S BRESTRONG BLVD
SUITE 20
ST LOUIS, MO 63144
Enclosed is a copy of the Award on Hearing made in the above case.
Under the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, an Application for Review of the decision of the Administrative Law Judge may be made to the Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission within twenty (20) calendar days of the date of the award. If you wish to request a review by the Commission, application may be made by completing an Application for Review Form (MOIC-2567). The Application for Review should be sent directly to the Commission at the following address.
Labor and Industrial Relations Commission
PO Box 599
Jefferson City, MO 65102-0599
If an Application for Review (MOIC-2567) is not postmarked or received within twenty (20) calendar days of the date of the award, the enclosed award becomes final and no appeal may be made to the Commission or to the courts.
Please reference the above Injury Number in any correspondence with the Division or Commission.
DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Please visit our website at www.labor.mo.gov/wc
W1-142(07-09)
AWARD ON BEARING
NLP
Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION