Skip to content
Ott Law Firm

Terry O'Connor v. Construction Material Trucking, Inc.

Decision date: July 3, 201212 pages

Summary

The Missouri LIRC affirmed the administrative law judge's award granting workers' compensation to Terry L. O'Connor for a left shoulder injury sustained on January 24, 2006, when a parked truck overturned 90 degrees into an excavation. The employee was awarded $6,352.39 in compensation for 7.5% permanent disability to the left shoulder at the 232-week level, plus necessary medical aid of $17,180.

Archive Notice

This archive contains published Missouri Labor and Industrial Relations Commission workers' compensation decisions reproduced for research convenience. Official source links remain authoritative where provided. Joseph Ott, Attorney 67889, Ott Law Firm - Constant Victory - Personal Injury and Litigation maintains these public legal archives to support Missouri case research and to help prospective clients connect that research to the firm's courtroom practice.

Related Legal Help

Practical guidance for this decision

Third-Party Injury Check

This workers' comp decision may point to a separate injury claim.

  • A driver, contractor, property owner, or equipment company may share fault.
  • The injury involved a vehicle, unsafe premises, defective equipment, or a non-employer vendor.
  • A serious injury or death may need both benefits review and civil-claim analysis.

Caption

FINAL AWARD ALLOWING COMPENSATION

(Affirming Amended Award and Decision of Administrative Law Judge)

Injury No.: 06-129477

Employee: Terry L. O'Connor

Employer: Construction Material Trucking, Inc.

Insurer: Ace Property \& Casualty Company

The above-entitled workers' compensation case is submitted to the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (Commission) for review as provided by § 287.480 RSMo. Having reviewed the evidence and considered the whole record, the Commission finds that the award of the administrative law judge is supported by competent and substantial evidence and was made in accordance with the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law. Pursuant to § 286.090 RSMo, the Commission affirms the amended award and decision of the administrative law judge dated December 23, 2011. The amended award and decision of Administrative Law Judge Mark Siedlik, issued December 23, 2011, is attached and incorporated by this reference.

The Commission further approves and affirms the administrative law judge's allowance of attorney's fee herein as being fair and reasonable.

Any past due compensation shall bear interest as provided by law.

Given at Jefferson City, State of Missouri, this $\qquad$ day of July 2012.

LABOR AND INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS COMMISSION

V A C A N T

Chairman

James Avery, Member

Curtis E. Chick, Jr., Member

Attest:

FINAL AWARD

Employee: Terry L. O'Connor

Injury No: 06-129477

Employer: Construction Material Trucking, Inc.

Insurer: Ace Property \& Casualty Company

Hearing Date: August 25, 2011

Checked By: MSS/cy

FINDINGS OF FACT AND RULINGS OF LAW

  1. Are any benefits awarded herein? Yes
  2. Was the injury or occupational disease compensable under Chapter 287? Yes
  3. Was there an accident or incident of occupational disease under the Law? Yes
  4. Date of accident or onset of occupational disease: January 24, 2006
  5. State location where accident occurred or occupational disease was contracted: Jackson County, Missouri.
  6. Was above employee in employ of above Employer at time of alleged accident or occupational disease? Yes
  7. Did Employer receive proper notice of accident? Yes
  8. Did accident or occupational disease arise out of and in the course of the employment? Yes
  9. Was claim for compensation filed within time required by Law? Yes
  10. Was Employer insured by above Insurer? Yes.
  11. Describe work employee was doing and how accident occurred or occupational disease contracted: Employee was sitting in parked truck that overturned 90 degrees into excavation.
  12. Did accident or occupational disease cause death? No.

Date of death? N/A.

  1. Part(s) of body injured by accident or occupational disease: Left upper arm

Issued by DIVISION OF WORKERS' COMPENSATION

Employee: Terry L. O'Connor

  1. Nature and extent of any permanent disability: 7.5 % left shoulder at the 232 week level.
  2. Compensation paid to-date for temporary disability: $\ 0 (zero).
  3. Value necessary medical aid paid to date by Employer/Insurer? \$197.00
  4. Value necessary medical aid not furnished by Employer/Insurer? \17,180
  5. Employee's average weekly wages: \ 592.00 (by agreement).
  6. Weekly compensation rate: $\$ 394.67 / \ 365.08
  7. Method wages computation: By agreement.

COMPENSATION PAYABLE

  1. Amount of compensation payable: $\ 6,352.39
  2. Second Injury Fund liability: N/A.
  3. Future requirements awarded: None.

FINDINGS OF FACT and RULINGS OF LAW:

Employee: Terry L. O'Connor

Injury No: 06-129477

Employer: Construction Material Trucking, Inc.

Insurer: Ace Property \& Casualty Company

Hearing Date: August 25, 2011

Checked By: MSS/cy

This hearing occurred on August 25, 2011, with Claimant appearing in person and with counsel, Brianne Niemann of Boyd \& Kenter, and Employer/Insurer represented by Thomas D. Billam of Wallace, Saunders, Austin, Brown \& Enochs, with Employer owners Earl Guest and Wayne Taylor.

It was then stipulated by the parties that: 1) on or about January 24, 2006, Construction Material Trucking, Inc., was an employer operating under the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law, and that its liability under said Law was fully insured by Ace Property \& Casualty Company; 2) that on or about January 24, 2006, Terry O'Connor was an employee of Construction Material Trucking, Inc., and was working under the provisions of the Missouri Workers' Compensation Law; 3) that Terry O'Connor's average weekly wage was $\ 592.00, resulting in a weekly temporary total disability compensation rate of $\ 394.67 and the maximum permanent partial disability weekly benefit of $\ 365.08; 4) that a formal written Claim for Compensation was filed within the time prescribed by law; 5) that medical aid had been furnished by the Employer/Insurer in the amount of $\ 197.00 ; 6 ) that no temporary total disability payments have been made by Employer/Insurer.

The parties have stated that the issues are injury, medical causation of any injury, past due medical, future medical care, past-incurred permanent total disability but no issue of temporary total disability. The parties had a slight disagreement as to average weekly wage but stipulated to $\ 592, resulting in a weekly benefit rate of $\ 394.67 / $\ 365.08. The parties agreed that the only medical benefits provided were $\ 197 paid by Employer for Dr. Steelman's care on the date of the accident, January 24, 2006.

ISSUES

The only issue to be determined by this hearing was: 1) whether Claimant suffered any permanent injury arising from an accident January 24, 2006.

A. Exhibits

Claimant's evidence involved his own oral testimony, two Submissions of reports of Dr. James A. Stuckmeyer (Exhibits D and E), a deposition of vocational expert Terry Cordray (Exhibit I). Claimant also offered various Exhibits: a copy of the formal Claim (Exhibit A), medical records of Claimant (Exhibit G), deposition of Dr. Jeffrey T. MacMillan (Exhibit L), two Awards (Exhibit J and K), and medical bills (Exhibit H). Exhibits were marked as B and C, but were withdrawn by Claimant's attorney.

Employer/Insurer's evidence involved oral testimony of Earl Guest and Wayne Taylor, a Submission of Dr. MacMillan's report of November 28, 2007 (Exhibit 1), two pages of medical records of Dr. Steelman of January 24, 2006 (Exhibit 2, later withdrawn by Employer/Insurer as contained within the Exhibit 1), cross-examination of Dr. MacMillan (Exhibit 3, later withdrawn by Employer/Insurer's counsel in light of Claimant's offering the entirety of the deposition, as Exhibit L), driver log showing Claimant's driving hours in 2006 (Exhibit 4), and objection to Dr. Stuckmeyer's first Submission (Exhibit 5).

Employer/Insurer had raised objection to Dr. Stuckmeyer's first Submission (see Exhibit 5), which this Court renders moot pursuant to the second Stuckmeyer Submission (Claimant's Exhibit E). Employer/Insurer had objected to the deposition of Terry Cordray (Exhibit I) because there had been no showing that the witness was unavailable for trial and because the deposition had not been "read and signed" - as requested by the witness himself. Both of these objections were overruled and Claimant's counsel was instructed to provide the signature page for the deposition signed by Mr. Cordray without delay, both to this Court and to Employer/Insurer counsel. That signature page has been provided and Employer's Exhibit I is admitted. Employer/Insurer objected to the relevancy of Claimant's Exhibits J and K (unrelated Awards attempted to be used in questioning of Dr. MacMillan in Exhibit L). The Court took "judicial notice" of the certified copies of the Awards of other claimants, but this Court does not find any relevance or any precedential value of any comments or opinions therein, by other Administrative Law Judges. Employer/Insurer also objected as hearsay to the inclusion of any medical opinions about medical causation that may exist in the voluminous treatment records (Exhibit G). No depositions were taken of any such medical providers, none of these providers testified live, and no "submissions" were made under R.S.Mo. § 287.210. This Court noted the objections and withheld immediate ruling.

This Court has reviewed the extensive medical records by the Pennsylvania physicians. This Court finds it unnecessary to rule on objections to Employer's Exhibit 9 because no such medical causation opinions were located within these treatment records.

B. Testimony

The oral testimony of Claimant delved into his background, education, prior jobs, and his driving job with Construction Material Trucking. Claimant recited he had passed his D.O.T. physical exam every two years, with the latest occurring in September/October of 2005. Claimant considered himself a "good employee," an evaluation that his employers later verified in their testimony.

Claimant testified about his parked truck sliding into an excavation. He had been sitting sideways in the parked truck, talking out the driver's window to another worker. Claimant then described the mechanism of injury and body parts struck when the truck slid into the ditch.

Claimant stated his employer took him to an occupational clinic the same day, and agreed that his only complaint the day of the accident was to his left arm/shoulder. Claimant was treated and released with no restrictions. Claimant stated he had returned to work the very next day, asserting to his employer that he could drive even though his shoulder was stiff and sore.

Claimant asserted he complained to Wayne Taylor either the day of the accident, or the next day about his neck being stiff, an assertion categorically denied by Mr. Taylor during his testimony. Claimant also asserted he complained about his neck roughly a week later, again to Mr. Taylor, which Mr. Taylor also denied. The Court finds the testimony of Mr. Taylor in this area more credible than the testimony of Claimant.

Claimant admitted he had never thereafter made any complaints to any of his employers about any injury allegedly caused by the accident in January 2006. Claimant continued to drive for the employer, driving every scheduled day throughout the rest of 2006 (see Employer's Exhibit 4) until he quit his job a day or two before Christmas 2006.

Claimant testified he had planned to move to Pennsylvania once his child support payments had ended in December 2006 because his father had a house he could use rent-free. Claimant and his friends packed a U-Haul truck the day after he quit and claimant himself drove to Pennsylvania over the next two days - involving 18 hours of driving, arriving on Christmas day. Claimant admitted that when Earl Guest called him while they were packing to inquire why the claimant had quit, Claimant offered no mention of accident, injury or neck complaints.

The balance of Claimant's testimony dealt with medical care he had received through the State of Pennsylvania, a program called Access Plus, that Claimant said provided free medical care. Claimant testified he had received no medical bills during all his medical care in Pennsylvania.

Claimant asserted he had told Wayne Taylor the next morning that he was stiff and tight and that Wayne told him he would get better. Claimant alleged he again complained to Mr. Taylor about a week later about being stiff and that he probably mentioned his neck.

Mr. Taylor denied any such neck complaints were made to him the day after the accident or a week later, and specifically denied any neck complaints were made to him, ever. In fact, Mr. Taylor said he himself approached Claimant roughly a week after the accident to inquire into Claimant's health, and Claimant simply lifted his left arm to shoulder level, said it was a little stiff, but that he would be okay. This same gesture - lifting of the arm to shoulder level - was how Claimant had communicated his arm stiffness on the day after the accident, in proclaiming his ability to drive - according to Mr. Taylor. Mr. Taylor was much more credible in his detail of these two "conversations" to the effect that Claimant had made no mention of his neck, no complaints a

Full decision text continues in the plain-text archive copy.

Related Decisions

Obermann v. BRM LLC(2022)

September 13, 2022#17-088357

reversed

The Commission reversed the ALJ's award of permanent total disability (PTD) benefits from the Second Injury Fund, finding that while the employee sustained a 22.5% permanent partial disability of the right shoulder from the November 3, 2017 work injury, the PTD resulted from a combination of the primary injury and multiple preexisting disabilities including prior knee and ankle injuries. The Court denied SIF liability for PTD benefits because the employee's PTD was not solely attributable to the primary injury combined with preexisting disabilities exclusive of a compensable 1995 left knee injury.

shoulder11,910 words
affirmed

The LIRC affirmed the administrative law judge's award in a medical fee dispute where Timberlake Surgery Center sought additional reimbursement for authorized left shoulder rotator cuff surgery performed on employee James Noel. The court found the HCP's charges fair and reasonable, and entitled to payment, while denying pre-judgment interest and attorney's fees.

shoulder8,438 words
reversed

The Commission reversed the administrative law judge's award finding that an employee suffered a work-related right shoulder injury on April 27, 2018, when she struck her shoulder on a metal dye plate. The Commission determined that the employee was not entitled to workers' compensation benefits or additional medical care for the alleged injury.

shoulder6,891 words
affirmed

The Missouri LIRC affirmed the administrative law judge's denial of workers' compensation benefits for Keavin Edwards' January 30, 2017 left shoulder injury, finding that the incident aggravated a preexisting condition rather than creating a new compensable injury. The Commission found Edwards' testimony not credible regarding the absence of shoulder problems between his 2008 surgery and the 2017 incident, and adopted medical opinions attributing his 35% permanent partial disability to preexisting degeneration and degenerative arthritis rather than the work incident.

shoulder4,189 words

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission affirmed the Administrative Law Judge's award denying workers' compensation benefits to employee Dwayne Southerland for his September 6, 2011 shoulder injury. One commissioner dissented, arguing the Second Injury Fund should be liable for permanent total disability resulting from the combination of the primary injury and pre-existing conditions.

shoulder4,677 words