The claimant is 45 years old. He lives with his wife in Ironton, Missouri. He graduated from high school in 1985. He can read and write. He has not formal computer skills. After high school he has had no other formal training.
After high school he worked for Ceco Building Manufacturing. This company erected metal buildings. He performed manual labor and no supervisory duties. Next, from 1998 to 2005, he worked for HES Contracting, a general contractor also erecting metal buildings. He performed concrete, framing, general construction, and was eventually promoted to a supervisory role as a foreman. In 2005 he went to work for Heimburger Construction Inc., the employer, again performing general labor as an ironworker.
The claimant explained that his checks were issued by Select PEO Inc./ELS HR Solutions but Bob Heimburger, as owner of Heimburger Construction Inc., controlled the work and gave directions to the employee.
When working for Heimburger Construction Inc., claimant was involved in framed steel buildings and sheeted them with metal. He described how the frame of the building would be placed with a crane, tied together, and then squared up. After it was framed and squared it would be sheeted with sheet metal.
Prior to claimant's work injury he had testicular cancer in 1991 from which he fully recovered. He had also had some ulcers which had fully recovered. On June 20, 2006, he was descending stairs in his home when he fell approximately 7 feet landing on his right foot. He went to the Mineral Area Regional Medical Center in Farmington, Missouri. X-rays were performed which showed a fractured calcaneus of the right foot. Dr. Robert Duddy
recommended the claimant to schedule an open reduction internal fixation of the right calcaneus to surgically repair the fracture. Because the claimant did not have insurance he could not afford the surgery and opted for conservative treatment. On July 7, 2006, his right foot and ankle were casted instead. He was prescribed medication and exercises and was directed to not weight bear on the foot. He saw Dr. Richard Hollocher, an orthopedic surgeon, on August 29, 2006. Dr. Hollocher put him in a boot, prescribed medication and directed him to avoid weight bearing. On October 10, 2006, claimant saw Dr. Hollocher. Claimant was continuing to take medication and his right foot and ankle were swollen, sore and painful to stand on. Dr. Hollocher recommended surgery but the claimant declined because he could not afford it. The claimant had not worked since he fell and injured his foot in June and decided since he could not afford any further medical treatment to return to work because he had no other income.
Claimant returned to work at Heimburger Construction Inc. He was still taking Norco pain medication prescribed by the doctors. The injury to his right foot and ankle affected the claimant's balance, strength and stamina when he returned to work. He continued to have a burning pain in his ankle. He described it as feeling like walking on a rock. He also had limited movement in his ankle. He had difficulty standing on it and could not squat.
The employer was understanding of his limitations and allowed him to modify his work. Because he could not walk out on the steel beams as he could before the injury he was allowed to work out of a raised basket. Purlins are the steel beams set on rafters that form